[討論] 為什麼很多社團都要車友加98?
本人於FB 潛伏於許多車主社團
從普通車到高級車都有
最常看到在問要加什麼油
結果底下清一色都說98
什麼對車比較好 開起來比較有力
偶爾說幾句95就好還會被反駁
但事實證明車的引擎要夠高級加98才有意義
像我自己的車是四缸渦輪的95/98都加過覺得根本沒差(可能功力不夠高深感覺不出來)
但為什麼不少日系四缸自然進氣車明明原廠說92就好
卻有一堆人硬要加98然後沾沾自喜?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.73.194.252
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1479378127.A.18D.html
推
11/17 18:23, , 1F
11/17 18:23, 1F
※ 編輯: jason0330 (42.73.194.252), 11/17/2016 18:23:51
→
11/17 18:23, , 2F
11/17 18:23, 2F
→
11/17 18:24, , 3F
11/17 18:24, 3F
那是舊觀念了
※ 編輯: jason0330 (42.73.194.252), 11/17/2016 18:24:34
→
11/17 18:24, , 4F
11/17 18:24, 4F
推
11/17 18:25, , 5F
11/17 18:25, 5F
→
11/17 18:26, , 6F
11/17 18:26, 6F
如果是那種車就算了因為是應該,但那種等級的社團也不會有人問這種問題
※ 編輯: jason0330 (42.73.194.252), 11/17/2016 18:27:50
→
11/17 18:37, , 7F
11/17 18:37, 7F
推
11/17 18:47, , 8F
11/17 18:47, 8F
推
11/17 18:54, , 9F
11/17 18:54, 9F
推
11/17 18:55, , 10F
11/17 18:55, 10F
推
11/17 18:59, , 11F
11/17 18:59, 11F
NX300h壓縮比12.5原廠說92就好
推
11/17 19:01, , 12F
11/17 19:01, 12F
推
11/17 19:07, , 13F
11/17 19:07, 13F
所以說壓縮比不是唯一指標
推
11/17 19:11, , 14F
11/17 19:11, 14F
推
11/17 19:17, , 15F
11/17 19:17, 15F
推
11/17 19:26, , 16F
11/17 19:26, 16F
推
11/17 19:30, , 17F
11/17 19:30, 17F
→
11/17 19:31, , 18F
11/17 19:31, 18F
推
11/17 19:31, , 19F
11/17 19:31, 19F
推
11/17 19:33, , 20F
11/17 19:33, 20F
※ 編輯: jason0330 (36.231.18.138), 11/17/2016 19:38:14
推
11/17 19:38, , 21F
11/17 19:38, 21F
推
11/17 19:38, , 22F
11/17 19:38, 22F
※ 編輯: jason0330 (36.231.18.138), 11/17/2016 19:41:18
推
11/17 19:41, , 23F
11/17 19:41, 23F
→
11/17 19:42, , 24F
11/17 19:42, 24F
推
11/17 19:42, , 25F
11/17 19:42, 25F
→
11/17 19:44, , 26F
11/17 19:44, 26F
→
11/17 19:46, , 27F
11/17 19:46, 27F
推
11/17 19:58, , 28F
11/17 19:58, 28F
推
11/17 20:07, , 29F
11/17 20:07, 29F
→
11/17 20:08, , 30F
11/17 20:08, 30F
推
11/17 20:13, , 31F
11/17 20:13, 31F
噓
11/17 20:36, , 32F
11/17 20:36, 32F
推
11/17 20:40, , 33F
11/17 20:40, 33F
推
11/17 20:42, , 34F
11/17 20:42, 34F
推
11/17 20:52, , 35F
11/17 20:52, 35F
→
11/17 20:56, , 36F
11/17 20:56, 36F
推
11/17 21:01, , 37F
11/17 21:01, 37F
推
11/17 21:02, , 38F
11/17 21:02, 38F
推
11/17 21:03, , 39F
11/17 21:03, 39F
推
11/17 21:07, , 40F
11/17 21:07, 40F
推
11/17 21:14, , 41F
11/17 21:14, 41F
推
11/17 21:21, , 42F
11/17 21:21, 42F
推
11/17 21:26, , 43F
11/17 21:26, 43F
→
11/17 21:28, , 44F
11/17 21:28, 44F
→
11/17 21:29, , 45F
11/17 21:29, 45F
→
11/17 21:39, , 46F
11/17 21:39, 46F
推
11/17 21:42, , 47F
11/17 21:42, 47F
→
11/17 21:43, , 48F
11/17 21:43, 48F
→
11/17 22:00, , 49F
11/17 22:00, 49F
推
11/17 22:03, , 50F
11/17 22:03, 50F
推
11/17 22:17, , 51F
11/17 22:17, 51F
→
11/17 22:27, , 52F
11/17 22:27, 52F
推
11/17 22:37, , 53F
11/17 22:37, 53F
推
11/17 22:50, , 54F
11/17 22:50, 54F
→
11/17 22:52, , 55F
11/17 22:52, 55F
推
11/17 23:01, , 56F
11/17 23:01, 56F
推
11/17 23:17, , 57F
11/17 23:17, 57F
→
11/17 23:18, , 58F
11/17 23:18, 58F
→
11/18 00:10, , 59F
11/18 00:10, 59F
推
11/18 00:15, , 60F
11/18 00:15, 60F
→
11/18 00:42, , 61F
11/18 00:42, 61F
→
11/18 00:43, , 62F
11/18 00:43, 62F
推
11/18 00:48, , 63F
11/18 00:48, 63F
→
11/18 00:51, , 64F
11/18 00:51, 64F
→
11/18 00:52, , 65F
11/18 00:52, 65F
→
11/18 00:53, , 66F
11/18 00:53, 66F
→
11/18 00:55, , 67F
11/18 00:55, 67F
推
11/18 08:19, , 68F
11/18 08:19, 68F
→
11/18 09:03, , 69F
11/18 09:03, 69F
→
11/18 09:04, , 70F
11/18 09:04, 70F
→
11/18 09:04, , 71F
11/18 09:04, 71F
→
11/18 09:04, , 72F
11/18 09:04, 72F
推
11/18 10:40, , 73F
11/18 10:40, 73F
推
11/18 10:54, , 74F
11/18 10:54, 74F
推
11/18 11:09, , 75F
11/18 11:09, 75F
→
11/18 11:09, , 76F
11/18 11:09, 76F
→
11/18 13:59, , 77F
11/18 13:59, 77F
→
11/21 07:47, , 78F
11/21 07:47, 78F