[討論] 馬6新車vsQ50原廠認證試乘車消失
話說我老婆喜歡賓士,但想說管她錢我出的,最後就這兩台在考慮,沒想到最近有釋出Q5
0旗艦版原廠認證的試乘車,里程約5000,年份在一年之內,看過實車後車況幾乎等於全
新,只有些微使用痕跡,價格約在14X萬,跟馬6新車價差只有2X萬元。
優缺點如下
馬6 全新車,沒有被人開過就是爽,車機比Q50好,可選apple carplay,空間後行李箱很
大較實用,有抬頭顯示,有電子手剎車auto hold,記得acc跟到停再啟動不用重新設定。
缺點品牌低一級,2.0動力只能說一般般。
Q50試乘車,品牌較高級,但是跟1A2B1L還是有不少差距,個人主觀外型還是比馬6要帥,
Lexus IS造型太乖張不考慮。動力不用說,比馬6要強多了,後輪驅動算是男人的夢想,
但是空間就有點悲劇了。車機算是敗筆,可能過保後要換安卓機。 另外就是腳剎有點不
方便。其它倒是都讚不絕口。
保養維修感覺半斤八兩,I牌可以吃哈根大隻,但據點少加上嚴董牌,馬6之前發生過柴油
噴水事件,感覺若之後有出保的問題的話,原廠負責態度表現勘憂。
以上分析求解,其它車已不考慮就做最後決定了。若是各位會怎麼選呢?
洩洩收看
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.15.131.23
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1537678660.A.3A3.html
噓
09/23 12:59, , 1F
09/23 12:59, 1F
別醬嘛,至少開過的人個位數
推
09/23 13:00, , 2F
09/23 13:00, 2F
推
09/23 13:01, , 3F
09/23 13:01, 3F
其實是還好,但是我是跟馬六比就有點小了
推
09/23 13:05, , 4F
09/23 13:05, 4F
→
09/23 13:06, , 5F
09/23 13:06, 5F
我是沒有啦,所以才納入考量
推
09/23 13:08, , 6F
09/23 13:08, 6F
這倒是,但老婆不爽我也沒在顧了
推
09/23 13:10, , 7F
09/23 13:10, 7F
我沒有品牌情節,一切以CP值至上
推
09/23 13:17, , 8F
09/23 13:17, 8F
→
09/23 13:17, , 9F
09/23 13:17, 9F
→
09/23 13:17, , 10F
09/23 13:17, 10F
→
09/23 13:18, , 11F
09/23 13:18, 11F
馬6不差,但實車確實是Q50顏值較高
推
09/23 13:21, , 12F
09/23 13:21, 12F
※ 編輯: lannjm (101.15.131.23), 09/23/2018 13:25:50
推
09/23 13:25, , 13F
09/23 13:25, 13F
推
09/23 13:26, , 14F
09/23 13:26, 14F
→
09/23 13:27, , 15F
09/23 13:27, 15F
對了,選Q50的話,這2X萬的差價值得嗎?
※ 編輯: lannjm (101.15.131.23), 09/23/2018 13:30:22
推
09/23 13:29, , 16F
09/23 13:29, 16F
對吼,這個是很重要的點,列入考量
推
09/23 13:33, , 17F
09/23 13:33, 17F
推
09/23 13:36, , 18F
09/23 13:36, 18F
推
09/23 13:36, , 19F
09/23 13:36, 19F
推
09/23 13:43, , 20F
09/23 13:43, 20F
→
09/23 13:43, , 21F
09/23 13:43, 21F
謝謝您,列入考量,但二十幾萬說多不多,說少也不少
推
09/23 13:47, , 22F
09/23 13:47, 22F
infiniti有什麼品牌光環嗎,要不然為啥二手價差歪L那麼多
推
09/23 13:51, , 23F
09/23 13:51, 23F
推
09/23 13:52, , 24F
09/23 13:52, 24F
推
09/23 13:55, , 25F
09/23 13:55, 25F
→
09/23 13:55, , 26F
09/23 13:55, 26F
推
09/23 13:58, , 27F
09/23 13:58, 27F
推
09/23 13:58, , 28F
09/23 13:58, 28F
還有 44 則推文
還有 9 段內文
推
09/23 15:27, , 73F
09/23 15:27, 73F
推
09/23 15:30, , 74F
09/23 15:30, 74F
→
09/23 15:36, , 75F
09/23 15:36, 75F
推
09/23 15:36, , 76F
09/23 15:36, 76F
推
09/23 15:36, , 77F
09/23 15:36, 77F
推
09/23 15:44, , 78F
09/23 15:44, 78F
推
09/23 15:50, , 79F
09/23 15:50, 79F
推
09/23 15:55, , 80F
09/23 15:55, 80F
※ 編輯: lannjm (101.15.131.23), 09/23/2018 16:21:50
※ 編輯: lannjm (101.15.131.23), 09/23/2018 16:27:09
推
09/23 16:25, , 81F
09/23 16:25, 81F
推
09/23 16:46, , 82F
09/23 16:46, 82F
推
09/23 16:54, , 83F
09/23 16:54, 83F
推
09/23 16:55, , 84F
09/23 16:55, 84F
推
09/23 17:19, , 85F
09/23 17:19, 85F
→
09/23 17:20, , 86F
09/23 17:20, 86F
推
09/23 17:36, , 87F
09/23 17:36, 87F
推
09/23 17:41, , 88F
09/23 17:41, 88F
推
09/23 17:42, , 89F
09/23 17:42, 89F
推
09/23 19:06, , 90F
09/23 19:06, 90F
推
09/23 19:27, , 91F
09/23 19:27, 91F
推
09/23 19:32, , 92F
09/23 19:32, 92F
推
09/23 19:41, , 93F
09/23 19:41, 93F
推
09/23 19:56, , 94F
09/23 19:56, 94F
推
09/23 20:54, , 95F
09/23 20:54, 95F
→
09/23 20:55, , 96F
09/23 20:55, 96F
推
09/23 20:58, , 97F
09/23 20:58, 97F
推
09/23 21:22, , 98F
09/23 21:22, 98F
推
09/23 22:02, , 99F
09/23 22:02, 99F
推
09/23 23:34, , 100F
09/23 23:34, 100F
推
09/23 23:43, , 101F
09/23 23:43, 101F
→
09/23 23:45, , 102F
09/23 23:45, 102F
推
09/24 01:05, , 103F
09/24 01:05, 103F
推
09/24 02:47, , 104F
09/24 02:47, 104F
→
09/24 04:00, , 105F
09/24 04:00, 105F
推
09/24 07:16, , 106F
09/24 07:16, 106F
→
09/24 07:32, , 107F
09/24 07:32, 107F
推
09/24 10:05, , 108F
09/24 10:05, 108F
推
09/24 12:18, , 109F
09/24 12:18, 109F
→
09/24 22:54, , 110F
09/24 22:54, 110F
推
09/25 16:58, , 111F
09/25 16:58, 111F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):