[新車] Smax / FT6
《是否已閱讀置底文章『[新車] 2012主流車種比較』》
Yes
《是否至車行看過實車》
Yes
《欲比較之品牌及車種》
(1)Smax
(2)FT6
《車主需求》
1. 長程舒適
2. 動力充足
3. 車廂空間足夠放進全罩帽
4. 問題少
5. 騎乘時穩定
《預算範圍》
兩台價格皆可接受
《補充說明》
各位版友好,小弟177/77,兩台皆可雙腳踩地,原本鎖定車款是FT6,非常喜歡他的
大燈,但胸前V型板的顏色真的是非常悲劇,最近舅舅牽了Smax,試騎後發現正常騎乘狀
況下是不會打到腳的,高速巡航非常穩定,動力輸出尚可,但已達要求,原本擔心的車廂
,在某些帽款同樣是可以進去的,牽車後會小改,重新烤漆,兩台的優點都滿多的,不知
道如何抉擇,自家有車位,屏東停車方便性普通,Smax的大車體問題可以忽略,以上有請
版友幫忙分析
--
Sent from my Android
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.14.106.60
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/biker/M.1424498056.A.37A.html
推
02/21 13:57, , 1F
02/21 13:57, 1F
→
02/21 14:18, , 2F
02/21 14:18, 2F
就是騎起來非常滑順,加速很線性
朋友只有NFT,沒騎過FT6,沒辦法比較
推
02/21 14:26, , 3F
02/21 14:26, 3F
推
02/21 14:34, , 4F
02/21 14:34, 4F
→
02/21 14:34, , 5F
02/21 14:34, 5F
→
02/21 14:35, , 6F
02/21 14:35, 6F
推
02/21 14:51, , 7F
02/21 14:51, 7F
→
02/21 14:51, , 8F
02/21 14:51, 8F
推
02/21 16:56, , 9F
02/21 16:56, 9F
→
02/21 16:56, , 10F
02/21 16:56, 10F
基本上稅金部分可以無視
推
02/21 17:24, , 11F
02/21 17:24, 11F
推
02/21 17:27, , 12F
02/21 17:27, 12F
→
02/21 17:29, , 13F
02/21 17:29, 13F
推
02/21 17:53, , 14F
02/21 17:53, 14F
→
02/21 17:54, , 15F
02/21 17:54, 15F
→
02/21 17:54, , 16F
02/21 17:54, 16F
→
02/21 18:07, , 17F
02/21 18:07, 17F
→
02/21 18:15, , 18F
02/21 18:15, 18F
→
02/21 18:20, , 19F
02/21 18:20, 19F
→
02/21 18:20, , 20F
02/21 18:20, 20F
→
02/21 18:21, , 21F
02/21 18:21, 21F
→
02/21 18:22, , 22F
02/21 18:22, 22F
→
02/21 18:28, , 23F
02/21 18:28, 23F
水冷車老了有問題是水箱還是水線呢?
→
02/21 19:11, , 24F
02/21 19:11, 24F
推
02/21 19:17, , 25F
02/21 19:17, 25F
→
02/21 19:18, , 26F
02/21 19:18, 26F
→
02/21 19:18, , 27F
02/21 19:18, 27F
→
02/21 19:19, , 28F
02/21 19:19, 28F
推
02/21 19:21, , 29F
02/21 19:21, 29F
→
02/21 19:22, , 30F
02/21 19:22, 30F
→
02/21 19:23, , 31F
02/21 19:23, 31F
相對來說Smax就要當帽奴了xD
推
02/21 19:24, , 32F
02/21 19:24, 32F
謝謝,FT6長程是不舒適還是只是舒適性較差呢?
→
02/21 19:31, , 33F
02/21 19:31, 33F
少見不知該算缺點還是優點呢…
還有 29 則推文
還有 2 段內文
對,我也有這個感覺,所以突然把他加入選項,原先是買定FT6了
→
02/22 01:41, , 63F
02/22 01:41, 63F
推
02/22 01:46, , 64F
02/22 01:46, 64F
→
02/22 01:46, , 65F
02/22 01:46, 65F
→
02/22 01:46, , 66F
02/22 01:46, 66F
→
02/22 01:46, , 67F
02/22 01:46, 67F
→
02/22 01:46, , 68F
02/22 01:46, 68F
→
02/22 01:47, , 69F
02/22 01:47, 69F
→
02/22 01:48, , 70F
02/22 01:48, 70F
→
02/22 01:49, , 71F
02/22 01:49, 71F
→
02/22 01:51, , 72F
02/22 01:51, 72F
→
02/22 01:51, , 73F
02/22 01:51, 73F
→
02/22 01:53, , 74F
02/22 01:53, 74F
車廂前段比較悲劇,後段算是普通
→
02/22 01:56, , 75F
02/22 01:56, 75F
噓
02/22 02:01, , 76F
02/22 02:01, 76F
推
02/22 02:23, , 77F
02/22 02:23, 77F
→
02/22 02:23, , 78F
02/22 02:23, 78F
推
02/22 02:25, , 79F
02/22 02:25, 79F
推
02/22 06:50, , 80F
02/22 06:50, 80F
→
02/22 06:50, , 81F
02/22 06:50, 81F
推
02/22 09:08, , 82F
02/22 09:08, 82F
→
02/22 09:09, , 83F
02/22 09:09, 83F
推
02/22 12:21, , 84F
02/22 12:21, 84F
FT6油耗經許多人證實,其實不差
※ 編輯: JUSTER (101.14.106.60), 02/22/2015 12:35:42
→
02/22 14:30, , 85F
02/22 14:30, 85F
噓
02/22 16:02, , 86F
02/22 16:02, 86F
→
02/22 16:51, , 87F
02/22 16:51, 87F
推
02/22 19:18, , 88F
02/22 19:18, 88F
→
02/22 22:05, , 89F
02/22 22:05, 89F
→
02/22 22:05, , 90F
02/22 22:05, 90F
→
02/22 22:06, , 91F
02/22 22:06, 91F
→
02/22 22:34, , 92F
02/22 22:34, 92F
→
02/22 23:13, , 93F
02/22 23:13, 93F
推
02/22 23:54, , 94F
02/22 23:54, 94F
→
02/22 23:54, , 95F
02/22 23:54, 95F
→
02/22 23:54, , 96F
02/22 23:54, 96F
→
02/22 23:54, , 97F
02/22 23:54, 97F
→
02/22 23:54, , 98F
02/22 23:54, 98F
推
02/24 01:37, , 99F
02/24 01:37, 99F
討論串 (同標題文章)