[問題] 表態守護房價?
如果政府大方表態守護房價,甚至表態不打房
應能討好「多數選民」吧?
為何反要做出打房假動作?
要選贏
應該公然守護房價啊
不論中國或臺灣
皆是以宣示打房為正義
不管是否真打房,其實應該不必如此吧?
討好少數無產人士有何意義?有何好處?
莫非政府官員打房其實是為了進貨?
有無相關邏輯之八卦?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.162.75.25
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/home-sale/M.1409666952.A.69F.html
→
09/02 22:11, , 1F
09/02 22:11, 1F
推
09/02 22:21, , 2F
09/02 22:21, 2F
→
09/02 22:27, , 3F
09/02 22:27, 3F
→
09/02 22:28, , 4F
09/02 22:28, 4F
→
09/02 22:28, , 5F
09/02 22:28, 5F
→
09/02 22:31, , 6F
09/02 22:31, 6F
→
09/02 22:32, , 7F
09/02 22:32, 7F
→
09/02 22:34, , 8F
09/02 22:34, 8F
→
09/02 22:34, , 9F
09/02 22:34, 9F
推
09/02 22:43, , 10F
09/02 22:43, 10F
→
09/02 22:44, , 11F
09/02 22:44, 11F
→
09/02 22:44, , 12F
09/02 22:44, 12F
推
09/02 22:47, , 13F
09/02 22:47, 13F
→
09/02 22:49, , 14F
09/02 22:49, 14F
→
09/02 22:50, , 15F
09/02 22:50, 15F
→
09/02 22:51, , 16F
09/02 22:51, 16F
→
09/02 22:55, , 17F
09/02 22:55, 17F
→
09/02 22:56, , 18F
09/02 22:56, 18F
噓
09/02 23:05, , 19F
09/02 23:05, 19F
→
09/02 23:06, , 20F
09/02 23:06, 20F
→
09/02 23:07, , 21F
09/02 23:07, 21F
→
09/02 23:12, , 22F
09/02 23:12, 22F
→
09/02 23:13, , 23F
09/02 23:13, 23F
→
09/02 23:15, , 24F
09/02 23:15, 24F
推
09/02 23:33, , 25F
09/02 23:33, 25F
推
09/02 23:40, , 26F
09/02 23:40, 26F
推
09/02 23:50, , 27F
09/02 23:50, 27F
推
09/02 23:53, , 28F
09/02 23:53, 28F
推
09/02 23:53, , 29F
09/02 23:53, 29F
→
09/03 00:03, , 30F
09/03 00:03, 30F
推
09/03 01:25, , 31F
09/03 01:25, 31F
→
09/03 01:43, , 32F
09/03 01:43, 32F
噓
09/03 07:14, , 33F
09/03 07:14, 33F
推
09/03 08:56, , 34F
09/03 08:56, 34F