[問題] 發生擦撞要求原廠報價賠償一定合理嗎?
周末掃墓時遇到塞車
在換車道時沒注意到前車減速結果"碰到他車尾"
基本上車速很慢所以沒有變形
只是留下了印痕(如下)
小弟算是半個新手
周末掃墓時遇到塞車
在換車道時沒注意到前車速度結果車頭碰到他車尾
基本上車速很慢所以損傷很小
在對方車尾留下了印痕(如下)
https://goo.gl/X5myQQ
(對方車體本身有需多舊傷)
因為感覺還是我這邊責任大因此打算賠錢解決
找警察留了紀錄也留了聯絡方式
但是對方回去直接就丟原廠8000多的報價單過來
看網路上這樣的印痕頂多幾百塊應該就能解決(有錯請指正)
想請問只要發生碰撞,不論傷勢如何對方都可以要求原廠的報價賠償嗎?
這麼小的損傷被要求這麼高的賠償金實在難以接受
看網路上好像這類事滿常發生的,但是只能"自求多福"
意思是雖然對方是故意小題大作但也的確有正當性?
賠償方沒有抗議的依據?
假如真的談不攏去協調委員會,賠償金也是預設為原廠的價格嗎?
還是會去評估損害程度及車體本身的新舊之纇的?
另外我到時可以用哪些方式降低我的損失?
雖然願意賠錢但是被獅子大開口有點接受不了
又假如對方後來改變態度願意和解
是一定要有正式的和解書才有保障嗎?
還是可以用line跟匯款紀錄證明?
因為對方感覺就是要錢的已經不敢太信任他了
如果有大大有類似處理經驗也歡迎分享下
感激不盡!!
PS:當下有找警察留下紀錄,雙方似乎都只有強制險
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.251.207.37
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1490712259.A.DE4.html
※ 編輯: fabre77912 (111.251.207.37), 03/28/2017 22:55:23
推
03/28 22:49, , 1F
03/28 22:49, 1F
→
03/28 22:49, , 2F
03/28 22:49, 2F
→
03/28 22:51, , 3F
03/28 22:51, 3F
推
03/28 22:53, , 4F
03/28 22:53, 4F
→
03/28 22:53, , 5F
03/28 22:53, 5F
推
03/28 22:58, , 6F
03/28 22:58, 6F
→
03/28 22:58, , 7F
03/28 22:58, 7F
推
03/28 23:01, , 8F
03/28 23:01, 8F
→
03/28 23:02, , 9F
03/28 23:02, 9F
→
03/28 23:02, , 10F
03/28 23:02, 10F
噓
03/28 23:03, , 11F
03/28 23:03, 11F
→
03/28 23:03, , 12F
03/28 23:03, 12F
推
03/28 23:03, , 13F
03/28 23:03, 13F
→
03/28 23:03, , 14F
03/28 23:03, 14F
→
03/28 23:04, , 15F
03/28 23:04, 15F
這邊說明一下,不是覺得8千很貴只是覺得這金額跟網路上看到的和自己過去處理
的花費差很多,我本來是想說兩三千應該可以處理我再多貼ㄧ千表示誠意
推
03/28 23:05, , 16F
03/28 23:05, 16F
噓
03/28 23:06, , 17F
03/28 23:06, 17F
推
03/28 23:07, , 18F
03/28 23:07, 18F
→
03/28 23:08, , 19F
03/28 23:08, 19F
噓
03/28 23:11, , 20F
03/28 23:11, 20F
噓 yukina23: 改天換你被撞的時候再收別人800啊
03/28 23:12
就是之前被別人擦到找保養廠簡單處理了也就沒打算跟對方要錢,這次自己被要才嚇到
→
03/28 23:14, , 21F
03/28 23:14, 21F
→
03/28 23:14, , 22F
03/28 23:14, 22F
推
03/28 23:16, , 23F
03/28 23:16, 23F
→
03/28 23:16, , 24F
03/28 23:16, 24F
→
03/28 23:21, , 25F
03/28 23:21, 25F
噓
03/28 23:22, , 26F
03/28 23:22, 26F
→
03/28 23:22, , 27F
03/28 23:22, 27F
→
03/28 23:23, , 28F
03/28 23:23, 28F
其實自己平常沒開車,這次是家裡去掃墓幫忙開,經過這次意外有想跟家人建議保下
※ 編輯: fabre77912 (111.251.207.37), 03/28/2017 23:34:16
噓
03/28 23:25, , 29F
03/28 23:25, 29F
推
03/28 23:36, , 30F
03/28 23:36, 30F
→
03/28 23:37, , 31F
03/28 23:37, 31F
→
03/28 23:38, , 32F
03/28 23:38, 32F
噓
03/28 23:45, , 33F
03/28 23:45, 33F
噓
03/28 23:45, , 34F
03/28 23:45, 34F
→
03/28 23:49, , 35F
03/28 23:49, 35F
還有 50 則推文
推
03/29 10:31, , 86F
03/29 10:31, 86F
→
03/29 10:31, , 87F
03/29 10:31, 87F
推
03/29 10:57, , 88F
03/29 10:57, 88F
→
03/29 10:57, , 89F
03/29 10:57, 89F
→
03/29 10:58, , 90F
03/29 10:58, 90F
→
03/29 10:59, , 91F
03/29 10:59, 91F
→
03/29 11:00, , 92F
03/29 11:00, 92F
→
03/29 11:00, , 93F
03/29 11:00, 93F
噓
03/29 11:21, , 94F
03/29 11:21, 94F
→
03/29 11:21, , 95F
03/29 11:21, 95F
→
03/29 11:22, , 96F
03/29 11:22, 96F
推
03/29 11:36, , 97F
03/29 11:36, 97F
→
03/29 11:42, , 98F
03/29 11:42, 98F
推
03/29 13:12, , 99F
03/29 13:12, 99F
推
03/29 13:12, , 100F
03/29 13:12, 100F
推
03/29 13:29, , 101F
03/29 13:29, 101F
推
03/29 13:50, , 102F
03/29 13:50, 102F
推
03/29 13:50, , 103F
03/29 13:50, 103F
推
03/29 13:51, , 104F
03/29 13:51, 104F
推
03/29 13:52, , 105F
03/29 13:52, 105F
推
03/29 14:00, , 106F
03/29 14:00, 106F
→
03/29 14:01, , 107F
03/29 14:01, 107F
噓
03/29 14:41, , 108F
03/29 14:41, 108F
推
03/29 14:41, , 109F
03/29 14:41, 109F
噓
03/29 16:01, , 110F
03/29 16:01, 110F
噓
03/29 16:07, , 111F
03/29 16:07, 111F
→
03/29 16:07, , 112F
03/29 16:07, 112F
→
03/29 16:46, , 113F
03/29 16:46, 113F
→
03/29 16:58, , 114F
03/29 16:58, 114F
→
03/29 16:59, , 115F
03/29 16:59, 115F
噓
03/29 17:19, , 116F
03/29 17:19, 116F
→
03/29 18:18, , 117F
03/29 18:18, 117F
推
03/29 19:04, , 118F
03/29 19:04, 118F
推
03/29 19:04, , 119F
03/29 19:04, 119F
噓
03/29 20:20, , 120F
03/29 20:20, 120F
噓
03/29 23:09, , 121F
03/29 23:09, 121F
推
03/30 01:23, , 122F
03/30 01:23, 122F
推
03/30 01:25, , 123F
03/30 01:25, 123F
推
03/30 01:26, , 124F
03/30 01:26, 124F
推
03/30 07:34, , 125F
03/30 07:34, 125F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 6 篇):