Re: [閒聊] 終於知道岱豪為什麼躺者都可以入選了
看到這篇,原本很多話想講的,到現在卻一句話也說不出來。
去年有看過我講岱豪文章的,大概都會知道岱豪有很多舊傷
有看我今年討論岱豪狀況的,也應該會明白SBL賽季雖然數據爛
但其間三次舊傷復發,沒有什麼大家講的很爽躺著領五百萬
但我也寫了一篇文章要岱豪振作
我是真切地希望岱豪能有水準以上的體能,在場上可以打25~30分鐘
我是真的希望岱豪不是只有打出一個NICE PLAY後,才短暫振作積極移動
看著他大半進攻都只是過半場擋人,側邊下滑要球,進禁區
推推手,然後站在高位看戲。偶爾進去二波
看著他防守卡完人還是只有撈撈撈或是放給別人撿,很多時候失位了就中定身咒
防守還原也不時會慢兩拍
我真的也很遺憾
但是更遺憾的是,今年我有機會看了去年我提的幾個200公分球員
劉鎮葳不只沒有爆發力可言,更是連正常比賽的體能都不足,
這樣一個UBA大一新生打義守,16分、11籃板,4火鍋。
看他各種奶油,各種東倒西歪,然後對面還守不住........
林柏翔當初在南山,後來到南湖也沒登錄,應該是不打了
陳彥沛磨了兩年,結果吳沛嘉一來就超越他,不過吳沛嘉打法很"周琦"
只靠身高手長在防守端展威,進攻沒突出技術靠機遇戰,感覺對抗性、
續航都是問題
陳亞聖最近的消息是輔大備取,不過他跟林柏翔半斤八兩,前途不樂觀
我比較喜歡的林正跟譚傑龍雖然後續可期,但協調性跟彈性之外
兩個球員都只能以"稚嫩"來含蓄形容......
再看看單以身材論最接近岱豪的李德威跟劉元凱
還有其他白隊的、今天SBSL的新人
真的就是比不上現在的岱豪!
我們除非能迅速轉換球風,讓OTIS之流來操練我們的壓迫防守跟快速反擊
再配合一個新的、有活動力的洋將
否則在現在的球風中,半場體系未來五年只會出現曾田吳看誰輪流傷退
補一個周柏臣或李德威
而對照一個也受傷的壘哥現在的表現........
我想現在酸吳的,也後也會開始酸壘哥吧
而到時候支持壘哥的球迷,大概就能明白我的心情了。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 163.28.16.40
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/basketballTW/M.1441124477.A.F03.html
推
09/02 00:24, , 1F
09/02 00:24, 1F
→
09/02 00:25, , 2F
09/02 00:25, 2F
→
09/02 00:26, , 3F
09/02 00:26, 3F
→
09/02 00:26, , 4F
09/02 00:26, 4F
→
09/02 00:27, , 5F
09/02 00:27, 5F
→
09/02 00:30, , 6F
09/02 00:30, 6F
→
09/02 00:30, , 7F
09/02 00:30, 7F
→
09/02 00:30, , 8F
09/02 00:30, 8F
推
09/02 00:30, , 9F
09/02 00:30, 9F
推
09/02 00:31, , 10F
09/02 00:31, 10F
→
09/02 00:31, , 11F
09/02 00:31, 11F
→
09/02 00:31, , 12F
09/02 00:31, 12F
→
09/02 00:32, , 13F
09/02 00:32, 13F
→
09/02 00:32, , 14F
09/02 00:32, 14F
推
09/02 00:32, , 15F
09/02 00:32, 15F
→
09/02 00:34, , 16F
09/02 00:34, 16F
→
09/02 00:34, , 17F
09/02 00:34, 17F
→
09/02 00:35, , 18F
09/02 00:35, 18F
→
09/02 00:36, , 19F
09/02 00:36, 19F
→
09/02 00:36, , 20F
09/02 00:36, 20F
→
09/02 00:36, , 21F
09/02 00:36, 21F
→
09/02 00:36, , 22F
09/02 00:36, 22F
→
09/02 00:37, , 23F
09/02 00:37, 23F
推
09/02 00:39, , 24F
09/02 00:39, 24F
→
09/02 00:39, , 25F
09/02 00:39, 25F
→
09/02 00:40, , 26F
09/02 00:40, 26F
推
09/02 00:41, , 27F
09/02 00:41, 27F
推
09/02 00:43, , 28F
09/02 00:43, 28F
→
09/02 00:45, , 29F
09/02 00:45, 29F
→
09/02 00:47, , 30F
09/02 00:47, 30F
→
09/02 00:48, , 31F
09/02 00:48, 31F
→
09/02 00:48, , 32F
09/02 00:48, 32F
→
09/02 00:49, , 33F
09/02 00:49, 33F
→
09/02 00:50, , 34F
09/02 00:50, 34F
→
09/02 00:50, , 35F
09/02 00:50, 35F
推
09/02 00:51, , 36F
09/02 00:51, 36F
→
09/02 00:52, , 37F
09/02 00:52, 37F
→
09/02 00:52, , 38F
09/02 00:52, 38F
→
09/02 00:53, , 39F
09/02 00:53, 39F
還有 52 則推文
→
09/02 09:24, , 92F
09/02 09:24, 92F
推
09/02 09:38, , 93F
09/02 09:38, 93F
推
09/02 09:42, , 94F
09/02 09:42, 94F
→
09/02 11:00, , 95F
09/02 11:00, 95F
→
09/02 11:02, , 96F
09/02 11:02, 96F
推
09/02 11:14, , 97F
09/02 11:14, 97F
推
09/02 11:18, , 98F
09/02 11:18, 98F
推
09/02 12:06, , 99F
09/02 12:06, 99F
推
09/02 12:17, , 100F
09/02 12:17, 100F
推
09/02 12:19, , 101F
09/02 12:19, 101F
→
09/02 12:19, , 102F
09/02 12:19, 102F
推
09/02 13:23, , 103F
09/02 13:23, 103F
→
09/02 13:24, , 104F
09/02 13:24, 104F
→
09/02 13:25, , 105F
09/02 13:25, 105F
推
09/02 13:30, , 106F
09/02 13:30, 106F
→
09/02 13:31, , 107F
09/02 13:31, 107F
→
09/02 13:41, , 108F
09/02 13:41, 108F
推
09/02 14:18, , 109F
09/02 14:18, 109F
推
09/02 17:11, , 110F
09/02 17:11, 110F
→
09/02 17:13, , 111F
09/02 17:13, 111F
→
09/02 17:15, , 112F
09/02 17:15, 112F
→
09/02 17:16, , 113F
09/02 17:16, 113F
→
09/02 17:16, , 114F
09/02 17:16, 114F
→
09/02 17:17, , 115F
09/02 17:17, 115F
→
09/02 17:18, , 116F
09/02 17:18, 116F
→
09/02 17:19, , 117F
09/02 17:19, 117F
→
09/02 17:19, , 118F
09/02 17:19, 118F
推
09/02 17:28, , 119F
09/02 17:28, 119F
→
09/02 17:29, , 120F
09/02 17:29, 120F
推
09/02 18:02, , 121F
09/02 18:02, 121F
推
09/02 22:12, , 122F
09/02 22:12, 122F
→
09/02 22:13, , 123F
09/02 22:13, 123F
→
09/02 22:14, , 124F
09/02 22:14, 124F
→
09/02 22:15, , 125F
09/02 22:15, 125F
→
09/02 22:16, , 126F
09/02 22:16, 126F
推
09/03 17:03, , 127F
09/03 17:03, 127F
推
09/03 17:57, , 128F
09/03 17:57, 128F
→
09/03 17:58, , 129F
09/03 17:58, 129F
→
09/03 17:59, , 130F
09/03 17:59, 130F
→
09/03 18:01, , 131F
09/03 18:01, 131F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):