Re: [北美] 澄清申請H-1B十月不下來的爭議

看板VISA作者ahiru (地獄野鴨)時間15年前 (2010/08/23 23:02)推噓0(0推 0噓 8→)

留言8則, 2人參與討論串2/3 (看更多)

首先感謝你找了這麼多資料但是，你的解讀在我看來並不正確因為根本沒有甚麼舊制跟新制一切是應該照著C大找的這個資料跟CFR為準當然，我也對我之前推文發生的錯誤致以最高的歉意～^_^||| 你會覺得有舊制跟新制是因為你一直執著於Q＆A裡的一句話 "Once a timely filing has been made, the automatic cap-gap extension will begin and will continue until the H-1B petition adjudication process has been completed." 當你在問C大要怎麼解釋這句時你根本性的忽略一個前提這個制度是設計給大多數H-1B申請的學生其OPT+grace period的時間都到不了10/1的情形（其實通常狀況是，OPT結束時間跟H-1B的開始日都會有數月的差距）所以C大找的規定、你找的這個答案跟你找的上個答案都一直圍繞著10/1（9/30）打轉那是因為這個設計本來就是給H-1B批准在10/1號之前（雖然開始日是10/1）但因為OPT已經過期而無法工作的F-1申請者（也有人是連grace period都沒有到10/1故根本無法待在美國）所以你上面回文的資料裡在我舉出來的這句話後面他就分成H-1B准批及拒絕兩種情形在已准批的狀況裡，他就直接講說申請者可以工作到9/30 那是因為這幾個問題都已經先預定10/1就是H-1B的開始日（也就是H-1B一般會在10/1號前批准）那如果H-1B的開始日不是10/1 那就應該是要等准批之後才能繼續工作才比較合理（也就是10/1到許可日之間不能工作）因為這本來就是H-1B的基本原則對原本沒有工作許可的人，本來就是要等到H-1B批准後才能工作為甚麼OPT就可以例外？那是因為我講的這種狀況的人太多所以才會有Cap-Gap的制度，但例外並不是無窮止境的您是這個版上熱心解答問題的版眾之一且您的答案也常常會當成參考資料如果你有這樣的認知我是覺得你在解答問題時應該要更小心如果因為你的一句話讓提問者誤判情勢的話那請問他是要找誰負責？共勉之～^^ ※ 引述《hangsh (stoney)》之銘言： : 主旨如題,對於有關爭議疑問的部份再作說明: : 資料來源網站: USCIS官方網站 : http://tinyurl.com/5dd9ox : What were the prior cap-gap regulations for F-1 students? : The prior regulations addressed the cap-gap problem by authorizing an : extension of an F-1 student’s authorized stay, but they did not extend the : student’s employment authorization. This extension was not automatic; a : notice had to be published in the Federal Register announcing the extension. : Under the prior regulations, when this Federal Register notice was published, : the student’s authorized stay was extended, but not the employment : authorization. This meant the student could remain in the United States until : October 1, when the approved H-1B employment began, but could not work until : then. : If a Federal Register notice authorizing an extension was not published, : affected students would in many cases be required to leave the United States, : apply for an H-1B visa, and seek readmission to the United States in H-1B : status. : How is the cap-gap situation changed under the interim final rule? : F-1 academic students on post-completion OPT maintain valid F-1 status until : the expiration of their OPT. Once that OPT has ended, they are authorized to : remain in the United States for up to 60 days to prepare for departure. : Under this rule, the F-1 status of students is automatically extended when : the student is the beneficiary of an H-1B petition for the next fiscal year : (with an October 1 employment start date) filed on his or her behalf during : the period in which H-1B petitions are accepted for that fiscal year. : The automatic extension terminates when USCIS rejects, denies, or revokes the : H-1B petition. : If the H-1B petition filed on behalf of the student is selected, the student : may remain in the United States and, if on post-completion OPT, continue : working until the October 1 start date indicated on the approved H-1B : petition. : The student may benefit from this provision only if he or she has not : violated his or her status. : 將舊制與修正後作個比較,答案就出來了 : 以上資料updated:04/10/2008 : 沒有必要去研判什麼保守不保守,抵觸法條等,你我都不是制定相關法規的人員 -- 我是野鴨大叔～～( ￣ c￣)y▂ξ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 67.87.233.104

→

hangsh

08/24 01:09, , 1^F

08/24 01:09, 1^F

→

hangsh

08/24 01:10, , 2^F

08/24 01:10, 2^F

→

hangsh

08/24 01:11, , 3^F

08/24 01:11, 3^F