[討論] 陣前一起倒戈投敵,戰後待遇卻大不相同
看板WarringState作者KantoTandai (KantoTandai)時間9年前 (2015/03/22 01:34)推噓13(13推 0噓 43→)留言56則, 15人參與討論串1/3 (看更多)
發生在慶長五年九月十五日的關原之戰,東西兩軍原本僵持不下的膠著戰況,西軍在小早
川秀秋叛變下山後,開始土崩瓦解
但在這裡還有一段,大谷吉繼事前已預測小早川秀秋可能叛變,派出直屬部隊狙擊小早川
秀秋大軍,小早川軍一度被逼退數次,但在此時,原屬大谷吉繼指揮下的脇坂安治、朽木
元綱、小川祐忠、赤座直保等四部隊約4300人,突然叛變投靠東軍,大谷軍被叛變的兩支
西軍部隊兩面包圍消滅,東軍各部隊趁勢追擊,整個西軍也因此而瓦解潰敗
一起倒戈叛變的脇坂安治、朽木元綱、小川祐忠、赤座直保四位大名,戰後的命運卻大不
相同
脇坂安治原有的淡路三萬三千石領地"本領安堵",九年後的慶長十四年再加增移封為伊
予五萬三千五百石
朽木元綱原有的近江兩萬石領地,被德川家康以事前沒有表態站在東軍為由,被減封為九
千五百九十石,惟仍保有大名身分
小川祐忠原有的伊予七萬石領地,也是被德川家康以事前沒有表態站在東軍,加上領內惡
政為由,領地被改易全數沒收
赤座直保原有的越前兩萬石領地,也是被德川家康以事前沒有表態站在東軍為由,被改易
全數沒收
小弟基本上認為就常理來說,這四個人既然是陣前一起倒戈叛變,事前基本上應該有互相
聯絡,多少都會有取得東軍的"到時候我們會叛變喔的默契",那為何戰後的處置待遇大
不相同?
這四個人有兩個被全部沒收領地,一個被減半領地,待遇最好的一個的脇坂安治也僅僅是
"本領安堵",九年後才加封,跟小早川秀秋從筑前三十萬七千石加封到岡山五十五萬石
,境遇天差地遠
有原因或內情嗎?真是讓我想不透啊~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.46.206.102
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WarringState/M.1426959278.A.862.html
推
03/22 06:07, , 1F
03/22 06:07, 1F
→
03/22 09:11, , 2F
03/22 09:11, 2F
→
03/22 09:12, , 3F
03/22 09:12, 3F
→
03/22 09:13, , 4F
03/22 09:13, 4F
→
03/22 09:14, , 5F
03/22 09:14, 5F
→
03/22 09:14, , 6F
03/22 09:14, 6F
→
03/22 09:17, , 7F
03/22 09:17, 7F
→
03/22 09:21, , 8F
03/22 09:21, 8F
→
03/22 09:21, , 9F
03/22 09:21, 9F
→
03/22 09:25, , 10F
03/22 09:25, 10F
推
03/22 09:27, , 11F
03/22 09:27, 11F
推
03/22 09:51, , 12F
03/22 09:51, 12F
→
03/22 09:54, , 13F
03/22 09:54, 13F
→
03/22 09:58, , 14F
03/22 09:58, 14F
→
03/22 10:01, , 15F
03/22 10:01, 15F
→
03/22 10:03, , 16F
03/22 10:03, 16F
→
03/22 10:04, , 17F
03/22 10:04, 17F
看網路資料,小早川秀秋倒戈下松尾山後,這地區的布陣是這樣子的
大谷吉繼部(含戶田及平塚)7000
赤座直保600
小川祐忠2100 小早川秀秋15600
朽木元綱600
脇坂安治1000
很明顯的,號稱事前有聲明會倒戈的脇坂軍只有1000人,我覺得這四個人應該都是事先有
跟東軍有約好同時倒戈,不然脇坂軍在倒戈時,必須面對旁邊3300人,自身的損失也會不
小
推
03/22 11:00, , 18F
03/22 11:00, 18F
→
03/22 11:01, , 19F
03/22 11:01, 19F
→
03/22 11:03, , 20F
03/22 11:03, 20F
→
03/22 11:03, , 21F
03/22 11:03, 21F
推
03/22 13:14, , 22F
03/22 13:14, 22F
→
03/22 13:14, , 23F
03/22 13:14, 23F
推
03/22 13:21, , 24F
03/22 13:21, 24F
→
03/22 13:24, , 25F
03/22 13:24, 25F
→
03/22 14:49, , 26F
03/22 14:49, 26F
推
03/22 16:35, , 27F
03/22 16:35, 27F
→
03/22 16:36, , 28F
03/22 16:36, 28F
→
03/22 16:37, , 29F
03/22 16:37, 29F
→
03/22 16:38, , 30F
03/22 16:38, 30F
→
03/22 16:39, , 31F
03/22 16:39, 31F
→
03/22 20:17, , 32F
03/22 20:17, 32F
推
03/22 21:02, , 33F
03/22 21:02, 33F
→
03/22 21:03, , 34F
03/22 21:03, 34F
→
03/22 21:05, , 35F
03/22 21:05, 35F
choseone大,我了解您的意思,但我記得以前有看過一份資料,這四個人似乎是同時倒戈
的,而不是先後倒戈
推
03/22 21:23, , 36F
03/22 21:23, 36F
※ 編輯: KantoTandai (114.38.34.88), 03/23/2015 12:49:20
推
03/23 13:34, , 37F
03/23 13:34, 37F
→
03/23 13:35, , 38F
03/23 13:35, 38F
→
03/23 13:35, , 39F
03/23 13:35, 39F
→
03/23 13:36, , 40F
03/23 13:36, 40F
→
03/23 13:37, , 41F
03/23 13:37, 41F
→
03/23 13:38, , 42F
03/23 13:38, 42F
→
03/23 13:39, , 43F
03/23 13:39, 43F
→
03/23 13:40, , 44F
03/23 13:40, 44F
→
03/23 13:41, , 45F
03/23 13:41, 45F
→
03/23 13:41, , 46F
03/23 13:41, 46F
→
03/23 14:43, , 47F
03/23 14:43, 47F
→
03/23 14:44, , 48F
03/23 14:44, 48F
→
03/23 14:45, , 49F
03/23 14:45, 49F
推
03/23 16:14, , 50F
03/23 16:14, 50F
推
03/23 17:06, , 51F
03/23 17:06, 51F
→
03/23 17:07, , 52F
03/23 17:07, 52F
→
03/23 17:07, , 53F
03/23 17:07, 53F
推
03/24 01:38, , 54F
03/24 01:38, 54F
→
03/24 01:40, , 55F
03/24 01:40, 55F
→
03/24 01:42, , 56F
03/24 01:42, 56F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):