[閒聊] 社會支持房屋稅地價稅漲,台灣將自食惡果.
我今天看了媒體,發現台灣社會大多數人與學者,
一面倒的支持漲房屋稅與地價稅,我感到一陣心寒與恐懼.
支持漲持有稅的人,難道不知道死的一定是底層人民跟中產階級嗎???
我舉個例子大家就都懂了.
出了台北市,從新北與基隆跟其他所有縣市.
房屋出租的投報率幾乎只有1%,台北市更低.
為什麼呢,因為台灣的持有稅低.房東可以便宜出租.
房客可以租便宜房子,是房東房客雙贏的局面.
像臺中市,3房兩廳兩衛租金10000是很正常.
房價800萬,房租收入一年12萬,年投報1.5%很低,但這樣出租的房東大有人在.
因為持有稅低.
大家都稱讚的持有稅提高,會變啥樣.隨便推論都知道會有極悲慘的下場.
首先學者說自住持有稅要低,但又舉外國例子說實價1%.
那房東有房子出租營利非自住,那肯定要多課稅了.我隨便找個中位數,
就訂非自住實際課持有稅2%好了.
那根據我的估算,房東房子可能下跌50%,但房客租金將上漲50%~100%.
提高持有稅後,假設台中市3房兩廳兩衛的房子下跌50%,
那就是房價從800萬跌到400萬.
400萬的持有稅是多少?2%=80000 每個月就是要繳6600元,
房東要維持每月10000租金收入,所以房東將會把6600的持有稅轉嫁給房客.
以後房客的租金就暴漲66%.
有網友說不可能完全轉嫁,那好,轉嫁5000元也夠嗆了.
對窮人來說,甚至中產階級來說,房租暴漲五成幾乎意味著犯罪或死亡或流浪.
為什麼台灣要支持一個殺窮人跟中產階級的政策???
持有稅低的時候,買不起還可租.現在持有稅高,買不起房的窮人就只能去死了.
天佑台灣,希望台灣不要自食惡果!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.73.139.151
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/home-sale/M.1470941426.A.5B5.html
→
08/12 03:02, , 1F
08/12 03:02, 1F
推
08/12 03:13, , 2F
08/12 03:13, 2F
推
08/12 03:14, , 3F
08/12 03:14, 3F
→
08/12 03:14, , 4F
08/12 03:14, 4F
推
08/12 03:26, , 5F
08/12 03:26, 5F
推
08/12 03:33, , 6F
08/12 03:33, 6F
推
08/12 03:49, , 7F
08/12 03:49, 7F
推
08/12 04:20, , 8F
08/12 04:20, 8F
→
08/12 04:58, , 9F
08/12 04:58, 9F
推
08/12 05:20, , 10F
08/12 05:20, 10F
噓
08/12 06:04, , 11F
08/12 06:04, 11F
噓
08/12 06:17, , 12F
08/12 06:17, 12F
推
08/12 06:18, , 13F
08/12 06:18, 13F
→
08/12 06:19, , 14F
08/12 06:19, 14F
→
08/12 06:21, , 15F
08/12 06:21, 15F
→
08/12 06:25, , 16F
08/12 06:25, 16F
→
08/12 06:26, , 17F
08/12 06:26, 17F
→
08/12 06:59, , 18F
08/12 06:59, 18F
噓
08/12 07:34, , 19F
08/12 07:34, 19F
噓
08/12 07:39, , 20F
08/12 07:39, 20F
噓
08/12 07:58, , 21F
08/12 07:58, 21F
噓
08/12 08:05, , 22F
08/12 08:05, 22F
→
08/12 08:07, , 23F
08/12 08:07, 23F
推
08/12 08:18, , 24F
08/12 08:18, 24F
推
08/12 08:20, , 25F
08/12 08:20, 25F
→
08/12 08:21, , 26F
08/12 08:21, 26F
→
08/12 08:21, , 27F
08/12 08:21, 27F
推
08/12 08:23, , 28F
08/12 08:23, 28F
噓
08/12 08:31, , 29F
08/12 08:31, 29F
噓
08/12 08:32, , 30F
08/12 08:32, 30F
噓
08/12 08:40, , 31F
08/12 08:40, 31F
噓
08/12 08:41, , 32F
08/12 08:41, 32F
推
08/12 08:42, , 33F
08/12 08:42, 33F
→
08/12 08:42, , 34F
08/12 08:42, 34F
→
08/12 08:42, , 35F
08/12 08:42, 35F
→
08/12 08:42, , 36F
08/12 08:42, 36F
推
08/12 08:42, , 37F
08/12 08:42, 37F
→
08/12 08:47, , 38F
08/12 08:47, 38F
→
08/12 08:47, , 39F
08/12 08:47, 39F
還有 21 則推文
推
08/12 08:55, , 61F
08/12 08:55, 61F
→
08/12 08:55, , 62F
08/12 08:55, 62F
→
08/12 08:55, , 63F
08/12 08:55, 63F
→
08/12 08:55, , 64F
08/12 08:55, 64F
→
08/12 08:56, , 65F
08/12 08:56, 65F
→
08/12 08:57, , 66F
08/12 08:57, 66F
噓
08/12 09:09, , 67F
08/12 09:09, 67F
噓
08/12 09:14, , 68F
08/12 09:14, 68F
噓
08/12 09:16, , 69F
08/12 09:16, 69F
噓
08/12 09:19, , 70F
08/12 09:19, 70F
噓
08/12 09:28, , 71F
08/12 09:28, 71F
→
08/12 09:28, , 72F
08/12 09:28, 72F
噓
08/12 09:37, , 73F
08/12 09:37, 73F
→
08/12 09:37, , 74F
08/12 09:37, 74F
推
08/12 09:37, , 75F
08/12 09:37, 75F
推
08/12 09:39, , 76F
08/12 09:39, 76F
噓
08/12 09:44, , 77F
08/12 09:44, 77F
→
08/12 09:44, , 78F
08/12 09:44, 78F
噓
08/12 09:44, , 79F
08/12 09:44, 79F
推
08/12 09:44, , 80F
08/12 09:44, 80F
噓
08/12 09:45, , 81F
08/12 09:45, 81F
→
08/12 09:48, , 82F
08/12 09:48, 82F
推
08/12 09:55, , 83F
08/12 09:55, 83F
推
08/12 09:56, , 84F
08/12 09:56, 84F
推
08/12 10:00, , 85F
08/12 10:00, 85F
→
08/12 10:01, , 86F
08/12 10:01, 86F
噓
08/12 10:06, , 87F
08/12 10:06, 87F
噓
08/12 10:17, , 88F
08/12 10:17, 88F
→
08/12 10:17, , 89F
08/12 10:17, 89F
→
08/12 10:23, , 90F
08/12 10:23, 90F
噓
08/12 10:32, , 91F
08/12 10:32, 91F
→
08/12 10:33, , 92F
08/12 10:33, 92F
噓
08/12 10:46, , 93F
08/12 10:46, 93F
噓
08/12 11:40, , 94F
08/12 11:40, 94F
→
08/12 12:28, , 95F
08/12 12:28, 95F
→
08/12 12:29, , 96F
08/12 12:29, 96F
→
08/12 12:29, , 97F
08/12 12:29, 97F
→
08/12 12:30, , 98F
08/12 12:30, 98F
噓
08/13 10:36, , 99F
08/13 10:36, 99F
噓
08/13 10:37, , 100F
08/13 10:37, 100F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):