[閒聊] 為何整天討論剛性需求?
我覺得剛性需求根本就狗屁。
你以為年輕人都白癡,沒長腦子阿。
你賣這麼貴,你鄰居租這麼便宜。
我腦袋有問題才跟你用買的。
我是覺得電視節目整天討論沙小剛性需求的根本就很好笑。
現在30-40歲年輕人剛好是人口大爆炸時代生的。
以前國小教室不夠還要分上午跟下午上課咧。
如果說真的有剛性需求,這群人不是剛好結婚生小孩。
道理上來說不是應該轉移棟數創新高嗎?
創新低還可以蒙著眼睛談剛性需求討論得很開心。
這些人真的是房產專家喔?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.228.195.57
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/home-sale/M.1486656995.A.9CD.html
→
02/10 00:18, , 1F
02/10 00:18, 1F
推
02/10 00:21, , 2F
02/10 00:21, 2F
推
02/10 00:21, , 3F
02/10 00:21, 3F
→
02/10 00:22, , 4F
02/10 00:22, 4F
→
02/10 00:22, , 5F
02/10 00:22, 5F
→
02/10 00:23, , 6F
02/10 00:23, 6F
→
02/10 00:24, , 7F
02/10 00:24, 7F
→
02/10 00:24, , 8F
02/10 00:24, 8F
→
02/10 00:25, , 9F
02/10 00:25, 9F
記住顏總說過,明天會更好他只是一首歌名,不是事實。
※ 編輯: Festo (36.228.195.57), 02/10/2017 00:27:37
推
02/10 01:12, , 10F
02/10 01:12, 10F
推
02/10 01:46, , 11F
02/10 01:46, 11F
推
02/10 01:51, , 12F
02/10 01:51, 12F
→
02/10 01:52, , 13F
02/10 01:52, 13F
→
02/10 01:54, , 14F
02/10 01:54, 14F
推
02/10 01:59, , 15F
02/10 01:59, 15F
推
02/10 03:16, , 16F
02/10 03:16, 16F
噓
02/10 06:40, , 17F
02/10 06:40, 17F
推
02/10 07:22, , 18F
02/10 07:22, 18F
推
02/10 08:11, , 19F
02/10 08:11, 19F
→
02/10 08:11, , 20F
02/10 08:11, 20F
推
02/10 09:09, , 21F
02/10 09:09, 21F
→
02/10 09:09, , 22F
02/10 09:09, 22F
→
02/10 09:09, , 23F
02/10 09:09, 23F
→
02/10 09:09, , 24F
02/10 09:09, 24F
推
02/10 09:27, , 25F
02/10 09:27, 25F
→
02/10 09:36, , 26F
02/10 09:36, 26F
→
02/10 09:37, , 27F
02/10 09:37, 27F
→
02/10 10:05, , 28F
02/10 10:05, 28F
推
02/10 10:20, , 29F
02/10 10:20, 29F
推
02/10 10:30, , 30F
02/10 10:30, 30F
→
02/10 10:30, , 31F
02/10 10:30, 31F
推
02/10 10:37, , 32F
02/10 10:37, 32F
→
02/10 10:38, , 33F
02/10 10:38, 33F
→
02/10 10:44, , 34F
02/10 10:44, 34F
→
02/10 10:45, , 35F
02/10 10:45, 35F
→
02/10 10:45, , 36F
02/10 10:45, 36F
→
02/10 10:47, , 37F
02/10 10:47, 37F
→
02/10 10:47, , 38F
02/10 10:47, 38F
→
02/10 10:47, , 39F
02/10 10:47, 39F
→
02/10 10:48, , 40F
02/10 10:48, 40F
推
02/10 10:49, , 41F
02/10 10:49, 41F
推
02/10 10:50, , 42F
02/10 10:50, 42F
→
02/10 10:50, , 43F
02/10 10:50, 43F
推
02/10 11:15, , 44F
02/10 11:15, 44F
→
02/10 11:16, , 45F
02/10 11:16, 45F
推
02/10 11:34, , 46F
02/10 11:34, 46F
推
02/10 12:19, , 47F
02/10 12:19, 47F
推
02/10 13:40, , 48F
02/10 13:40, 48F
推
02/10 14:05, , 49F
02/10 14:05, 49F
推
02/10 14:24, , 50F
02/10 14:24, 50F
推
02/10 16:25, , 51F
02/10 16:25, 51F
→
02/10 16:58, , 52F
02/10 16:58, 52F
推
02/10 20:30, , 53F
02/10 20:30, 53F
推
02/10 21:45, , 54F
02/10 21:45, 54F
推
02/11 11:10, , 55F
02/11 11:10, 55F
→
02/11 11:10, , 56F
02/11 11:10, 56F
推
02/11 12:59, , 57F
02/11 12:59, 57F
→
02/11 12:59, , 58F
02/11 12:59, 58F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
閒聊
27
69
閒聊
21
56
閒聊
12
31
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 12 篇):
閒聊
26
58
閒聊
27
69
閒聊
21
56
閒聊
12
31
閒聊
24
60