Re: [大負雷] 怒火特攻隊
※ 引述《annakarina (新浪潮旗手)》之銘言:
: ※ [本文轉錄自 movie 看板 #1KU8JCiC ]
: 作者: AlainDelon (午後七點零七分) 看板: movie
: 標題: [大負雷] 怒火特攻隊
: 時間: Fri Nov 28 22:20:57 2014
: 另外現實中 也不會有這種英勇的場景 因為虎式戰車可以在兩公里外擊破M4
: 大部分的情況下都是美軍裝甲兵搞不清楚狀況就一命嗚呼了
Tiger可以在兩公里以外擊毀敵方戰車是事實,不過僅僅出現在極少數的狀態下。
http://www.fprado.com/armorsite/tiger1-03.htm
The 13.(Tiger) Kompanie, of Panzer Regiment Großdeutschland,
reported on the performance of the 88 mm KwK 36 L/56, when their Tigers
engaged the T-34: "First round hits were usually achieved at ranges between
800 to 1,000 meters.
Under combat situations, judging from the Tiger units action reports, the
most effective engagement range for the Tiger I was between 800 and 1,200
meters, and kills beyond 2,000 meters were considered lucky hits.
這事實上是跟瞄準器具有關,超過1200 m的命中性實在是說不上好。
另外我們再看其他對戰紀錄:
http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/28/please-dont-use-the-5-m4s-1-panther-myth/
The average distance at which a US tank kills a Panzer(late IV, V, & VI) was
893 yards(816 m). Comparatively the average distance Panzers killed US
vehicles as 943 yards(862 m).
有沒有發現,如果以豹式戰車為例,他的平均擊殺距離約在800-900公尺之間。豹式的75
砲穿甲能力並不下於虎式的88砲,但因為戰場環境跟瞄具的問題,平均擊殺距離只比美式
戰車稍長一些。因此,長距離穿甲能力帶來的優勢並沒有你想像中的大。西線戰場畢竟不
比東線,視界受限的狀態很多..
我們再看其他的描述。
http://www.kbismarck.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=3722
In Dec 1944, in a forest in France, 1 King Tiger met 2 Sherman 76mm. The
Tiger fired first and destroyed 1 Sherman, but in the mean time, the second
Sherman scored 2 penetrating hits, which set the Tiger aflame. The engagement
was fought at about 500m and the shells penetrated the lateral turret armor.
西線,接戰距離500m。雖然另外你也可以看到很多虎式在東西線屠殺的戰例,但1:4然後
擊毀落單虎式的狀態真的不能叫做奇蹟..
--
我如無根之萍 ꄠ ꄠ
尋無棲身灣港 ◥▓◤
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-Oo.-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
o O o o ꄪ
o o O
o o o O ꄪ
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 116.89.49.41
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Warfare/M.1417244085.A.0D5.html
→
11/29 15:09, , 1F
11/29 15:09, 1F
推
11/29 16:28, , 2F
11/29 16:28, 2F
推
11/29 17:06, , 3F
11/29 17:06, 3F
推
11/29 19:12, , 4F
11/29 19:12, 4F
推
11/29 19:59, , 5F
11/29 19:59, 5F
推
11/29 21:44, , 6F
11/29 21:44, 6F
推
11/29 21:53, , 7F
11/29 21:53, 7F
→
11/29 21:56, , 8F
11/29 21:56, 8F
推
11/29 22:55, , 9F
11/29 22:55, 9F
推
11/29 23:18, , 10F
11/29 23:18, 10F
→
11/29 23:18, , 11F
11/29 23:18, 11F
→
11/30 00:29, , 12F
11/30 00:29, 12F
→
11/30 00:29, , 13F
11/30 00:29, 13F
推
11/30 00:57, , 14F
11/30 00:57, 14F
→
11/30 00:58, , 15F
11/30 00:58, 15F
推
11/30 01:51, , 16F
11/30 01:51, 16F
→
11/30 20:27, , 17F
11/30 20:27, 17F
推
11/30 20:43, , 18F
11/30 20:43, 18F
→
11/30 20:44, , 19F
11/30 20:44, 19F
→
11/30 20:45, , 20F
11/30 20:45, 20F
推
11/30 20:46, , 21F
11/30 20:46, 21F
→
11/30 20:55, , 22F
11/30 20:55, 22F
→
11/30 20:55, , 23F
11/30 20:55, 23F
→
11/30 20:57, , 24F
11/30 20:57, 24F
→
11/30 20:57, , 25F
11/30 20:57, 25F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 6 篇):