Re: [爆料] 衛視的球評
我剛剛也有看這場比賽,我也覺得李雲翔不會講戰術或配合而都是講一些我們球迷自己看
或從文字資料就可以知道的東西,那球評的意義何在
其實翻開台灣體育轉播都覺得沒啥價值:鮮少球評會講技術性的層級的東西,從最常
看的棒籃都是如此,例如說棒球投手如何揮臂等一系列完整講解議後打者抬腿打擊球等
擊球等細部說明,例如說均速有90MPH加上犀利的指叉球的野茂不好打,但從沒人講解說
指叉球進到本壘是如何難打
籃球部分我除了高景炎堪稱球評以外,其他的都只能算是主播吧!
說現在的爵士隊不如過去二老組成的爵士隊我倒有點不認同,現在的爵士隊在天份
及體格部分都比過去二老的強壯許多,過去二老除了老馬以外,其他人都還是偏瘦弱
--
滅絕師太:殷堂主,你要考較我掌力這就請過來
殷野王拱手道:今日深感師太高義,不敢再行得罪,咱們後會有期
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 122.120.194.45
推
10/09 23:19, , 1F
10/09 23:19, 1F
推
10/09 23:27, , 2F
10/09 23:27, 2F
推
10/09 23:58, , 3F
10/09 23:58, 3F
推
10/10 00:09, , 4F
10/10 00:09, 4F
推
10/10 00:27, , 5F
10/10 00:27, 5F
推
10/10 00:29, , 6F
10/10 00:29, 6F
→
10/10 01:35, , 7F
10/10 01:35, 7F
→
10/10 01:35, , 8F
10/10 01:35, 8F
推
10/10 02:37, , 9F
10/10 02:37, 9F
推
10/10 02:51, , 10F
10/10 02:51, 10F
→
10/10 02:51, , 11F
10/10 02:51, 11F
推
10/10 06:50, , 12F
10/10 06:50, 12F
→
10/10 06:51, , 13F
10/10 06:51, 13F
→
10/10 06:53, , 14F
10/10 06:53, 14F
→
10/10 06:54, , 15F
10/10 06:54, 15F
推
10/10 07:53, , 16F
10/10 07:53, 16F
推
10/10 20:54, , 17F
10/10 20:54, 17F
噓
10/11 15:01, , 18F
10/11 15:01, 18F
噓
10/11 15:02, , 19F
10/11 15:02, 19F
噓
10/11 15:02, , 20F
10/11 15:02, 20F
噓
10/11 15:03, , 21F
10/11 15:03, 21F
噓
10/11 15:05, , 22F
10/11 15:05, 22F
噓
10/11 15:05, , 23F
10/11 15:05, 23F
噓
10/11 15:13, , 24F
10/11 15:13, 24F
噓
10/11 15:13, , 25F
10/11 15:13, 25F
噓
10/11 15:42, , 26F
10/11 15:42, 26F
噓
10/11 15:42, , 27F
10/11 15:42, 27F
噓
10/11 15:44, , 28F
10/11 15:44, 28F
噓
10/11 15:44, , 29F
10/11 15:44, 29F
噓
10/11 16:41, , 30F
10/11 16:41, 30F
噓
10/11 16:42, , 31F
10/11 16:42, 31F
噓
10/11 16:48, , 32F
10/11 16:48, 32F
噓
10/11 16:48, , 33F
10/11 16:48, 33F
噓
10/11 16:52, , 34F
10/11 16:52, 34F
噓
10/11 16:52, , 35F
10/11 16:52, 35F
噓
10/11 17:10, , 36F
10/11 17:10, 36F
噓
10/11 21:11, , 37F
10/11 21:11, 37F
噓
10/11 21:13, , 38F
10/11 21:13, 38F
→
09/11 07:42, , 39F
09/11 07:42, 39F
討論串 (同標題文章)