[閒聊] 聖結石 howhow之流會紅 是年輕世代的墮落
最近發現聖結石 HowFun 上班不要看......等youtuber
在年輕世代之間竄紅
屏除一些知識性的 youtuber
我上面舉的這些這些 youtuber 之間的特色各不相同
但基本上 拍的東西都是沒有什麼內容深度
沒什麼知識水平 沒有啟發性成長性
你日復一日的看這些內容也無法獲得什麼成長
而且我發現他們的粉絲都有一個特色
明明都是屬於同一層級的水準
看的東西都一樣沒有深度 卻彼此看不起
我看聖結石好棒棒 但你看上班不要看好低級好沒水準
我看HowFun好棒棒 但你看聖結石就是幼稚
這些youtuber的爆紅
是否說明了那些喜歡嘲笑老人的年輕世代
其實本身水準也高明不到哪裡去?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.42.160.120
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WomenTalk/M.1504357364.A.22B.html
→
09/02 21:03, , 1F
09/02 21:03, 1F
這樣就戰? 還好吧?
單純陳述事實
※ 編輯: HelloP (114.42.160.120), 09/02/2017 21:04:38
推
09/02 21:04, , 2F
09/02 21:04, 2F
噓
09/02 21:04, , 3F
09/02 21:04, 3F
※ 編輯: HelloP (114.42.160.120), 09/02/2017 21:05:36
→
09/02 21:05, , 4F
09/02 21:05, 4F
→
09/02 21:05, , 5F
09/02 21:05, 5F
那你可以告訴我
我上面提到的 聖結石 HowFun 上班不要看
的內容深度在哪?
※ 編輯: HelloP (114.42.160.120), 09/02/2017 21:06:52
推
09/02 21:08, , 6F
09/02 21:08, 6F
推
09/02 21:08, , 7F
09/02 21:08, 7F
推
09/02 21:08, , 8F
09/02 21:08, 8F
噓
09/02 21:08, , 9F
09/02 21:08, 9F
噓
09/02 21:09, , 10F
09/02 21:09, 10F
呵呵 果然馬上驗證我說的話
覺得自己看的東西才是高檔次 別人是低檔次
殊不知其實半斤八兩 大家都相同水準
你可以論述一下 你的howhow檔次是高在哪?
※ 編輯: HelloP (114.42.160.120), 09/02/2017 21:12:22
推
09/02 21:10, , 11F
09/02 21:10, 11F
→
09/02 21:10, , 12F
09/02 21:10, 12F
噓
09/02 21:12, , 13F
09/02 21:12, 13F
→
09/02 21:12, , 14F
09/02 21:12, 14F
→
09/02 21:13, , 15F
09/02 21:13, 15F
→
09/02 21:13, , 16F
09/02 21:13, 16F
噓
09/02 21:13, , 17F
09/02 21:13, 17F
→
09/02 21:13, , 18F
09/02 21:13, 18F
推
09/02 21:17, , 19F
09/02 21:17, 19F
→
09/02 21:17, , 20F
09/02 21:17, 20F
噓
09/02 21:19, , 21F
09/02 21:19, 21F
推
09/02 21:19, , 22F
09/02 21:19, 22F
噓
09/02 21:20, , 23F
09/02 21:20, 23F
→
09/02 21:20, , 24F
09/02 21:20, 24F
噓
09/02 21:20, , 25F
09/02 21:20, 25F
→
09/02 21:21, , 26F
09/02 21:21, 26F
→
09/02 21:23, , 27F
09/02 21:23, 27F
→
09/02 21:23, , 28F
09/02 21:23, 28F
噓
09/02 21:26, , 29F
09/02 21:26, 29F
→
09/02 21:26, , 30F
09/02 21:26, 30F
推
09/02 21:26, , 31F
09/02 21:26, 31F
→
09/02 21:27, , 32F
09/02 21:27, 32F
推
09/02 21:27, , 33F
09/02 21:27, 33F
→
09/02 21:28, , 34F
09/02 21:28, 34F
→
09/02 21:28, , 35F
09/02 21:28, 35F
還有 119 則推文
還有 2 段內文
推
09/03 04:06, , 155F
09/03 04:06, 155F
→
09/03 04:06, , 156F
09/03 04:06, 156F
噓
09/03 05:57, , 157F
09/03 05:57, 157F
噓
09/03 06:17, , 158F
09/03 06:17, 158F
→
09/03 06:17, , 159F
09/03 06:17, 159F
噓
09/03 06:33, , 160F
09/03 06:33, 160F
噓
09/03 07:39, , 161F
09/03 07:39, 161F
噓
09/03 08:33, , 162F
09/03 08:33, 162F
噓
09/03 08:52, , 163F
09/03 08:52, 163F
噓
09/03 09:15, , 164F
09/03 09:15, 164F
→
09/03 09:15, , 165F
09/03 09:15, 165F
→
09/03 09:15, , 166F
09/03 09:15, 166F
→
09/03 09:20, , 167F
09/03 09:20, 167F
推
09/03 09:28, , 168F
09/03 09:28, 168F
推
09/03 09:47, , 169F
09/03 09:47, 169F
推
09/03 09:53, , 170F
09/03 09:53, 170F
噓
09/03 10:01, , 171F
09/03 10:01, 171F
推
09/03 10:39, , 172F
09/03 10:39, 172F
噓
09/03 11:03, , 173F
09/03 11:03, 173F
噓
09/03 11:08, , 174F
09/03 11:08, 174F
噓
09/03 12:01, , 175F
09/03 12:01, 175F
推
09/03 13:23, , 176F
09/03 13:23, 176F
→
09/03 13:27, , 177F
09/03 13:27, 177F
→
09/03 14:23, , 178F
09/03 14:23, 178F
噓
09/03 15:18, , 179F
09/03 15:18, 179F
噓
09/03 16:00, , 180F
09/03 16:00, 180F
噓
09/03 16:56, , 181F
09/03 16:56, 181F
→
09/03 16:56, , 182F
09/03 16:56, 182F
噓
09/03 19:22, , 183F
09/03 19:22, 183F
推
09/04 06:37, , 184F
09/04 06:37, 184F
→
09/04 06:37, , 185F
09/04 06:37, 185F
推
09/04 08:47, , 186F
09/04 08:47, 186F
噓
09/04 09:15, , 187F
09/04 09:15, 187F
噓
09/05 11:39, , 188F
09/05 11:39, 188F
噓
09/05 13:24, , 189F
09/05 13:24, 189F
噓
09/06 04:53, , 190F
09/06 04:53, 190F
推
09/06 11:04, , 191F
09/06 11:04, 191F
噓
09/06 17:27, , 192F
09/06 17:27, 192F
噓
09/06 19:40, , 193F
09/06 19:40, 193F
噓
12/31 00:06, , 194F
12/31 00:06, 194F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 6 篇):