[心情] 蝦子
甲甲三不五時就靠北別人外貌協會很膚淺
卻一邊允許蝦子這種貶抑別人外貌的詞彙存在
甚至不覺得說別人蝦子是什麼不對的事。
剝掉頭就可以吃,表達兩種含義
1.所以身材OK 你就可以吃了?不是一樣膚淺嗎?
2.當你覺得別人因為外表拒絕你時,讓你感到難過的不就是「我長得不好看嗎?」如果這
會讓你難過,為什麼會覺得說別人臉不好看是一件可以被接受的事?
BTW真要說
甲板自介10個有9個不到水平
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 110.28.152.230
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/gay/M.1449896869.A.433.html
※ 編輯: dghkrt3489 (110.28.152.230), 12/12/2015 13:08:06
→
12/12 13:11, , 1F
12/12 13:11, 1F
噓
12/12 13:13, , 2F
12/12 13:13, 2F
噓
12/12 13:18, , 3F
12/12 13:18, 3F
甲甲開始崩潰 。這就叫見笑登羞氣嗎
※ 編輯: dghkrt3489 (140.112.217.24), 12/12/2015 13:25:35
推
12/12 13:25, , 4F
12/12 13:25, 4F
推
12/12 13:29, , 5F
12/12 13:29, 5F
推
12/12 13:31, , 6F
12/12 13:31, 6F
推
12/12 13:33, , 7F
12/12 13:33, 7F
噓
12/12 13:34, , 8F
12/12 13:34, 8F
這能正當化甲甲自打嘴巴啪啪啪嗎?
※ 編輯: dghkrt3489 (140.112.217.24), 12/12/2015 13:36:42
噓
12/12 13:36, , 9F
12/12 13:36, 9F
推
12/12 13:38, , 10F
12/12 13:38, 10F
→
12/12 13:38, , 11F
12/12 13:38, 11F
容不下異己的甲甲,侵害別人言論自由居然還可以沾沾自喜? 真的無下限。我個人是絕
對尊重言論自由,就算多個甲甲在版上透露我個資秀下限我也不會檢舉,反觀甲甲怎麼對
待不同意見的?
※ 編輯: dghkrt3489 (140.112.217.24), 12/12/2015 13:41:49
噓
12/12 13:45, , 12F
12/12 13:45, 12F
我不是膚淺的人不做這種事
※ 編輯: dghkrt3489 (140.112.217.24), 12/12/2015 13:46:50
噓
12/12 13:54, , 13F
12/12 13:54, 13F
→
12/12 13:54, , 14F
12/12 13:54, 14F
→
12/12 13:54, , 15F
12/12 13:54, 15F
噓
12/12 13:57, , 16F
12/12 13:57, 16F
噓
12/12 13:59, , 17F
12/12 13:59, 17F
→
12/12 14:00, , 18F
12/12 14:00, 18F
→
12/12 14:00, , 19F
12/12 14:00, 19F
我沒有不能接受哦,只是覺得甲甲這樣自打嘴巴很好笑。甲甲以外的圈子會這樣,不代表
甲甲就可以這樣啊。懂嗎?小學生等級的問題
※ 編輯: dghkrt3489 (140.112.217.24), 12/12/2015 14:04:17
→
12/12 14:09, , 20F
12/12 14:09, 20F
噓
12/12 14:43, , 21F
12/12 14:43, 21F
噓
12/12 14:49, , 22F
12/12 14:49, 22F
噓
12/12 15:39, , 23F
12/12 15:39, 23F
→
12/12 15:39, , 24F
12/12 15:39, 24F
→
12/12 15:39, , 25F
12/12 15:39, 25F
噓
12/12 15:56, , 26F
12/12 15:56, 26F
→
12/12 15:56, , 27F
12/12 15:56, 27F
噓
12/12 16:41, , 28F
12/12 16:41, 28F
噓
12/12 17:40, , 29F
12/12 17:40, 29F
→
12/12 17:40, , 30F
12/12 17:40, 30F
→
12/12 17:41, , 31F
12/12 17:41, 31F
→
12/12 17:41, , 32F
12/12 17:41, 32F
→
12/12 17:41, , 33F
12/12 17:41, 33F
有所限制沒錯,但必須衡量是否有真實惡意,可否證性,法益侵害危險性,絕對不是「仇
恨言論」這種不確定概念能解釋的,何況,甲板知識低下(像你,我這是藉由你的言論合
理評價的哦,並非辱罵)往往分不清「我討厭的言論」和「仇恨言論」的不同
還有 48 則推文
還有 7 段內文
→
12/13 08:16, , 82F
12/13 08:16, 82F
噓
12/13 08:26, , 83F
12/13 08:26, 83F
→
12/13 08:28, , 84F
12/13 08:28, 84F
→
12/13 08:28, , 85F
12/13 08:28, 85F
→
12/13 08:30, , 86F
12/13 08:30, 86F
噓
12/13 08:30, , 87F
12/13 08:30, 87F
噓
12/13 08:51, , 88F
12/13 08:51, 88F
→
12/13 08:51, , 89F
12/13 08:51, 89F
→
12/13 08:51, , 90F
12/13 08:51, 90F
→
12/13 08:51, , 91F
12/13 08:51, 91F
→
12/13 08:51, , 92F
12/13 08:51, 92F
→
12/13 08:51, , 93F
12/13 08:51, 93F
→
12/13 08:51, , 94F
12/13 08:51, 94F
→
12/13 08:51, , 95F
12/13 08:51, 95F
→
12/13 08:51, , 96F
12/13 08:51, 96F
→
12/13 08:51, , 97F
12/13 08:51, 97F
→
12/13 08:52, , 98F
12/13 08:52, 98F
噓
12/13 09:23, , 99F
12/13 09:23, 99F
→
12/13 09:23, , 100F
12/13 09:23, 100F
噓
12/13 12:22, , 101F
12/13 12:22, 101F
→
12/13 12:22, , 102F
12/13 12:22, 102F
噓
12/13 13:06, , 103F
12/13 13:06, 103F
噓
12/13 13:11, , 104F
12/13 13:11, 104F
→
12/13 13:11, , 105F
12/13 13:11, 105F
噓
12/13 13:13, , 106F
12/13 13:13, 106F
噓
12/13 14:33, , 107F
12/13 14:33, 107F
噓
12/13 15:42, , 108F
12/13 15:42, 108F
噓
12/13 16:13, , 109F
12/13 16:13, 109F
噗哧
噓
12/13 23:34, , 110F
12/13 23:34, 110F
不是
※ 編輯: dghkrt3489 (140.112.217.24), 12/13/2015 23:58:08
噓
12/14 02:08, , 111F
12/14 02:08, 111F
→
12/14 02:08, , 112F
12/14 02:08, 112F
噓
12/14 02:09, , 113F
12/14 02:09, 113F
→
12/14 02:09, , 114F
12/14 02:09, 114F
噓
12/14 05:08, , 115F
12/14 05:08, 115F
噓
12/15 08:59, , 116F
12/15 08:59, 116F
→
12/17 04:13, , 117F
12/17 04:13, 117F
→
12/17 04:13, , 118F
12/17 04:13, 118F
噓
12/17 22:59, , 119F
12/17 22:59, 119F
討論串 (同標題文章)