[問題] outlander vs prius alpha vs touran?
因為最近小孩要出生了,所以開始在看車
又因為是家裡唯一的一台車
雖然平常使用可能不會滿載,但家庭成員就是
7人想說偶爾上館子之類的可以全家一起
於是就開始看5+2的車款
在差不多的價錢下就在看outlander和pa及土狼
大概看了一輪後,大約是有個結論!畢竟我只是負
責開車,真正幕後金主不是我!畢竟國產和進口很
好選,但金主不是這麼想!
結論是
1.土狼有著妥善率的缺點及後勤貴(金主非常討厭
這點)
2.pa之後會有昂貴的電池要換
3.outlander 對於金主來說沒有明顯的缺點
所以金主對於outlander有著濃厚的興趣,對了
金主本身不會開車對於車也不是太了解!他覺得
outlander 的cp值很高!
我想請問各位的是outlander 除了logo 之外還有什
麼明顯的缺點嗎?(為了說服金主不買)或是有什
麼優點?(說服我接受它)
我知道出錢人最大的道理......但中華汽車就支持不
下,個人最愛的是pa但內裝似乎稍陽春,要是土狼
不是dsg我會最愛它,老婆最愛的是vw!
至於其他人對於凹的乘坐空間很滿意!所以就死心
踏地,再加上業務說我們和Volvo 一樣有acc和自動
煞停,看來鹽董要贏了....
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.136.51.14
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1505576843.A.5B2.html
推
09/16 23:53, , 1F
09/16 23:53, 1F
推
09/16 23:54, , 2F
09/16 23:54, 2F
→
09/16 23:54, , 3F
09/16 23:54, 3F
推
09/16 23:57, , 4F
09/16 23:57, 4F
推
09/17 00:01, , 5F
09/17 00:01, 5F
→
09/17 00:01, , 6F
09/17 00:01, 6F
推
09/17 00:02, , 7F
09/17 00:02, 7F
→
09/17 00:03, , 8F
09/17 00:03, 8F
推
09/17 00:03, , 9F
09/17 00:03, 9F
→
09/17 00:04, , 10F
09/17 00:04, 10F
推
09/17 00:05, , 11F
09/17 00:05, 11F
推
09/17 00:18, , 12F
09/17 00:18, 12F
→
09/17 00:19, , 13F
09/17 00:19, 13F
推
09/17 00:21, , 14F
09/17 00:21, 14F
→
09/17 00:25, , 15F
09/17 00:25, 15F
→
09/17 00:25, , 16F
09/17 00:25, 16F
→
09/17 00:25, , 17F
09/17 00:25, 17F
推
09/17 00:57, , 18F
09/17 00:57, 18F
推
09/17 01:06, , 19F
09/17 01:06, 19F
推
09/17 01:16, , 20F
09/17 01:16, 20F
→
09/17 01:16, , 21F
09/17 01:16, 21F
→
09/17 01:16, , 22F
09/17 01:16, 22F
→
09/17 01:16, , 23F
09/17 01:16, 23F
→
09/17 01:17, , 24F
09/17 01:17, 24F
→
09/17 01:17, , 25F
09/17 01:17, 25F
→
09/17 01:17, , 26F
09/17 01:17, 26F
推
09/17 02:18, , 27F
09/17 02:18, 27F
推
09/17 02:24, , 28F
09/17 02:24, 28F
推
09/17 03:06, , 29F
09/17 03:06, 29F
推
09/17 07:43, , 30F
09/17 07:43, 30F
→
09/17 07:43, , 31F
09/17 07:43, 31F
推
09/17 07:45, , 32F
09/17 07:45, 32F
推
09/17 08:12, , 33F
09/17 08:12, 33F
→
09/17 08:12, , 34F
09/17 08:12, 34F
→
09/17 08:12, , 35F
09/17 08:12, 35F
→
09/17 08:12, , 36F
09/17 08:12, 36F
→
09/17 08:12, , 37F
09/17 08:12, 37F
→
09/17 08:12, , 38F
09/17 08:12, 38F
→
09/17 08:12, , 39F
09/17 08:12, 39F
推
09/17 09:09, , 40F
09/17 09:09, 40F
推
09/17 09:13, , 41F
09/17 09:13, 41F
推
09/17 09:59, , 42F
09/17 09:59, 42F
推
09/17 10:31, , 43F
09/17 10:31, 43F
→
09/17 10:31, , 44F
09/17 10:31, 44F
→
09/17 10:32, , 45F
09/17 10:32, 45F
推
09/17 10:37, , 46F
09/17 10:37, 46F
推
09/17 10:38, , 47F
09/17 10:38, 47F
推
09/17 11:00, , 48F
09/17 11:00, 48F
推
09/17 11:07, , 49F
09/17 11:07, 49F
→
09/17 11:09, , 50F
09/17 11:09, 50F
→
09/17 11:09, , 51F
09/17 11:09, 51F
推
09/17 11:35, , 52F
09/17 11:35, 52F
→
09/17 11:36, , 53F
09/17 11:36, 53F
→
09/17 11:36, , 54F
09/17 11:36, 54F
推
09/17 11:51, , 55F
09/17 11:51, 55F
推
09/17 14:50, , 56F
09/17 14:50, 56F
推
09/17 14:52, , 57F
09/17 14:52, 57F
→
09/17 14:54, , 58F
09/17 14:54, 58F
→
09/17 14:54, , 59F
09/17 14:54, 59F
推
09/17 14:59, , 60F
09/17 14:59, 60F
→
09/17 14:59, , 61F
09/17 14:59, 61F
推
09/17 15:42, , 62F
09/17 15:42, 62F
→
09/17 17:42, , 63F
09/17 17:42, 63F
就在剛剛全家老小加業務去試乘了凹,在大家均能
妥協的情況下使用了第三排,和昨天一樣的人馬去
試乘pa比起來,大家開家庭會議的結果!以滿載空
間為最大的前提下,一致通過pa獲勝。當然第二排
的三張獨立坐椅及第三排的膝部空間和進出的容易
度都是pa獲勝。當然操控性或啥acc之類的只跟駕
駛有關的條件都不太算是被考慮的範圍!至於省下
的稅金和油錢就拿來貼補電池的錢,畢竟持有成本
差不多的情況下pa空間和其進口的身分以我的需求
算是勝出。謝謝大家提供的意見!
※ 編輯: yhh840502 (114.136.51.14), 09/17/2017 17:59:18
→
09/17 18:00, , 64F
09/17 18:00, 64F
推
09/17 22:12, , 65F
09/17 22:12, 65F
→
09/18 15:33, , 66F
09/18 15:33, 66F
推
09/18 16:44, , 67F
09/18 16:44, 67F
推
09/20 17:22, , 68F
09/20 17:22, 68F
→
09/20 17:22, , 69F
09/20 17:22, 69F
推
09/20 23:27, , 70F
09/20 23:27, 70F