[問題] 女生用信仰問題拒絕男生婚前性行為..
請問一下女生若用信仰問題
認為婚前要守貞
拒絕跟男友發生婚前性行為
此時男生要怎樣去理解那個堅持才對?
1.愛她就是尊重她.................這應該是女版對這問題的答案
2.別傻了,不是不能督,只是不給你督................這應該是男版對這問題的答案
若真相的確是答案一的話,摸摸鼻子忍一下,還不致於會憤憤不平
但真相若是答案二的話,身為男友的確會很不高興
我的確不太相信男女真的會因宗教問題就堅持不發生婚前性行為(黑人跟范范婚前也說他們會跟上帝請假)
而且不是一堆人說想找處女就只能到幼稚園去找嗎?
所以兩個情況對照起來
我似乎是比較相信男版的答案
想問問看,的確有不少女生認為這種信仰堅持是存在的嗎?
但信仰會分男女嗎?為何就很少聽到男生有這種堅持呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.42.65.78
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/feminine_sex/M.1420205715.A.E1B.html
推
01/02 21:38, , 1F
01/02 21:38, 1F
→
01/02 21:38, , 2F
01/02 21:38, 2F
→
01/02 21:39, , 3F
01/02 21:39, 3F
→
01/02 21:40, , 4F
01/02 21:40, 4F
→
01/02 21:41, , 5F
01/02 21:41, 5F
→
01/02 21:42, , 6F
01/02 21:42, 6F
→
01/02 21:42, , 7F
01/02 21:42, 7F
→
01/02 21:43, , 8F
01/02 21:43, 8F
→
01/02 21:59, , 9F
01/02 21:59, 9F
→
01/02 22:00, , 10F
01/02 22:00, 10F
→
01/02 22:00, , 11F
01/02 22:00, 11F
→
01/02 22:05, , 12F
01/02 22:05, 12F
→
01/02 22:22, , 13F
01/02 22:22, 13F
→
01/02 22:23, , 14F
01/02 22:23, 14F
→
01/02 22:24, , 15F
01/02 22:24, 15F
→
01/02 22:26, , 16F
01/02 22:26, 16F
推
01/02 22:35, , 17F
01/02 22:35, 17F
推
01/02 22:43, , 18F
01/02 22:43, 18F
推
01/02 23:01, , 19F
01/02 23:01, 19F
→
01/02 23:07, , 20F
01/02 23:07, 20F
→
01/02 23:07, , 21F
01/02 23:07, 21F
推
01/02 23:15, , 22F
01/02 23:15, 22F
推
01/03 08:36, , 23F
01/03 08:36, 23F
推
01/03 10:23, , 24F
01/03 10:23, 24F
→
01/03 10:24, , 25F
01/03 10:24, 25F
→
01/03 10:24, , 26F
01/03 10:24, 26F
推
01/03 11:45, , 27F
01/03 11:45, 27F
→
01/03 18:54, , 28F
01/03 18:54, 28F
推
01/03 19:22, , 29F
01/03 19:22, 29F
→
01/03 19:23, , 30F
01/03 19:23, 30F
→
01/03 20:01, , 31F
01/03 20:01, 31F
→
01/03 23:18, , 32F
01/03 23:18, 32F
→
01/03 23:19, , 33F
01/03 23:19, 33F
→
01/03 23:22, , 34F
01/03 23:22, 34F
→
01/04 00:20, , 35F
01/04 00:20, 35F
→
01/04 00:20, , 36F
01/04 00:20, 36F
→
01/04 00:21, , 37F
01/04 00:21, 37F
→
01/04 00:21, , 38F
01/04 00:21, 38F
→
01/04 00:22, , 39F
01/04 00:22, 39F
→
01/04 00:22, , 40F
01/04 00:22, 40F
→
01/04 00:23, , 41F
01/04 00:23, 41F
→
01/04 00:24, , 42F
01/04 00:24, 42F
推
01/04 00:54, , 43F
01/04 00:54, 43F
→
01/04 00:55, , 44F
01/04 00:55, 44F
→
01/04 00:55, , 45F
01/04 00:55, 45F
→
01/04 00:55, , 46F
01/04 00:55, 46F
→
01/04 00:56, , 47F
01/04 00:56, 47F
→
01/04 00:57, , 48F
01/04 00:57, 48F
→
01/04 00:58, , 49F
01/04 00:58, 49F
→
01/04 00:59, , 50F
01/04 00:59, 50F
→
01/04 00:59, , 51F
01/04 00:59, 51F
→
01/04 01:01, , 52F
01/04 01:01, 52F
→
01/04 01:02, , 53F
01/04 01:02, 53F
→
01/04 01:03, , 54F
01/04 01:03, 54F
→
01/04 01:04, , 55F
01/04 01:04, 55F
→
01/04 01:05, , 56F
01/04 01:05, 56F
→
01/04 01:06, , 57F
01/04 01:06, 57F
→
01/04 01:07, , 58F
01/04 01:07, 58F
推
01/04 01:13, , 59F
01/04 01:13, 59F
→
01/04 01:14, , 60F
01/04 01:14, 60F
→
01/04 01:14, , 61F
01/04 01:14, 61F
→
01/04 01:16, , 62F
01/04 01:16, 62F
→
01/04 01:17, , 63F
01/04 01:17, 63F
→
01/04 01:17, , 64F
01/04 01:17, 64F
→
01/04 01:18, , 65F
01/04 01:18, 65F
→
01/04 01:19, , 66F
01/04 01:19, 66F
→
01/04 01:19, , 67F
01/04 01:19, 67F
→
01/04 01:19, , 68F
01/04 01:19, 68F
推
01/04 02:45, , 69F
01/04 02:45, 69F
→
01/04 02:45, , 70F
01/04 02:45, 70F
→
01/04 02:45, , 71F
01/04 02:45, 71F
推
01/04 03:06, , 72F
01/04 03:06, 72F
→
01/04 03:07, , 73F
01/04 03:07, 73F
→
01/04 03:08, , 74F
01/04 03:08, 74F
→
01/04 03:08, , 75F
01/04 03:08, 75F
→
01/04 03:09, , 76F
01/04 03:09, 76F
→
01/04 03:10, , 77F
01/04 03:10, 77F
→
01/04 03:10, , 78F
01/04 03:10, 78F
推
01/04 15:57, , 79F
01/04 15:57, 79F
→
01/04 15:57, , 80F
01/04 15:57, 80F
→
01/04 15:58, , 81F
01/04 15:58, 81F
→
01/04 17:53, , 82F
01/04 17:53, 82F
→
01/04 17:54, , 83F
01/04 17:54, 83F
推
01/05 17:51, , 84F
01/05 17:51, 84F
→
01/05 17:51, , 85F
01/05 17:51, 85F
→
01/05 19:04, , 86F
01/05 19:04, 86F
推
01/05 21:08, , 87F
01/05 21:08, 87F
推
01/06 14:31, , 88F
01/06 14:31, 88F
→
01/06 17:25, , 89F
01/06 17:25, 89F
→
01/06 17:26, , 90F
01/06 17:26, 90F
→
01/06 17:28, , 91F
01/06 17:28, 91F
推
01/07 03:50, , 92F
01/07 03:50, 92F
推
01/09 11:07, , 93F
01/09 11:07, 93F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):