[問題] Lexus NX 與 RX的安全性差異消失
大家好,我是昨天上來詢問如何說服老公換車的太太
不好意思因為推文已經失焦了 所以已把原文刪除
在此先感謝幾位網友提供很好的意見
今天和老公認真討論這件事
的確,CRV只有2~4個安全氣囊這件事讓老公也承認是有換車的理由
不過因為之前開過長輩的二手Volvo S60
讓我們對歐洲車有點卻步
所以目前鎖定lexus的 NX 跟 RX 系列
我們對動力沒有要求
在安全性方面
我今天作功課的結果是
除了RX 比 NX 多了兩顆氣囊外
還有差在盲點偵測(BSM) 檔位誤入動力限制(DSC) 後方車側交通警示(RCTA)
想請問版上大大們
以上幾點就安全性來講是不是很重要呢?
以NX200跟RX200t來說差了五十萬左右(但還在預算內)
畢竟退休金再存就有
但孩子會坐在我們車上的時間只剩十年
要換的話希望一步到位
感謝大家!
ps. 我的年收入高於我老公,想砲這點的就不必了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 175.182.129.204
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1509287115.A.B8E.html
推
10/29 22:26, , 1F
10/29 22:26, 1F
推
10/29 22:26, , 2F
10/29 22:26, 2F
推
10/29 22:27, , 3F
10/29 22:27, 3F
推
10/29 22:28, , 4F
10/29 22:28, 4F
推
10/29 22:29, , 5F
10/29 22:29, 5F
推
10/29 22:30, , 6F
10/29 22:30, 6F
謝謝指教
因為老公真的很省,50萬的差距要有好的理由說服
推
10/29 22:30, , 7F
10/29 22:30, 7F
推
10/29 22:32, , 8F
10/29 22:32, 8F
推
10/29 22:32, , 9F
10/29 22:32, 9F
→
10/29 22:33, , 10F
10/29 22:33, 10F
→
10/29 22:35, , 11F
10/29 22:35, 11F
※ 編輯: rochelle (175.182.129.204), 10/29/2017 22:36:24
推
10/29 22:36, , 12F
10/29 22:36, 12F
推
10/29 22:36, , 13F
10/29 22:36, 13F
推
10/29 22:36, , 14F
10/29 22:36, 14F
推
10/29 22:36, , 15F
10/29 22:36, 15F
推
10/29 22:37, , 16F
10/29 22:37, 16F
→
10/29 22:37, , 17F
10/29 22:37, 17F
推
10/29 22:37, , 18F
10/29 22:37, 18F
推
10/29 22:38, , 19F
10/29 22:38, 19F
推
10/29 22:38, , 20F
10/29 22:38, 20F
→
10/29 22:38, , 21F
10/29 22:38, 21F
推
10/29 22:38, , 22F
10/29 22:38, 22F
→
10/29 22:38, , 23F
10/29 22:38, 23F
→
10/29 22:38, , 24F
10/29 22:38, 24F
→
10/29 22:38, , 25F
10/29 22:38, 25F
推
10/29 22:38, , 26F
10/29 22:38, 26F
推
10/29 22:39, , 27F
10/29 22:39, 27F
→
10/29 22:39, , 28F
10/29 22:39, 28F
→
10/29 22:39, , 29F
10/29 22:39, 29F
→
10/29 22:39, , 30F
10/29 22:39, 30F
推
10/29 22:40, , 31F
10/29 22:40, 31F
→
10/29 22:41, , 32F
10/29 22:41, 32F
推
10/29 22:41, , 33F
10/29 22:41, 33F
推
10/29 22:41, , 34F
10/29 22:41, 34F
→
10/29 22:41, , 35F
10/29 22:41, 35F
→
10/29 22:41, , 36F
10/29 22:41, 36F
推
10/29 22:42, , 37F
10/29 22:42, 37F
還有 99 則推文
還有 3 段內文
推
10/30 06:53, , 137F
10/30 06:53, 137F
→
10/30 06:53, , 138F
10/30 06:53, 138F
→
10/30 06:53, , 139F
10/30 06:53, 139F
推
10/30 07:16, , 140F
10/30 07:16, 140F
推
10/30 07:20, , 141F
10/30 07:20, 141F
→
10/30 07:20, , 142F
10/30 07:20, 142F
推
10/30 08:31, , 143F
10/30 08:31, 143F
推
10/30 08:48, , 144F
10/30 08:48, 144F
推
10/30 08:52, , 145F
10/30 08:52, 145F
推
10/30 09:24, , 146F
10/30 09:24, 146F
推
10/30 09:28, , 147F
10/30 09:28, 147F
→
10/30 09:28, , 148F
10/30 09:28, 148F
→
10/30 09:29, , 149F
10/30 09:29, 149F
推
10/30 09:33, , 150F
10/30 09:33, 150F
→
10/30 09:33, , 151F
10/30 09:33, 151F
→
10/30 09:34, , 152F
10/30 09:34, 152F
→
10/30 09:34, , 153F
10/30 09:34, 153F
→
10/30 09:35, , 154F
10/30 09:35, 154F
推
10/30 09:35, , 155F
10/30 09:35, 155F
推
10/30 09:35, , 156F
10/30 09:35, 156F
→
10/30 09:36, , 157F
10/30 09:36, 157F
→
10/30 09:36, , 158F
10/30 09:36, 158F
→
10/30 09:36, , 159F
10/30 09:36, 159F
→
10/30 09:37, , 160F
10/30 09:37, 160F
推
10/30 09:42, , 161F
10/30 09:42, 161F
推
10/30 10:14, , 162F
10/30 10:14, 162F
推
10/30 11:09, , 163F
10/30 11:09, 163F
推
10/30 11:48, , 164F
10/30 11:48, 164F
→
10/30 11:49, , 165F
10/30 11:49, 165F
→
10/30 11:49, , 166F
10/30 11:49, 166F
推
10/30 12:27, , 167F
10/30 12:27, 167F
推
10/30 12:40, , 168F
10/30 12:40, 168F
推
10/30 13:19, , 169F
10/30 13:19, 169F
推
10/30 14:22, , 170F
10/30 14:22, 170F
推
10/30 15:07, , 171F
10/30 15:07, 171F
→
10/30 15:08, , 172F
10/30 15:08, 172F
→
10/30 15:08, , 173F
10/30 15:08, 173F
→
10/30 15:10, , 174F
10/30 15:10, 174F
→
10/30 15:10, , 175F
10/30 15:10, 175F
推
10/30 16:14, , 176F
10/30 16:14, 176F