[問題]免付作者版稅的書.為何也貴森森?
很多經典的作品,國內外的
比如:紅樓夢、大亨小傳、亂世佳人....之類的書籍
作者都已逝世超過五十年以上,任何一家出版社出版這些作品
也已經不用再付任何錢給作者....這些書的成本不是應該少些了嗎??
可是怎麼我看了這些書的價格也不便宜呢?甚至還有越來越貴的趨勢
如果說,像國外的書籍可能還要再請新的人去重新翻譯,那可以理解
可是像紅樓夢、西遊記這類的書籍...沒有翻譯,也免付作者版稅,怎麼也貴成那樣
這類書本來就篇小眾了....書價又調高成那樣,不是願意買書讀的人更少嗎??
還是說出版社想說,這些書因為買的人少,但會買的人肯定非常喜歡
所以書再貴這些讀者群也是會買單,不想賠錢就靠這些人了..
真的很不解怎麼這些書變得越來越貴??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 115.165.212.246
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/book/M.1474935207.A.412.html
→
09/27 09:20, , 1F
09/27 09:20, 1F
→
09/27 09:20, , 2F
09/27 09:20, 2F
→
09/27 09:21, , 3F
09/27 09:21, 3F
推
09/27 09:45, , 4F
09/27 09:45, 4F
→
09/27 09:45, , 5F
09/27 09:45, 5F
推
09/27 10:06, , 6F
09/27 10:06, 6F
推
09/27 10:10, , 7F
09/27 10:10, 7F
→
09/27 10:10, , 8F
09/27 10:10, 8F
→
09/27 10:10, , 9F
09/27 10:10, 9F
→
09/27 10:40, , 10F
09/27 10:40, 10F
推
09/27 10:46, , 11F
09/27 10:46, 11F
→
09/27 10:47, , 12F
09/27 10:47, 12F
推
09/27 10:47, , 13F
09/27 10:47, 13F
推
09/27 10:56, , 14F
09/27 10:56, 14F
→
09/27 10:57, , 15F
09/27 10:57, 15F
推
09/27 10:57, , 16F
09/27 10:57, 16F
推
09/27 10:58, , 17F
09/27 10:58, 17F
→
09/27 10:58, , 18F
09/27 10:58, 18F
→
09/27 10:59, , 19F
09/27 10:59, 19F
→
09/27 11:04, , 20F
09/27 11:04, 20F
→
09/27 11:04, , 21F
09/27 11:04, 21F
推
09/27 13:19, , 22F
09/27 13:19, 22F
推
09/27 13:22, , 23F
09/27 13:22, 23F
→
09/27 13:22, , 24F
09/27 13:22, 24F
推
09/27 18:28, , 25F
09/27 18:28, 25F
→
09/27 18:41, , 26F
09/27 18:41, 26F
→
09/28 03:50, , 27F
09/28 03:50, 27F
→
09/28 03:51, , 28F
09/28 03:51, 28F
推
09/28 07:15, , 29F
09/28 07:15, 29F
→
09/28 07:16, , 30F
09/28 07:16, 30F
→
09/28 07:16, , 31F
09/28 07:16, 31F
推
09/28 08:29, , 32F
09/28 08:29, 32F
推
09/28 11:19, , 33F
09/28 11:19, 33F
推
09/28 14:03, , 34F
09/28 14:03, 34F
推
09/28 18:57, , 35F
09/28 18:57, 35F
推
09/28 21:14, , 36F
09/28 21:14, 36F
→
09/28 21:15, , 37F
09/28 21:15, 37F
推
09/28 21:20, , 38F
09/28 21:20, 38F
→
09/28 21:21, , 39F
09/28 21:21, 39F
→
09/29 20:23, , 40F
09/29 20:23, 40F
→
09/29 20:23, , 41F
09/29 20:23, 41F
→
09/29 20:24, , 42F
09/29 20:24, 42F
推
09/29 22:59, , 43F
09/29 22:59, 43F
→
09/29 22:59, , 44F
09/29 22:59, 44F
→
09/29 22:59, , 45F
09/29 22:59, 45F
→
09/29 22:59, , 46F
09/29 22:59, 46F
→
09/29 23:02, , 47F
09/29 23:02, 47F
→
09/29 23:02, , 48F
09/29 23:02, 48F
→
09/29 23:04, , 49F
09/29 23:04, 49F
→
09/29 23:04, , 50F
09/29 23:04, 50F
→
09/29 23:04, , 51F
09/29 23:04, 51F
→
09/30 15:25, , 52F
09/30 15:25, 52F
推
09/30 21:53, , 53F
09/30 21:53, 53F
→
09/30 21:54, , 54F
09/30 21:54, 54F
→
09/30 21:56, , 55F
09/30 21:56, 55F
→
09/30 21:57, , 56F
09/30 21:57, 56F
→
09/30 22:00, , 57F
09/30 22:00, 57F
推
10/01 06:05, , 58F
10/01 06:05, 58F
→
10/01 06:05, , 59F
10/01 06:05, 59F
推
10/04 23:21, , 60F
10/04 23:21, 60F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):