[閒聊] 移動回合的聖水
對戰以來, 我發現大部分玩家只要被上了麻痺
拿到了聖水,在移動的時候,都會故意等對面出完牌,完全不動了
再把聖水丟出來陰對方
這...真的能算戰術嗎?
我覺得移動回合等別人不動了才出牌,真的很無言
就算是拿到聖水故意要婊人,我都不覺得這是一個好的“戰術”
但是還不少人會這樣做...是我自己認知錯誤嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.35.132.7
→
11/02 14:22, , 1F
11/02 14:22, 1F
推
11/02 14:23, , 2F
11/02 14:23, 2F
→
11/02 14:25, , 3F
11/02 14:25, 3F
→
11/02 14:25, , 4F
11/02 14:25, 4F
推
11/02 14:28, , 5F
11/02 14:28, 5F
→
11/02 14:28, , 6F
11/02 14:28, 6F
推
11/02 14:29, , 7F
11/02 14:29, 7F
→
11/02 14:30, , 8F
11/02 14:30, 8F
→
11/02 14:30, , 9F
11/02 14:30, 9F
推
11/02 14:30, , 10F
11/02 14:30, 10F
→
11/02 14:30, , 11F
11/02 14:30, 11F
→
11/02 14:30, , 12F
11/02 14:30, 12F
PVP慣性慢出牌那是一個問題,但我想針對的是聖水的使用
因為我遇到的對手並不會慢出牌
但幾乎每個都會慢出聖水,不禁讓我懷疑這是大家都可以接受的手法..
還是這真的是基本戰術? 我以後應該也應該這樣做?
※ 編輯: werttrew 來自: 114.35.132.7 (11/02 14:34)
→
11/02 14:31, , 13F
11/02 14:31, 13F
推
11/02 14:31, , 14F
11/02 14:31, 14F
→
11/02 14:32, , 15F
11/02 14:32, 15F
推
11/02 14:33, , 16F
11/02 14:33, 16F
→
11/02 14:34, , 17F
11/02 14:34, 17F
推
11/02 14:35, , 18F
11/02 14:35, 18F
→
11/02 14:35, , 19F
11/02 14:35, 19F
→
11/02 14:36, , 20F
11/02 14:36, 20F
→
11/02 14:36, , 21F
11/02 14:36, 21F
完全不一樣啊...對手有沒有麻痺,絕對會影響你的出牌吧 = ="
※ 編輯: werttrew 來自: 114.35.132.7 (11/02 14:38)
推
11/02 14:38, , 22F
11/02 14:38, 22F
→
11/02 14:39, , 23F
11/02 14:39, 23F
→
11/02 14:39, , 24F
11/02 14:39, 24F
→
11/02 14:40, , 25F
11/02 14:40, 25F
→
11/02 14:40, , 26F
11/02 14:40, 26F
→
11/02 14:40, , 27F
11/02 14:40, 27F
→
11/02 14:41, , 28F
11/02 14:41, 28F
推
11/02 14:41, , 29F
11/02 14:41, 29F
→
11/02 14:42, , 30F
11/02 14:42, 30F
不是電腦問題, 這類玩家平常也許不會慢出
但拿到聖水時就故意等你停止動作才出
→
11/02 14:42, , 31F
11/02 14:42, 31F
推
11/02 14:43, , 32F
11/02 14:43, 32F
→
11/02 14:43, , 33F
11/02 14:43, 33F
→
11/02 14:44, , 34F
11/02 14:44, 34F
→
11/02 14:44, , 35F
11/02 14:44, 35F
推
11/02 14:44, , 36F
11/02 14:44, 36F
還有 30 則推文
還有 5 段內文
→
11/02 15:58, , 67F
11/02 15:58, 67F
推
11/02 16:21, , 68F
11/02 16:21, 68F
→
11/02 17:00, , 69F
11/02 17:00, 69F
推
11/02 17:02, , 70F
11/02 17:02, 70F
推
11/02 17:11, , 71F
11/02 17:11, 71F
→
11/02 17:11, , 72F
11/02 17:11, 72F
→
11/02 17:12, , 73F
11/02 17:12, 73F
推
11/02 17:18, , 74F
11/02 17:18, 74F
推
11/02 17:26, , 75F
11/02 17:26, 75F
→
11/02 17:28, , 76F
11/02 17:28, 76F
推
11/02 17:28, , 77F
11/02 17:28, 77F
→
11/02 17:28, , 78F
11/02 17:28, 78F
→
11/02 17:28, , 79F
11/02 17:28, 79F
→
11/02 17:29, , 80F
11/02 17:29, 80F
→
11/02 17:29, , 81F
11/02 17:29, 81F
→
11/02 17:29, , 82F
11/02 17:29, 82F
→
11/02 17:30, , 83F
11/02 17:30, 83F
→
11/02 17:30, , 84F
11/02 17:30, 84F
推
11/02 17:32, , 85F
11/02 17:32, 85F
→
11/02 17:33, , 86F
11/02 17:33, 86F
→
11/02 17:33, , 87F
11/02 17:33, 87F
推
11/02 17:33, , 88F
11/02 17:33, 88F
推
11/02 17:42, , 89F
11/02 17:42, 89F
推
11/02 17:42, , 90F
11/02 17:42, 90F
推
11/02 17:56, , 91F
11/02 17:56, 91F
推
11/02 18:15, , 92F
11/02 18:15, 92F
→
11/02 18:16, , 93F
11/02 18:16, 93F
推
11/02 18:55, , 94F
11/02 18:55, 94F
→
11/02 19:00, , 95F
11/02 19:00, 95F
推
11/02 19:45, , 96F
11/02 19:45, 96F
→
11/02 19:45, , 97F
11/02 19:45, 97F
推
11/02 20:11, , 98F
11/02 20:11, 98F
推
11/02 23:23, , 99F
11/02 23:23, 99F
→
11/02 23:23, , 100F
11/02 23:23, 100F
→
11/02 23:35, , 101F
11/02 23:35, 101F
推
11/03 00:08, , 102F
11/03 00:08, 102F
→
11/03 00:08, , 103F
11/03 00:08, 103F
→
11/03 00:08, , 104F
11/03 00:08, 104F
→
11/03 00:11, , 105F
11/03 00:11, 105F
→
11/03 00:26, , 106F
11/03 00:26, 106F