[轉錄][情報] 交易Richard Jefferson 5個方案
※ [本文轉錄自 Spurs 看板 #1DtSYwyA ]
作者: parkerwind (帕克瘋~) 看板: Spurs
標題: [情報] 交易Richard Jefferson 5個方案
時間: Thu May 26 11:27:51 2011
San Antonio Spurs: 5 Trade Scenarios for Richard Jefferson
By Chris Hawkins (Spurs Featured Columnist) on May 11, 2011
外電網址: http://ppt.cc/_NRt
1.Spurs Trade: Antonio McDyess, Richard Jefferson and 2011 29th pick
Bobcats Trade: Stephen Jackson, DeSagana Diop
Why the Spurs would do it: Jackson is a player who is familiar with Gregg
Popovich and is pretty good friends with Tim Duncan. The Spurs are in
desperate need of a volatile personality to give them a swagger and toughness
that they have been missing for a few years.
Now, an aging player who has a tendency to jack up poor shots isn’t a
typical need at small forward. However, Jackson is clearly a better option
than Jefferson.
San Antonio is going to have to take on another bad contract since Jackson’s
deal at $19.3 over two years is more reasonable than Jefferson’s. This is
where Diop comes into the picture. He is owed $14.3 million over two years.
His contract may be ridiculous, however he would make for an excellent fifth
big on the Spurs’ roster.
Why would the Bobcats do it: The Bobcats are clearly in cost cutting mode
after they traded their star player, Gerald Wallace, to the Trail Blazers.
This move would present an opportunity to unload the bad contracts that they
have on their roster.
Antonio McDyess’s final year of his contract is non-guaranteed and the 29th
pick can sweeten the deal. This move will create $7.3 million in cap space
for the 2012 offseason.
1.
Spurs Trade: Antonio McDyess, Richard Jefferson and 2011 29th pick
Bobcats Trade: Stephen Jackson, DeSagana Diop
為什麼馬刺隊會這麼做：傑克遜是個熟悉波波維奇的球員，而且和鄧肯是好朋友。馬刺隊
迫切需要一種不安定的個性，給予他們活力和韌性，他們缺少這東西已經幾年了。
現在，對於一個小前鋒來說，一個老化且只能投籃的球員已經不太需要了。不過，傑克遜
顯然是一個比RJ更好的選擇。
馬刺將得簽下另一個爛約(2年1930萬)，但還是比RJ的合理多了。因此Diop也必須拿來平
衡新資。他未來還有2年1430萬，他的合同可能很荒謬，但他在馬刺擔任第五位禁區球員
還是不錯。
為什麼山貓會這麼做：山貓隊顯然利用交易來消減成本，他們的明星球員G蛙被換到拓荒
者。此舉將提供一個機會來卸載垃圾合同。
麥克代斯的最後一年他合同是無擔保的，還有附贈第29順位選秀權。此舉將在2012休賽季
創造730萬美元的薪資空間。
我聽說待過馬刺的球員都對這隻球隊很有感情，但S.Jackson好像是拍拍屁股就走了~
怎麼會跟老大有交情呢?
2.Spurs Trade: Richard Jefferson, Antonio McDyess, DeJuan Blair
Jazz Trade: Al Jefferson
Why would the Spurs do it: There used to be a time when the Spurs could just
dump the ball down low to Duncan, and it would be a guaranteed two points or
a foul. Now, Duncan has reached the point in his career where he can no
longer carry the offense by himself.
Al Jefferson is one of the best low-post scorers in the game. His acquisition
would allow Duncan to focus more on anchoring the defense. Even at Duncan’s
advanced age, he still has the ability to anchor the paint and block shots at
the rim because he smart and knows where to be.
Now there are some concerns. Jefferson’s feet are even slower than Duncan’
s. This frontcourt tandem would get annihilated on pick-and-rolls. His
conditioning also raises some red-flags. However, if San Antonio is trying to
squeeze two more years out of its nucleus, they have to take some chances.
Why would the Jazz do it: It has not worked out between Al Jefferson and the
Utah Jazz. The idea was that Jefferson could come in and replace the
production of Carlos Boozer, but he has been unable to this season.
This team has a current logjam in the frontcourt with Derrick Favors, Mehmet
Okur and Paul Millsap. Al Jefferson might be their most movable piece.
2.
Spurs Trade: Richard Jefferson, Antonio McDyess, DeJuan Blair
Jazz Trade: Al Jefferson
馬刺隊為什麼會這麼做：曾經，馬刺隊可以把球塞給低位的鄧肯，然後就是保證得2分不
然就造成犯規。現在，鄧肯已經沒辦法再憑一己之力進攻了。
A.Jefferson在比賽中是最好的低位得分手之一。獲得他將讓鄧肯有更多的心力專注在防
守。即使鄧肯已經老了，但他仍然有能力防守禁區，擋下籃下的投籃，因為他很聰明，知
道該怎麼做。
現在有一些顧慮。AJ的腳步是比鄧肯還慢的。這樣前場會被pick&roll玩死。他的健康也
是有疑慮的。但是如果馬刺還想保持競爭力2年以上，他們不得不採用一些機會。
爵士隊為什麼會這麼做：AJ和爵士隊不搭。當時的爵士的想法是AJ可以取代Boozer，但他
在本賽季未能做到。
這支球隊的前場大塞車，目前有Derrick Favors，Okur和Millsap。AJ也許是他們最可移
動的一塊。
3.Spurs trade: Richard Jefferson, Antonio McDyess, DeJuan Blair, 2011 29th
pick
Clippers trade: Chris Kaman and Ryan Gomes
Why the Spurs would do it: The Spurs are desperate for another competent
frontcourt mate for Duncan. Kaman is a pretty good target to pursue in this
regard because he is a big and very skilled low-post scorer. Kaman is only 29
years old, which is a good age for a big-man.
Why would the Clippers do it: There is an obvious need at small-forward for
Los Angeles. Al-Farouq Aminu plays more like a power forward. Jefferson would
also give the Clippers more shooting on the perimeter.
Kaman has been injury prone and has been inconsistent his whole career. With
the emergence of DeAndre Jordan, Los Angeles could look to deal Kaman to save
some money to re-sign him. With McDyess’s contract, Los Angeles could save
up to $3 million if they decline his option.
DeJuan Blair is another young player who the Clippers might take a look at
due to the fact that he is young and still has a cheap contract.
3.
Spurs trade: Richard Jefferson, Antonio McDyess, DeJuan Blair, 2011 29th pick
Clippers trade: Chris Kaman and Ryan Gomes
為什麼馬刺隊會這麼做：馬刺很渴望替鄧肯找個可組成雙塔的隊友。Kaman是一個不錯的
目標，因為他是有非常純熟低位得分能力的大個子。而且Kama只有29歲，對大個子來說
是當打之年。
為什麼快艇會這麼做：快艇很明顯需要小前鋒。Aminu打的比較像個大前鋒。RJ也將可提
供快艇隊外線投籃。
Kaman很容易受傷，已不符他的整個職業生涯。隨著D.Jordan的崛起，快艇希望可以重簽
Kaman的合約省錢。而快艇隊可以節省300萬美元，如果他們拒絕馬岱合約的選擇。
Blair是另一個快艇可能有興趣的年輕球員，他很年輕，也有一個便宜的合同。
4.Spurs trade: Richard Jefferson, Antonio McDyess and 2011 first-round pick.
Kings trade: Omri Casspi and Francisco Garcia
Why the Spurs would do it: Casspi is a good young asset to have. This would
also create financial flexibility for a future trade.
Why the Kings would do it: Sacramento is going to have the most cap space
this summer, and it is highly likely that they strike out in free agency.
With a gaping hole at SF, they may get desperate. Jefferson is at least a
name to sell to their fans, and he'd be an upgrade on what they currently
have.
He'd also add a professional, veteran example for their immature young
players, as well as upgrade their three-point shooting. Casspi has fallen out
of favor and wants out. Garcia would just be a throw- in to unload his
contract.
4.
Spurs trade: Richard Jefferson, Antonio McDyess and 2011 first-round pick.
Kings trade: Omri Casspi and Francisco Garcia
為什麼馬刺隊會這麼做：擁有年輕的Casspi是一個很好的資產。這也造就未來交易財務上
的靈活性。
為什麼國王會這麼做：國王在今年夏天有最充裕的薪金空間，他們極有可能剔除自由球員
。他們可能會不顧一切填補小前鋒的缺口。RJ至少有名氣可以賣給他們的球迷，他也會打
的比現在好。
RJ也可以做為一個專業、經驗豐富的榜樣，給他們的年輕球員，以及提升他們的三分球命
中率。Casspi已經失寵，並希望出走。Garcia一併送出將是另一個合同卸載。
5.Spurs trade: Richard Jefferson
Nets trade: Travis Outlaw and Johan Petro
Why would the Spurs do it: I doubt that the Spurs front office will be
thrilled at the prospect of trading for a player like Outlaw. However, they
are going to be desperate to unload Jefferson’s contract. In order to do
that, they are also going to have to take on Petro’s two-year $6.8 million
contract.
At this point, even Outlaw appears to be a better option for the Spurs than
Jefferson. Although he takes tons of bad shots, he is long, athletic and
would make for a terrific small-ball power forward. Petro would obviously be
a throw in, but he would also make for a valuable fifth big man.
Why the Nets would do it: Outlaw has been atrocious for the Nets this season,
and they still owe him $28 million over the next four years. Jefferson is a
known commodity around New Jersey. In fact, he has had the best years of
career with that organization.
This move will provide the Nets with a chance to unload two bad contracts
while acquiring a name that they can sell to the fans.
5.
Spurs trade: Richard Jefferson
Nets trade: Travis Outlaw and Johan Petro
馬刺隊為什麼會這麼做：我懷疑馬刺前廳部如果得到了像Outlaw這種球員會很高興，。然
而，他們更可望擺脫RJ的合同。為了做到這一點，他們也將不得不接下Petro兩年680萬美
元的合同。
在這一點上，Outlaw似乎是比RJ更適合馬刺。雖然他有過很多不好的出手，但他很修長，
體能條件好，小球戰術中擔任大前鋒也會表現得很好。Petro顯然不是重點，但他擔任馬
刺的第五位大個子綽綽有餘。
籃網隊為什麼會這麼做：Outlaw本賽季被籃網殘酷對待，他們還欠他2800萬美元在未來四
年。RJ在紐澤西可是家喻戶曉的。事實上，他的職業生涯最佳表現就是在這裡。
此舉將提供籃網隊一個機會卸下兩個垃圾合同，同時獲得一個可以賣給球迷們的名字，RJ。
我也覺得RJ是屬於籃網隊的...........
--
◢███◣
█◥◥◥
我們不是搖擺不定 ◢● ●
我們只是還在找尋平衡點 ╭╮ ◣ ▽ ◢
╯╰︵◣天秤 ◢
ＬＩＢＲＡ ψQSWEET ￣￣ ▂▂ Libra <天秤版>
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.113.121.101
※ 編輯: parkerwind 來自: 140.113.121.101 (05/26 11:28)
推
05/26 11:37,
05/26 11:37
推
05/26 11:38,
05/26 11:38
推
05/26 11:38,
05/26 11:38
→
05/26 11:39,
05/26 11:39
→
05/26 11:41,
05/26 11:41
→
05/26 11:42,
05/26 11:42
→
05/26 11:43,
05/26 11:43
→
05/26 11:43,
05/26 11:43
→
05/26 11:44,
05/26 11:44
推
05/26 11:45,
05/26 11:45
→
05/26 11:45,
05/26 11:45
→
05/26 11:47,
05/26 11:47
→
05/26 11:47,
05/26 11:47
→
05/26 11:49,
05/26 11:49
推
05/26 11:49,
05/26 11:49
其實這篇是我google: trade Richard Jefferson 找到的新聞中唯一可以翻的
為什麼是唯一可以翻的? 因為大部分的都是說RJ有很大的可能會在馬刺待到合約結束
這點你知 我知 但真難以接受XD 以RJ這兩年的表現要有可行的交易真的很難
就像海德里斯說的那樣 我也覺得只有5比較有可能 但換了好像也沒比較好
1~4 換成的話真的是做夢都會笑了XD 目前看來馬刺比較有可能乖乖把RJ的約吃完了
不然的話要加上Hill或Neal配套交易還蠻可惜的
真是猜不透制服組啊~ 去年RJ表現那麼差 還跟他續約那麼多年幹嘛啊 = =
※ 編輯: parkerwind 來自: 140.113.121.101 (05/26 12:06)
推
05/26 11:52,
05/26 11:52
推
05/26 11:53,
05/26 11:53
→
05/26 11:53,
05/26 11:53
→
05/26 11:54,
05/26 11:54
→
05/26 11:54,
05/26 11:54
→
05/26 11:56,
05/26 11:56
推
05/26 11:58,
05/26 11:58
→
05/26 11:58,
05/26 11:58
推
05/26 12:00,
05/26 12:00
推
05/26 12:00,
05/26 12:00
→
05/26 12:01,
05/26 12:01
推
05/26 12:03,
05/26 12:03
→
05/26 12:03,
05/26 12:03
推
05/26 12:04,
05/26 12:04
推
05/26 12:05,
05/26 12:05
推
05/26 12:05,
05/26 12:05
推
05/26 12:09,
05/26 12:09
→
05/26 12:09,
05/26 12:09
推
05/26 12:10,
05/26 12:10
推
05/26 12:15,
05/26 12:15
推
05/26 12:18,
05/26 12:18
→
05/26 12:19,
05/26 12:19
→
05/26 12:33,
05/26 12:33
還有 104 則推文
還有 1 段內文
推
05/27 10:07, , 91F
05/27 10:07, 91F
推
05/27 10:17, , 92F
05/27 10:17, 92F
噓
05/27 10:41, , 93F
05/27 10:41, 93F
→
05/27 10:41, , 94F
05/27 10:41, 94F
→
05/27 10:45, , 95F
05/27 10:45, 95F
推
05/27 10:46, , 96F
05/27 10:46, 96F
→
05/27 10:54, , 97F
05/27 10:54, 97F
→
05/27 10:58, , 98F
05/27 10:58, 98F
噓
05/27 11:10, , 99F
05/27 11:10, 99F
噓
05/27 11:10, , 100F
05/27 11:10, 100F
→
05/27 11:13, , 101F
05/27 11:13, 101F
噓
05/27 11:14, , 102F
05/27 11:14, 102F
→
05/27 11:14, , 103F
05/27 11:14, 103F
噓
05/27 11:15, , 104F
05/27 11:15, 104F
噓
05/27 11:16, , 105F
05/27 11:16, 105F
噓
05/27 11:17, , 106F
05/27 11:17, 106F
噓
05/27 11:17, , 107F
05/27 11:17, 107F
噓
05/27 11:17, , 108F
05/27 11:17, 108F
噓
05/27 11:18, , 109F
05/27 11:18, 109F
噓
05/27 11:18, , 110F
05/27 11:18, 110F
噓
05/27 11:22, , 111F
05/27 11:22, 111F
→
05/27 11:22, , 112F
05/27 11:22, 112F
噓
05/27 11:22, , 113F
05/27 11:22, 113F
噓
05/27 11:25, , 114F
05/27 11:25, 114F
噓
05/27 11:25, , 115F
05/27 11:25, 115F
噓
05/27 11:29, , 116F
05/27 11:29, 116F
→
05/27 11:32, , 117F
05/27 11:32, 117F
→
05/27 11:32, , 118F
05/27 11:32, 118F
→
05/27 11:44, , 119F
05/27 11:44, 119F
→
05/27 11:44, , 120F
05/27 11:44, 120F
噓
05/27 11:54, , 121F
05/27 11:54, 121F
噓
05/27 12:43, , 122F
05/27 12:43, 122F
噓
05/27 12:54, , 123F
05/27 12:54, 123F
噓
05/27 13:09, , 124F
05/27 13:09, 124F
噓
05/27 13:29, , 125F
05/27 13:29, 125F
噓
05/27 13:45, , 126F
05/27 13:45, 126F
噓
05/27 13:46, , 127F
05/27 13:46, 127F
→
05/27 20:46, , 128F
05/27 20:46, 128F
推
05/30 07:20, , 129F
05/30 07:20, 129F
噓
05/30 21:19, , 130F
05/30 21:19, 130F