Re: [抽卡] 超幹!!!!算不清幾抽了
原PO何必講這麼武斷?
敝人文章 #1IWi_WW1 (ToS)
[地獄] 火遊波比之0石奧汀通關-我就是沒有波比
http://ppt.cc/AsHI 有三太子沒阿基,人馬EX超無壓力通關
http://ppt.cc/sNF0 遮住了,隊伍跟上面一樣,我用這隊起碼過了10次輪回
舉了三個例子給你。
當不用強求爆到三四百萬以上的高傷害的時候
或是沒有撞上水屬怪的時候
或是根本就是木屬性關卡的時候
阿基師的爛血量會比三太子的平均高三圍好用? 很難說吧?
需要連續爆發的關卡,多放一隻三太子或火狗也許也比較有利啊?
每個人有每個人不同的玩法,講這麼絕對是要作什麼 = =?
打王時開阿基一波打一兩千萬跟不開阿基師打兩三百萬是有差到哪邊...
我不否認阿基師開下去超威 可是也就只有那個ROUND
反而還要占掉一個隊伍空間
如果不用開阿基師就能秒王,那當然放三太子也OK啊 HP實在差太多
如果王是水屬怪 那放阿基師當然有其優越性啊
說到底還是看關卡特性,為什麼不能不放阿基師?
火隊人才這麼多,誰能說哪種隊伍組成就是完美火隊?
真的要論,你要打超級一波流挑戰火隊最高傷害還是可能要靠三太子啊
火希隊長 隊員 三太子 六星火主 火巫 阿基師 不錯吧?
當然原PO可能不同意我的意見
但我想要表達的事情只有世事無絕對
以上,瑪奇被盜了,準備報案 崩潰中
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.27.179.16
→
11/29 01:09, , 1F
11/29 01:09, 1F
推
11/29 01:10, , 2F
11/29 01:10, 2F
→
11/29 01:11, , 3F
11/29 01:11, 3F
→
11/29 01:11, , 4F
11/29 01:11, 4F
推
11/29 01:12, , 5F
11/29 01:12, 5F
推
11/29 01:12, , 6F
11/29 01:12, 6F
推
11/29 01:12, , 7F
11/29 01:12, 7F
推
11/29 01:13, , 8F
11/29 01:13, 8F
→
11/29 01:13, , 9F
11/29 01:13, 9F
→
11/29 01:13, , 10F
11/29 01:13, 10F
推
11/29 01:13, , 11F
11/29 01:13, 11F
→
11/29 01:14, , 12F
11/29 01:14, 12F
→
11/29 01:14, , 13F
11/29 01:14, 13F
推
11/29 01:15, , 14F
11/29 01:15, 14F
→
11/29 01:15, , 15F
11/29 01:15, 15F
→
11/29 01:16, , 16F
11/29 01:16, 16F
→
11/29 01:17, , 17F
11/29 01:17, 17F
→
11/29 01:17, , 18F
11/29 01:17, 18F
→
11/29 01:18, , 19F
11/29 01:18, 19F
推
11/29 01:18, , 20F
11/29 01:18, 20F
→
11/29 01:19, , 21F
11/29 01:19, 21F
→
11/29 01:19, , 22F
11/29 01:19, 22F
→
11/29 01:19, , 23F
11/29 01:19, 23F
→
11/29 01:19, , 24F
11/29 01:19, 24F
→
11/29 01:20, , 25F
11/29 01:20, 25F
→
11/29 01:21, , 26F
11/29 01:21, 26F
→
11/29 01:22, , 27F
11/29 01:22, 27F
→
11/29 01:22, , 28F
11/29 01:22, 28F
→
11/29 01:22, , 29F
11/29 01:22, 29F
→
11/29 01:22, , 30F
11/29 01:22, 30F
→
11/29 01:22, , 31F
11/29 01:22, 31F
※ 編輯: f7504261 來自: 114.27.179.16 (11/29 01:23)
→
11/29 01:23, , 32F
11/29 01:23, 32F
推
11/29 01:23, , 33F
11/29 01:23, 33F
推
11/29 01:24, , 34F
11/29 01:24, 34F
→
11/29 01:24, , 35F
11/29 01:24, 35F
→
11/29 01:24, , 36F
11/29 01:24, 36F
→
11/29 01:25, , 37F
11/29 01:25, 37F
→
11/29 01:25, , 38F
11/29 01:25, 38F
→
11/29 01:26, , 39F
11/29 01:26, 39F
→
11/29 01:26, , 40F
11/29 01:26, 40F
→
11/29 01:27, , 41F
11/29 01:27, 41F
→
11/29 01:27, , 42F
11/29 01:27, 42F
→
11/29 01:27, , 43F
11/29 01:27, 43F
→
11/29 01:28, , 44F
11/29 01:28, 44F
→
11/29 01:29, , 45F
11/29 01:29, 45F
推
11/29 01:29, , 46F
11/29 01:29, 46F
→
11/29 01:30, , 47F
11/29 01:30, 47F
→
11/29 01:30, , 48F
11/29 01:30, 48F
→
11/29 01:30, , 49F
11/29 01:30, 49F
→
11/29 01:31, , 50F
11/29 01:31, 50F
→
11/29 01:31, , 51F
11/29 01:31, 51F
→
11/29 01:32, , 52F
11/29 01:32, 52F
→
11/29 01:33, , 53F
11/29 01:33, 53F
→
11/29 01:33, , 54F
11/29 01:33, 54F
→
11/29 01:35, , 55F
11/29 01:35, 55F
→
11/29 01:36, , 56F
11/29 01:36, 56F
推
11/29 01:39, , 57F
11/29 01:39, 57F
推
11/29 01:40, , 58F
11/29 01:40, 58F
推
11/29 01:40, , 59F
11/29 01:40, 59F
→
11/29 01:43, , 60F
11/29 01:43, 60F
噓
11/29 01:51, , 61F
11/29 01:51, 61F
推
11/29 02:27, , 62F
11/29 02:27, 62F
推
11/29 02:37, , 63F
11/29 02:37, 63F
推
11/29 02:41, , 64F
11/29 02:41, 64F
推
11/29 02:42, , 65F
11/29 02:42, 65F
推
11/29 02:50, , 66F
11/29 02:50, 66F
→
11/29 02:50, , 67F
11/29 02:50, 67F
→
11/29 02:54, , 68F
11/29 02:54, 68F
推
11/29 03:08, , 69F
11/29 03:08, 69F
→
11/29 03:13, , 70F
11/29 03:13, 70F
→
11/29 03:14, , 71F
11/29 03:14, 71F
推
11/29 03:15, , 72F
11/29 03:15, 72F
→
11/29 03:15, , 73F
11/29 03:15, 73F
→
11/29 03:16, , 74F
11/29 03:16, 74F
→
11/29 03:16, , 75F
11/29 03:16, 75F
→
11/29 03:19, , 76F
11/29 03:19, 76F
推
11/29 03:27, , 77F
11/29 03:27, 77F
推
11/29 07:46, , 78F
11/29 07:46, 78F
推
11/29 07:49, , 79F
11/29 07:49, 79F
推
11/29 09:22, , 80F
11/29 09:22, 80F
推
11/29 09:42, , 81F
11/29 09:42, 81F
推
11/29 10:42, , 82F
11/29 10:42, 82F
→
11/29 10:42, , 83F
11/29 10:42, 83F
推
11/29 10:56, , 84F
11/29 10:56, 84F
推
11/29 11:08, , 85F
11/29 11:08, 85F
推
11/29 11:27, , 86F
11/29 11:27, 86F
推
11/29 12:08, , 87F
11/29 12:08, 87F
推
11/29 12:47, , 88F
11/29 12:47, 88F
推
11/29 14:56, , 89F
11/29 14:56, 89F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):