Re: automata

看板b94902HW作者 ( )時間16年前 (2008/01/18 13:32), 編輯推噓4(403)
留言7則, 5人參與, 最新討論串4/5 (看更多)
※ 引述《thirddawn (白夜)》之銘言: : ※ 引述《ChihJen ( )》之銘言: : : So as expected, some complained. : : I apologize again about the trouble of the 4th question. : : But I do think we should do something as that question isn't that : : proper. There is no perfect solution, and I can only make : : one decision. : : Anyway, if you guys thinks that removing those 10 is better, : : we can do so. But note that we will use the same formula to : : calculate your scores. : : Thanks : : Chih-Jen : 如果老師希望詢問一個能夠決定10分是否要計算的方法 : 或許可以以投票的型式詢問大家的意見 : 終究當時相信老師也是有聽過另一邊的聲音才決定要進行這個分數的調整 : 固然有人覺得不公 也會有人覺得這是必要的分數 : 如果單純因一兩個去反應的人去進行調整(不論是決定要加分 或是決定不加分) : 也許都不是十分理想 : 謝謝 so we have two choices for the 4th problem: 1. min(original+10, 25) 2. original And we will use the SAME formula for your scores. So which one of the above two you guys prefer? BTW, I will submit your scores to school this afternoon. After that, it's impossible to change scores. Chih-Jen -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.30.33

01/18 13:35, , 1F
好像很多人說要統一加十分
01/18 13:35, 1F

01/18 13:54, , 2F
老師不考慮看看統一加十分的處理方式嗎?
01/18 13:54, 2F

01/18 14:55, , 3F
這兩個選擇方案..應該沒有同學會選2吧
01/18 14:55, 3F

01/18 14:55, , 4F
the first is unfair!? the second is not implementable!
01/18 14:55, 4F

01/18 14:56, , 5F
because you already gave out the extra points and you
01/18 14:56, 5F

01/18 14:57, , 6F
don't know who got those 10 points.
01/18 14:57, 6F

01/18 15:04, , 7F
We have the original grade....
01/18 15:04, 7F
文章代碼(AID): #17a3dzoi (b94902HW)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
以下文章回應了本文
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 5 篇):
-1
9
文章代碼(AID): #17a3dzoi (b94902HW)