[閒聊] 做喜歡的工作還是做錢比較多的工作已回收
大家會選擇做喜歡的工作?
還是不喜歡、很無聊、不想上班可是錢比較多的工作?
舉例(更改價差)
1是 30k 很喜歡的工作
2是 50k 錢多無聊的工作(無聊=非興趣取向)
(這只是舉例...當然會有其他價格與價差!!!!)
當然可以找到喜歡錢多到最好
假設只有兩種可以選擇大家會選哪個?
以前覺得自己受得了為了錢
做了才發現哎呀好像不是那麼好熬QQ
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 219.85.115.28
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WomenTalk/M.1476106760.A.324.html
※ 編輯: hyun0607 (219.85.115.28), 10/10/2016 21:40:46
噓
10/10 21:41, , 1F
10/10 21:41, 1F
話是沒錯啦~
→
10/10 21:43, , 2F
10/10 21:43, 2F
這的確也是一點!!
推
10/10 21:44, , 3F
10/10 21:44, 3F
→
10/10 21:45, , 4F
10/10 21:45, 4F
舉例而已啦
推
10/10 21:47, , 5F
10/10 21:47, 5F
工作無聊指的是不是自己的興趣取向
噓
10/10 21:47, , 6F
10/10 21:47, 6F
舉例而已
→
10/10 22:02, , 7F
10/10 22:02, 7F
→
10/10 22:03, , 8F
10/10 22:03, 8F
推
10/10 22:04, , 9F
10/10 22:04, 9F
→
10/10 22:04, , 10F
10/10 22:04, 10F
→
10/10 22:04, , 11F
10/10 22:04, 11F
推
10/10 22:05, , 12F
10/10 22:05, 12F
81k是什麼梗嗎
推
10/10 22:11, , 13F
10/10 22:11, 13F
推
10/10 22:12, , 14F
10/10 22:12, 14F
推
10/10 22:14, , 15F
10/10 22:14, 15F
→
10/10 22:15, , 16F
10/10 22:15, 16F
在台北好像不算高QQ
推
10/10 22:16, , 17F
10/10 22:16, 17F
→
10/10 22:16, , 18F
10/10 22:16, 18F
我也是快樂取向,不過推文蠻多賺錢取向~
推
10/10 22:17, , 19F
10/10 22:17, 19F
舉例啦...
推
10/10 22:17, , 20F
10/10 22:17, 20F
→
10/10 22:20, , 21F
10/10 22:20, 21F
QQ
推
10/10 22:20, , 22F
10/10 22:20, 22F
推
10/10 22:22, , 23F
10/10 22:22, 23F
推
10/10 22:22, , 24F
10/10 22:22, 24F
→
10/10 22:22, , 25F
10/10 22:22, 25F
推
10/10 22:22, , 26F
10/10 22:22, 26F
推
10/10 22:23, , 27F
10/10 22:23, 27F
→
10/10 22:23, , 28F
10/10 22:23, 28F
→
10/10 22:23, , 29F
10/10 22:23, 29F
還有 34 則推文
還有 12 段內文
→
10/11 00:05, , 64F
10/11 00:05, 64F
推
10/11 00:24, , 65F
10/11 00:24, 65F
→
10/11 00:24, , 66F
10/11 00:24, 66F
→
10/11 00:25, , 67F
10/11 00:25, 67F
→
10/11 00:25, , 68F
10/11 00:25, 68F
→
10/11 00:25, , 69F
10/11 00:25, 69F
→
10/11 00:29, , 70F
10/11 00:29, 70F
→
10/11 00:29, , 71F
10/11 00:29, 71F
→
10/11 00:32, , 72F
10/11 00:32, 72F
→
10/11 00:34, , 73F
10/11 00:34, 73F
→
10/11 00:34, , 74F
10/11 00:34, 74F
推
10/11 00:59, , 75F
10/11 00:59, 75F
→
10/11 00:59, , 76F
10/11 00:59, 76F
→
10/11 01:00, , 77F
10/11 01:00, 77F
→
10/11 01:00, , 78F
10/11 01:00, 78F
推
10/11 01:01, , 79F
10/11 01:01, 79F
→
10/11 01:10, , 80F
10/11 01:10, 80F
→
10/11 01:12, , 81F
10/11 01:12, 81F
推
10/11 01:15, , 82F
10/11 01:15, 82F
推
10/11 02:19, , 83F
10/11 02:19, 83F
→
10/11 02:19, , 84F
10/11 02:19, 84F
→
10/11 02:20, , 85F
10/11 02:20, 85F
推
10/11 03:12, , 86F
10/11 03:12, 86F
→
10/11 04:01, , 87F
10/11 04:01, 87F
推
10/11 04:23, , 88F
10/11 04:23, 88F
推
10/11 05:09, , 89F
10/11 05:09, 89F
推
10/11 07:54, , 90F
10/11 07:54, 90F
→
10/11 07:54, , 91F
10/11 07:54, 91F
推
10/11 09:35, , 92F
10/11 09:35, 92F
推
10/11 09:54, , 93F
10/11 09:54, 93F
推
10/11 10:22, , 94F
10/11 10:22, 94F
推
10/11 11:11, , 95F
10/11 11:11, 95F
推
10/11 11:16, , 96F
10/11 11:16, 96F
推
10/11 14:03, , 97F
10/11 14:03, 97F
→
10/11 14:03, , 98F
10/11 14:03, 98F
推
10/11 18:49, , 99F
10/11 18:49, 99F
推
10/11 20:19, , 100F
10/11 20:19, 100F
推
10/11 21:22, , 101F
10/11 21:22, 101F
→
10/11 23:54, , 102F
10/11 23:54, 102F
推
10/12 00:20, , 103F
10/12 00:20, 103F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):