Re: [新聞] 閻家驊涉賭 台啤球員、SBL教練皆震驚消失
看到一堆人說sbl沒人玩也太好笑
不知道是太天真,還是嚴粉在護航
首先要知道,他玩的是天下運動網,不是台灣運彩
地下運彩,每一場都單場,不用串關,玩起來多爽
再來,像嚴這種超過40的老頭,最喜歡玩得就是台灣有電視轉播的賽事
下注看比賽是很爽的,玩一些冷門的,還要找連結很麻煩不爽的
更何況他還是場場現場看
再來,他雖然指揮權給三哥,但有玩過賭盤的都知道
只要一個戰術,影響大小分很大,七早八早犯規戰術,是可以洗大小分的。讓分也都會受
影響
當然,今天不是懷疑打假球,而是他在這種位置,玩這個就一定是不對的,影響層面太廣
太大了。
現在最擔心的,反而是裁判這一塊。更何況嚴跟裁判一直有怨言
天祐台灣
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 58.114.221.192
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/basketballTW/M.1486649258.A.CDB.html
推
02/09 22:10, , 1F
02/09 22:10, 1F
→
02/09 22:10, , 2F
02/09 22:10, 2F
推
02/09 22:10, , 3F
02/09 22:10, 3F
→
02/09 22:10, , 4F
02/09 22:10, 4F
推
02/09 22:15, , 5F
02/09 22:15, 5F
推
02/09 22:15, , 6F
02/09 22:15, 6F
推
02/09 22:16, , 7F
02/09 22:16, 7F
推
02/09 22:22, , 8F
02/09 22:22, 8F
→
02/09 22:22, , 9F
02/09 22:22, 9F
→
02/09 22:22, , 10F
02/09 22:22, 10F
推
02/09 22:25, , 11F
02/09 22:25, 11F
→
02/09 22:25, , 12F
02/09 22:25, 12F
噓
02/09 22:28, , 13F
02/09 22:28, 13F
推
02/09 22:30, , 14F
02/09 22:30, 14F
推
02/09 22:30, , 15F
02/09 22:30, 15F
推
02/09 22:31, , 16F
02/09 22:31, 16F
推
02/09 22:34, , 17F
02/09 22:34, 17F
推
02/09 22:36, , 18F
02/09 22:36, 18F
→
02/09 22:36, , 19F
02/09 22:36, 19F
推
02/09 22:37, , 20F
02/09 22:37, 20F
→
02/09 22:38, , 21F
02/09 22:38, 21F
→
02/09 22:38, , 22F
02/09 22:38, 22F
噓
02/09 22:38, , 23F
02/09 22:38, 23F
→
02/09 22:38, , 24F
02/09 22:38, 24F
→
02/09 22:38, , 25F
02/09 22:38, 25F
→
02/09 22:39, , 26F
02/09 22:39, 26F
→
02/09 22:39, , 27F
02/09 22:39, 27F
推
02/09 22:41, , 28F
02/09 22:41, 28F
推
02/09 22:42, , 29F
02/09 22:42, 29F
推
02/09 22:43, , 30F
02/09 22:43, 30F
推
02/09 22:44, , 31F
02/09 22:44, 31F
→
02/09 22:45, , 32F
02/09 22:45, 32F
推
02/09 22:45, , 33F
02/09 22:45, 33F
→
02/09 22:46, , 34F
02/09 22:46, 34F
→
02/09 22:46, , 35F
02/09 22:46, 35F
→
02/09 22:47, , 36F
02/09 22:47, 36F
推
02/09 22:50, , 37F
02/09 22:50, 37F
→
02/09 22:50, , 38F
02/09 22:50, 38F
噓
02/09 22:52, , 39F
02/09 22:52, 39F
→
02/09 22:52, , 40F
02/09 22:52, 40F
→
02/09 22:57, , 41F
02/09 22:57, 41F
推
02/09 23:02, , 42F
02/09 23:02, 42F
→
02/09 23:02, , 43F
02/09 23:02, 43F
推
02/09 23:04, , 44F
02/09 23:04, 44F
推
02/09 23:06, , 45F
02/09 23:06, 45F
→
02/09 23:06, , 46F
02/09 23:06, 46F
→
02/09 23:12, , 47F
02/09 23:12, 47F
→
02/09 23:12, , 48F
02/09 23:12, 48F
推
02/09 23:13, , 49F
02/09 23:13, 49F
推
02/09 23:14, , 50F
02/09 23:14, 50F
→
02/09 23:14, , 51F
02/09 23:14, 51F
推
02/09 23:30, , 52F
02/09 23:30, 52F
→
02/09 23:58, , 53F
02/09 23:58, 53F
→
02/09 23:59, , 54F
02/09 23:59, 54F
噓
02/10 00:11, , 55F
02/10 00:11, 55F
噓
02/10 00:30, , 56F
02/10 00:30, 56F
推
02/10 01:09, , 57F
02/10 01:09, 57F
→
02/10 02:40, , 58F
02/10 02:40, 58F
推
02/10 03:34, , 59F
02/10 03:34, 59F
→
02/10 04:18, , 60F
02/10 04:18, 60F
推
02/10 06:29, , 61F
02/10 06:29, 61F
推
02/10 07:38, , 62F
02/10 07:38, 62F
→
02/10 07:38, , 63F
02/10 07:38, 63F
噓
02/10 08:18, , 64F
02/10 08:18, 64F
→
02/10 08:47, , 65F
02/10 08:47, 65F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 6 篇):