Re: [轉錄][笑話] 英國人是如何損法國人的
剛剛在The Times的線上新聞看到這則報導
正好底下有英國鄉民第一手的回應
茲抄錄幾則以娛板眾
這則新聞即前陣子,索馬利亞海盜誤挑上一艘法國軍艦踢到鐵板
The Times的標題及內容也頗中規中矩:
"Pirates choose wrong target - a French warship"
精彩的是下面網友的回應
- Sarath Palety wrote:
Perhaps the pirates thought that the French warship would surrender?
(譯:大概海盜認為法國佬會投降?)
- Alex Morris wrote:
Harry Key
What's stupid about commenting on the surrender prospects of a vessel
that originates from a country with form for surrendering when they
really didn't need to?
(譯:對Harry Key的回應 -- 對於一艘來自一個隨便投降的國家的船艦,說他
們搞不好會投降有錯嗎?)
- Sam C wrote:
It was not an unreasonable assumption on the part of the Somali pirates
that a French naval vessel would run up the white flag. The only
surprising thing about this story is that they did not, perhaps the
pirates just got there first
(譯:猜測法國船會昇白旗繞跑一點都不會不合理,這條新聞最令人驚訝的是,
法國佬並沒這麼作)
然後有個稍微有良知的「正義之士」唱反調了...
- Dan Spencer wrote:
Thats a stupid thing to say. The French were for long periods the most
powerful country in Europe. The only two times they have surrendered
were in 1871 and 1940, on both occasions they were clearly defeated.
If it wasn't for our good fortune on living on an island we would have
been conquered many times by our continental enemies. Besides the
French have shown considerably more backbone in dealing with these
pirates than our own navy has. I have an MA in History btw.
(譯:你們這麼說很蠢。法國長期以來都是歐陸強權。唯一兩次投降是在1871及
1940年,那兩次他們是真的被完全擊敗了。如果不是我們好運活在一個島上,
我們早被歐陸的敵人踏平好幾次了。更何況我覺得在處理那些海盜問題方面,
法國人比我們的海軍還有骨氣多了。我可是有一個歷史碩士學位的。)
然後這位老兄就被其他鄉民同胞圍剿了。
例如:
- John Julius wrote:
Dan Spencer,
France has a very poor military history. Even the French themslves
admit it - I remember a French historian in a documentary saying, in sum,
that the French don't 'do' war - they specialise in other things.
And it's true - the French are far superior to us in certain ways, but
to suggest they are our equal on the battlefield is plain loopy. Almost
as loopy as saying a couple of miles of water are they only reason we
havn't been invaded for almost 1000 years.
Only Napoleon achieved any sort of success, and he was soon given short
shrift on land and sea by you know who.
(譯:法國人自己都承認自己的軍事史乏善可陳 -- 我記得有個法國歷史學家說過,
法國人並不「打」仗 -- 他們有別的事更擅長。
不過你要說法國佬在某些方面遠勝我們也沒錯,但說他們在戰場上與我們平分秋色
那就大錯特錯了。就跟說我們僅靠那幾哩寬的海水才維持近千年免於被侵略一樣愚
蠢。
法國佬只有拿破崙才有點搞頭,而且你知道他很快就是被誰從海上及陸上打敗的。)
我終於印證前幾天我的法國鄰居跟我的對話:
我:I heard of that your French foods are delicious.
鄰居:That's why they British hate us.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 129.12.130.137
推
10/08 19:17, , 1F
10/08 19:17, 1F
推
10/08 19:20, , 2F
10/08 19:20, 2F
推
10/08 19:21, , 3F
10/08 19:21, 3F
推
10/08 19:21, , 4F
10/08 19:21, 4F
推
10/08 19:27, , 5F
10/08 19:27, 5F
→
10/08 19:41, , 6F
10/08 19:41, 6F
推
10/08 19:46, , 7F
10/08 19:46, 7F
推
10/08 19:51, , 8F
10/08 19:51, 8F
→
10/08 19:53, , 9F
10/08 19:53, 9F
推
10/08 20:10, , 10F
10/08 20:10, 10F
推
10/08 22:27, , 11F
10/08 22:27, 11F
推
10/08 22:33, , 12F
10/08 22:33, 12F
→
10/08 22:38, , 13F
10/08 22:38, 13F
推
10/08 23:11, , 14F
10/08 23:11, 14F
推
10/08 23:14, , 15F
10/08 23:14, 15F
推
10/08 23:15, , 16F
10/08 23:15, 16F
推
10/09 01:23, , 17F
10/09 01:23, 17F
推
10/09 01:45, , 18F
10/09 01:45, 18F
推
10/09 01:49, , 19F
10/09 01:49, 19F
推
10/09 02:29, , 20F
10/09 02:29, 20F
→
10/09 02:46, , 21F
10/09 02:46, 21F
推
10/09 08:39, , 22F
10/09 08:39, 22F
推
10/09 10:27, , 23F
10/09 10:27, 23F
→
10/09 10:43, , 24F
10/09 10:43, 24F
推
10/09 10:46, , 25F
10/09 10:46, 25F
推
10/09 11:37, , 26F
10/09 11:37, 26F
推
10/09 15:08, , 27F
10/09 15:08, 27F
推
10/09 20:20, , 28F
10/09 20:20, 28F
推
10/09 22:33, , 29F
10/09 22:33, 29F
推
10/10 00:10, , 30F
10/10 00:10, 30F
→
10/10 00:13, , 31F
10/10 00:13, 31F
推
10/10 01:40, , 32F
10/10 01:40, 32F
推
10/10 02:09, , 33F
10/10 02:09, 33F
推
10/10 04:54, , 34F
10/10 04:54, 34F
→
10/10 07:50, , 35F
10/10 07:50, 35F
推
10/11 00:37, , 36F
10/11 00:37, 36F
推
10/12 00:41, , 37F
10/12 00:41, 37F
推
10/12 18:37, , 38F
10/12 18:37, 38F
推
10/12 19:11, , 39F
10/12 19:11, 39F
推
10/12 22:51, , 40F
10/12 22:51, 40F
→
08/13 06:32, , 41F
08/13 06:32, 41F
→
09/16 02:42, , 42F
09/16 02:42, 42F
→
11/08 16:55, , 43F
11/08 16:55, 43F
→
01/01 22:30,
5年前
, 44F
01/01 22:30, 44F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 13 之 14 篇):