[問題] 前NBA球員搶民宅是否意味體育署不積極?消失
前 NBA 球員 J.J. Hickson 美國時間星期五因搶劫民宅被警方逮捕,不准交保
今年29歲的 Hickson 和他的同夥於星期五早上持刀闖入亞特蘭大郊區的一戶民宅。
不太相信 前NBA球員沒錢生活到要搶劫,不會考慮到台灣當規劃洋將,每個月月薪40萬台
幣,有健保 還有一堆外國人福利,而且沒有種族歧視,治安又好。 如果體育署積極去接
洽這些前NBA球員們,讓他們知道人生不難 ,還有個台灣規劃球員的選項。台灣要規劃接
近NBA實力的洋將根本不難,到頭來中華隊新洋將難產 ,是否主因是體育署不積極作為。
ps: Hickson 在2008年被騎士隊以第一輪第19順位選秀進入 NBA
在聯盟八年中曾效力過騎士.國王.拓荒者.金塊和巫師等球隊
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 110.28.228.141
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/basketballTW/M.1529265108.A.3BB.html
噓
06/18 04:22, , 1F
06/18 04:22, 1F
認真沒在反串
※ 編輯: st52332002 (110.28.228.141), 06/18/2018 04:36:39
→
06/18 05:28, , 2F
06/18 05:28, 2F
→
06/18 05:29, , 3F
06/18 05:29, 3F
→
06/18 05:29, , 4F
06/18 05:29, 4F
→
06/18 05:30, , 5F
06/18 05:30, 5F
→
06/18 07:51, , 6F
06/18 07:51, 6F
→
06/18 07:51, , 7F
06/18 07:51, 7F
→
06/18 08:06, , 8F
06/18 08:06, 8F
推
06/18 08:13, , 9F
06/18 08:13, 9F
噓
06/18 08:24, , 10F
06/18 08:24, 10F
→
06/18 08:24, , 11F
06/18 08:24, 11F
→
06/18 08:24, , 12F
06/18 08:24, 12F
噓
06/18 09:10, , 13F
06/18 09:10, 13F
→
06/18 09:25, , 14F
06/18 09:25, 14F
推
06/18 09:31, , 15F
06/18 09:31, 15F
推
06/18 09:42, , 16F
06/18 09:42, 16F
推
06/18 09:55, , 17F
06/18 09:55, 17F
→
06/18 10:19, , 18F
06/18 10:19, 18F
→
06/18 10:25, , 19F
06/18 10:25, 19F
噓
06/18 10:32, , 20F
06/18 10:32, 20F
噓
06/18 10:37, , 21F
06/18 10:37, 21F
→
06/18 10:37, , 22F
06/18 10:37, 22F
噓
06/18 10:38, , 23F
06/18 10:38, 23F
噓
06/18 11:27, , 24F
06/18 11:27, 24F
→
06/18 11:27, , 25F
06/18 11:27, 25F
→
06/18 11:27, , 26F
06/18 11:27, 26F
噓
06/18 11:42, , 27F
06/18 11:42, 27F
當然是在他們搶劫前就去找阿
如果夠積極去接洽每個被NBA拋棄的棄將
一定更有機會找到那些沒錢又想打球的人規劃當洋將
→
06/18 12:27, , 28F
06/18 12:27, 28F
噓
06/18 12:28, , 29F
06/18 12:28, 29F
推
06/18 12:45, , 30F
06/18 12:45, 30F
噓
06/18 12:48, , 31F
06/18 12:48, 31F
噓
06/18 13:13, , 32F
06/18 13:13, 32F
噓
06/18 13:14, , 33F
06/18 13:14, 33F
推
06/18 13:30, , 34F
06/18 13:30, 34F
→
06/18 13:31, , 35F
06/18 13:31, 35F
噓
06/18 13:33, , 36F
06/18 13:33, 36F
→
06/18 13:40, , 37F
06/18 13:40, 37F
推
06/18 14:03, , 38F
06/18 14:03, 38F
※ 編輯: st52332002 (27.246.202.172), 06/18/2018 14:41:25
推
06/18 15:13, , 39F
06/18 15:13, 39F
推
06/18 15:24, , 40F
06/18 15:24, 40F
→
06/18 15:24, , 41F
06/18 15:24, 41F
那可能舉這個例子並不好,不過應該有很多沒錢的NBA球員存在
噓
06/18 15:42, , 42F
06/18 15:42, 42F
邏輯哪裡失敗了?
※ 編輯: st52332002 (27.246.202.172), 06/18/2018 15:50:22
推
06/18 15:53, , 43F
06/18 15:53, 43F
→
06/18 15:54, , 44F
06/18 15:54, 44F
→
06/18 15:55, , 45F
06/18 15:55, 45F
→
06/18 16:35, , 46F
06/18 16:35, 46F
→
06/18 16:36, , 47F
06/18 16:36, 47F
噓
06/18 16:47, , 48F
06/18 16:47, 48F
噓
06/18 17:22, , 49F
06/18 17:22, 49F