[情報] 5/28 Q&A

看板Wargaming作者hsinhanchu (hsinhanchu)時間11年前 (2013/05/29 01:00)推噓7(7推 0噓 3→)

留言10則, 10人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)

SS休息一天之後回來啦。補：抱歉忘記附上今天最重要的東西 8.5/8.6彈著分布圖這是8.5 http://i.imgur.com/3tcqQW3.jpg

精度提升(更多砲彈落點偏向中心) 準度不變(整個散布圈的大小一樣) - SerB has roughly 50 vehicles in his garage and it takes him 5 seconds to sort thru it SerB大約有50台車，瀏覽一遍大概要5秒(這麼快?) - 5.1 sound is not yet implemented into the new sound engine, but it is planned, along with the 7.1 sound 目前沒有5.1聲道，但是5.1和7.1都在規劃中 - echoes from distant explosion/cannon fire (for example in valleys) will be implemented eventually 砲聲/爆炸聲的回音總有一天會完工的 - better sorting of the archievements will be implemented eventually, but it has very low priority 未來會對成就(SS打錯字?)分類，不過開發順序非常低。 - some vehicles have AAMG and some don't (resp. Type 58 doesn't have it), because "machinegun model consists of too many model details (SS: SerB said specifically "triangles", I am pretty sure there is an English term for what he meant: is it "vectors"?) 有些車有把防空機槍做出來，有些沒有，原因是機槍模型超級不好做。 - the E-100 turret was moved in 0.8.6 30cm forwards, because it's historical 依據史實，E-100的砲塔在8.6會往前拉30公分 - German E-10 ingame will be implemented as a TD, not LT E-10會以TD而非LT出場 (如果目前流出資訊的引擎馬力沒有變動，這東西會和ELC差不多快...) - SerB doesn't consider the "In development" section necessery SerB不認為「開發中」(官網的資訊?)有必要 - arty won't recieve bigger firing angle than 45 degrees (SS: a player was asking, whether it is possible to implement the arty to be able to hit a certain target using two different trajectories - one for below 45 degrees and one for above 45 degrees elevation) SPG的仰角不會高於45度(SS：某個玩家建議讓SPG可以選擇兩種射擊角度，一種低於45 度，一種高於45度) - according to SerB, the best account protection is using your brain, for example not using "password1234" as your password SerB表示保護遊戲帳號的最佳方式是用一下大腦，例如說，不要設定"password1234" 當密碼。 - fog of war was considered for random battles, but it won't be implemented for now, same goes for companies 戰爭迷霧(發現前不知道車種)有考慮過放到隨機戰鬥中，但是目前不會採用，TC也不會。 (我是覺得可以放，但是至少該讓玩家知道幾階車有幾台) - Q: "SerB, how is it possible you have so many battles played, yet your effectivity sucks?" A: "That's because I prefer to improve in real world and to only have fun and relax in the virtual one. Which is something I recommend to you too." 「SerB，你玩了很多場，可是你的效率值超爛的耶」「本人主要玩人生Online，WoT只是玩爽的，而且我建議你主練人生Online。」 - according to SerB, there are no server-side cheats (SS: for example someone advertised a cheat for instant aiming) SerB表示沒有作弊方式是直接和伺服器連動的(某廣告宣稱有瞬間瞄準外掛) - SerB was banned only once in WoT, it was a trolling from someone SerB被鎖過一次帳號，某個人整他的結果。 - it's possible that the T69 gold ammo (300 pen) penetration will be nerfed (despite the fact SerB claims that the 300 pen is historical) T69的HEAT穿甲可能會調降，即使SerB說過那個300是史實。 - the crew national voices might still appear 各國的組員語音可能會做 (希望中文不要出現太慘重的災情...) - the E-100 turret move forward does not mean improved depression or elevation E-100砲塔往前移動不會改變俯仰角。 - SerB is playing the VK4502 Ausf.B (30k XP left to Maus) and is happy with its gameplay SerB目前正在玩4502B，差三萬經驗點出老鼠，而且玩得挺開心的。 - historically, ST-I shouldn't even have the M62-T2 gun, eg. it's pointless to compare its ROF to IS-8 (SerB is joking about replacing the gun with the historical D-30) 史實上ST-I沒有M-62T2，所以拿IS-8的射速來比較沒有意義(我對這段的理解：大概是有人拿T-10M─也就是裝了M-62T2的IS8─的射速來對比ST-I的數據，然後要求buff或 nerf) SerB:再吵我就把ST-I的砲換回D-30(IS-6用同一款122砲) - it's generally possible the ST-II (ST-I with twin-linked D-30) will be introduced, because the twin-linked gun mechanism is easier to introduce than for example multiturret mechanism. However don't think it will simply have double ROF, that would be way too OP. Another historical option would apparently be two D-10T guns. 基本上ST-II(ST-I裝兩管並列的D-30)是可以引入遊戲的，因為雙主砲比雙砲塔好做。不過不要期待雙主砲的車會有兩倍射速，因為這樣會太OP。另外一個可能的選項是兩管100 mm D-10T - SerB is thinking (SS: but only thinking, no panic!) about removing the top IS-4 gun (because it's unhistorical) and buffing the shells of the other one. SerB正在「思考(SS：只是思考而已，不要反應過度)」要不要把M-62T2從IS4上面拔掉 (因為不符合史實)，然後給IS-4的D-25T一些buff。 -- Q: "Dear developers, does WoT generate so little profit that you have to reduce the profitability of the tanks?" A: "Dear players, do you play so bad that you have to imagine the profitability drops all the time?" -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.35.123.188

→

ChinHuiTsao

05/29 01:02, , 1^F

05/29 01:02, 1^F

推

Pegasus99

05/29 01:03, , 2^F

05/29 01:03, 2^F

推

r0930

05/29 01:08, , 3^F

05/29 01:08, 3^F