Re: [新聞] 張金鶚:大台北房價 明年至少跌兩成
蠻好奇一件事情
就是如果到明年年底前
大台北地區房價都沒有"至少跌兩成"的情形出現(不管是整體平均還是某些特定地區)
那張教授須要負什麼責任嗎???
還是頂著學術的大旗就可以向立委一樣有言論免責呢?
畢竟張教授也算是地產界的權威
說的每一句話都是會對房地產界有所影響(姑且不論是不是反指標)
這樣有事沒事就放話說房價會怎樣
若是有人真的等到明年才買
發現更買不起了 那不是無語問蒼天???
(因為我有朋友就是這樣,本來幾年前要買,但是現在已經暫時放棄買房了 XDDD)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 120.126.194.192
推
11/12 11:46, , 1F
11/12 11:46, 1F
推
11/12 11:47, , 2F
11/12 11:47, 2F
推
11/12 11:48, , 3F
11/12 11:48, 3F
噓
11/12 11:48, , 4F
11/12 11:48, 4F
→
11/12 11:48, , 5F
11/12 11:48, 5F
→
11/12 12:01, , 6F
11/12 12:01, 6F
推
11/12 12:07, , 7F
11/12 12:07, 7F
推
11/12 12:14, , 8F
11/12 12:14, 8F
→
11/12 12:15, , 9F
11/12 12:15, 9F
推
11/12 12:22, , 10F
11/12 12:22, 10F
→
11/12 12:23, , 11F
11/12 12:23, 11F
→
11/12 12:24, , 12F
11/12 12:24, 12F
→
11/12 12:25, , 13F
11/12 12:25, 13F
→
11/12 12:28, , 14F
11/12 12:28, 14F
→
11/12 12:29, , 15F
11/12 12:29, 15F
→
11/12 12:29, , 16F
11/12 12:29, 16F
推
11/12 12:36, , 17F
11/12 12:36, 17F
→
11/12 12:37, , 18F
11/12 12:37, 18F
→
11/12 12:41, , 19F
11/12 12:41, 19F
推
11/12 12:42, , 20F
11/12 12:42, 20F
→
11/12 12:43, , 21F
11/12 12:43, 21F
→
11/12 14:00, , 22F
11/12 14:00, 22F
推
11/12 14:16, , 23F
11/12 14:16, 23F
→
11/12 14:16, , 24F
11/12 14:16, 24F
→
11/12 15:12, , 25F
11/12 15:12, 25F
→
11/12 20:47, , 26F
11/12 20:47, 26F
推
11/12 21:04, , 27F
11/12 21:04, 27F
推
11/13 00:15, , 28F
11/13 00:15, 28F
→
11/13 00:15, , 29F
11/13 00:15, 29F
推
11/13 00:46, , 30F
11/13 00:46, 30F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):