Re: [問題] 為什麼術士心得文很少
在法系裡面,術士通常是以邪惡黑暗被看待,這樣就先刷掉一批人了
再來就是術士從以前到現在都沒有炫麗的法術特效,又刷掉一批人
牧師則是因為會補血,加上牧師這職業通常會吸引穩定的女性玩家
導致術士這麼少人玩,畢竟大部分的正常人都比較不喜歡用DOT
虐殺別人的心理變態,例如我(咦?,難怪我是邊緣人T_T
拉到現在來看
其實現在有點底子的術士,DPS是不會輸給其他職業的,雖然我
還是很想哭弱,想要BUFF,但是這是事實,去看WCL綜合職業
的排行榜,就算在都是白色的情況下,前一百還是有不少術士的(相
較於其他職業,至於有人說要肝到34點或是需要雙核心橘才有一戰
之力,我倒是覺得還好,還是有人只穿一橘或是通用雙橘就能打高的
只要能熟悉王的時間軸,其實就打得不會太低,以上。
如果真的需要資料佐證的話,再來說XD
例如我就沒有雙核心橘,也沒有點到34點喔~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 175.180.111.190
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WOW/M.1479503649.A.5EA.html
推
11/19 07:23, , 1F
11/19 07:23, 1F
→
11/19 07:23, , 2F
11/19 07:23, 2F
推
11/19 08:38, , 3F
11/19 08:38, 3F
→
11/19 09:02, , 4F
11/19 09:02, 4F
→
11/19 09:08, , 5F
11/19 09:08, 5F
→
11/19 09:12, , 6F
11/19 09:12, 6F
→
11/19 09:14, , 7F
11/19 09:14, 7F
→
11/19 09:16, , 8F
11/19 09:16, 8F
→
11/19 09:17, , 9F
11/19 09:17, 9F
→
11/19 09:20, , 10F
11/19 09:20, 10F
噓
11/19 09:22, , 11F
11/19 09:22, 11F
→
11/19 09:22, , 12F
11/19 09:22, 12F
→
11/19 09:23, , 13F
11/19 09:23, 13F
噓
11/19 09:25, , 14F
11/19 09:25, 14F
→
11/19 09:28, , 15F
11/19 09:28, 15F
推
11/19 09:28, , 16F
11/19 09:28, 16F
→
11/19 09:28, , 17F
11/19 09:28, 17F
→
11/19 09:29, , 18F
11/19 09:29, 18F
→
11/19 09:30, , 19F
11/19 09:30, 19F
→
11/19 09:30, , 20F
11/19 09:30, 20F
→
11/19 09:31, , 21F
11/19 09:31, 21F
推
11/19 09:31, , 22F
11/19 09:31, 22F
→
11/19 09:32, , 23F
11/19 09:32, 23F
→
11/19 09:32, , 24F
11/19 09:32, 24F
推
11/19 09:33, , 25F
11/19 09:33, 25F
→
11/19 09:33, , 26F
11/19 09:33, 26F
→
11/19 09:34, , 27F
11/19 09:34, 27F
→
11/19 09:34, , 28F
11/19 09:34, 28F
推
11/19 09:35, , 29F
11/19 09:35, 29F
→
11/19 09:36, , 30F
11/19 09:36, 30F
推
11/19 09:36, , 31F
11/19 09:36, 31F
→
11/19 09:37, , 32F
11/19 09:37, 32F
→
11/19 09:37, , 33F
11/19 09:37, 33F
→
11/19 09:38, , 34F
11/19 09:38, 34F
推
11/19 09:55, , 35F
11/19 09:55, 35F
推
11/19 10:05, , 36F
11/19 10:05, 36F
→
11/19 10:06, , 37F
11/19 10:06, 37F
推
11/19 10:13, , 38F
11/19 10:13, 38F
→
11/19 10:13, , 39F
11/19 10:13, 39F
還有 121 則推文
→
11/19 17:49, , 161F
11/19 17:49, 161F
→
11/19 17:50, , 162F
11/19 17:50, 162F
→
11/19 17:52, , 163F
11/19 17:52, 163F
→
11/19 17:52, , 164F
11/19 17:52, 164F
→
11/19 17:53, , 165F
11/19 17:53, 165F
→
11/19 17:53, , 166F
11/19 17:53, 166F
推
11/19 18:40, , 167F
11/19 18:40, 167F
→
11/19 18:40, , 168F
11/19 18:40, 168F
→
11/19 18:40, , 169F
11/19 18:40, 169F
→
11/19 18:40, , 170F
11/19 18:40, 170F
→
11/19 18:40, , 171F
11/19 18:40, 171F
→
11/19 18:40, , 172F
11/19 18:40, 172F
推
11/19 18:53, , 173F
11/19 18:53, 173F
→
11/19 18:53, , 174F
11/19 18:53, 174F
→
11/19 18:53, , 175F
11/19 18:53, 175F
→
11/19 18:53, , 176F
11/19 18:53, 176F
→
11/19 18:53, , 177F
11/19 18:53, 177F
→
11/19 18:53, , 178F
11/19 18:53, 178F
→
11/19 18:53, , 179F
11/19 18:53, 179F
→
11/19 19:10, , 180F
11/19 19:10, 180F
→
11/19 19:36, , 181F
11/19 19:36, 181F
→
11/19 19:36, , 182F
11/19 19:36, 182F
→
11/19 19:37, , 183F
11/19 19:37, 183F
→
11/19 19:38, , 184F
11/19 19:38, 184F
推
11/19 19:42, , 185F
11/19 19:42, 185F
→
11/19 19:43, , 186F
11/19 19:43, 186F
→
11/19 19:44, , 187F
11/19 19:44, 187F
→
11/19 19:54, , 188F
11/19 19:54, 188F
→
11/19 21:07, , 189F
11/19 21:07, 189F
推
11/19 21:15, , 190F
11/19 21:15, 190F
→
11/20 00:31, , 191F
11/20 00:31, 191F
→
11/20 09:48, , 192F
11/20 09:48, 192F
→
11/20 09:48, , 193F
11/20 09:48, 193F
推
11/20 10:51, , 194F
11/20 10:51, 194F
→
11/20 10:52, , 195F
11/20 10:52, 195F
推
11/20 14:49, , 196F
11/20 14:49, 196F
→
11/20 17:29, , 197F
11/20 17:29, 197F
推
11/20 19:32, , 198F
11/20 19:32, 198F
→
11/20 19:33, , 199F
11/20 19:33, 199F
→
11/20 19:33, , 200F
11/20 19:33, 200F
討論串 (同標題文章)