Re: 大家對於費德勒拿冠軍的想法
要說含金量,那我來說說我的看法吧。
的確有滿多人說Federer這次法網沒有打敗Nadal;或者是說,Nadal提前出
局(膝傷?),拿到冠軍似乎有點美中不足。
可是我們來看一下法網的數據和紀錄:(開放年代以降)
連續四年打進法網決賽的只有四位:
Borg (1978-1981)
Lendl (1984-1987)
Nadal (2005-2008)
Federer (2006-2009)
連續五年打進法網四強的,就只有一位。
Federer (2005-2009)
雖然你可以說沒拿冠軍,這些數據一點意義也沒有,不過能那麼多年持續不
斷衝擊法網冠軍的,也只剩他了。沒錯,Federer或許在紅土上擊敗不了好狀
態的Nadal,不過那又如何?競賽本來就是自己要維持住狀態,傷病、狀態也
是比賽的一環,絕對不可能說無關。
Federer在09年法網奪冠了,只是證明Federer今年有資格拿到冠軍,Nadal很
可惜無法競爭而已。也同時正名了Federer絕對不是法網的無冕王,奪冠前,
說是Federer獨缺法網,那法網是不是也獨缺Federer?看到全場觀眾加持就知
道了,這麼多年都走到獎盃面前了,祇不過是有人更神勇而已,而今天那人不
再神勇,就要說冠軍含金量不足,那Federer08年初也有生重病,難不成要說
當時所有拿下冠軍的選手全都含金量不足嗎?是不是也要客觀地、公平的看待
所有的選手呢?
其實Federer最偉大的成就,不是別的,就是長時間保持在絕佳狀態,這從很
多方面都可以看的出來,像是大滿貫連續決賽、四強紀錄、一堆連勝紀錄、球
王連續週數紀錄、最短時間取得大量大滿貫冠軍紀錄等等…這些都是前無古人
,來者也很難突破的障礙。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.218.94
推
06/10 02:24, , 1F
06/10 02:24, 1F
推
06/10 02:25, , 2F
06/10 02:25, 2F
推
06/10 02:26, , 3F
06/10 02:26, 3F
推
06/10 02:26, , 4F
06/10 02:26, 4F
推
06/10 02:27, , 5F
06/10 02:27, 5F
→
06/10 02:27, , 6F
06/10 02:27, 6F
推
06/10 02:29, , 7F
06/10 02:29, 7F
推
06/10 02:30, , 8F
06/10 02:30, 8F
推
06/10 02:44, , 9F
06/10 02:44, 9F
推
06/10 02:45, , 10F
06/10 02:45, 10F
推
06/10 02:48, , 11F
06/10 02:48, 11F
推
06/10 02:51, , 12F
06/10 02:51, 12F
推
06/10 02:53, , 13F
06/10 02:53, 13F
→
06/10 02:54, , 14F
06/10 02:54, 14F
→
06/10 02:54, , 15F
06/10 02:54, 15F
推
06/10 02:57, , 16F
06/10 02:57, 16F
→
06/10 02:58, , 17F
06/10 02:58, 17F
→
06/10 03:00, , 18F
06/10 03:00, 18F
→
06/10 03:00, , 19F
06/10 03:00, 19F
→
06/10 03:01, , 20F
06/10 03:01, 20F
推
06/10 03:01, , 21F
06/10 03:01, 21F
推
06/10 03:02, , 22F
06/10 03:02, 22F
→
06/10 03:02, , 23F
06/10 03:02, 23F
推
06/10 03:02, , 24F
06/10 03:02, 24F
→
06/10 03:03, , 25F
06/10 03:03, 25F
→
06/10 03:03, , 26F
06/10 03:03, 26F
推
06/10 03:04, , 27F
06/10 03:04, 27F
推
06/10 03:04, , 28F
06/10 03:04, 28F
推
06/10 03:19, , 29F
06/10 03:19, 29F
→
06/10 03:20, , 30F
06/10 03:20, 30F
推
06/10 03:37, , 31F
06/10 03:37, 31F
推
06/10 05:22, , 32F
06/10 05:22, 32F
→
06/10 06:31, , 33F
06/10 06:31, 33F
→
06/10 06:36, , 34F
06/10 06:36, 34F
推
06/10 06:39, , 35F
06/10 06:39, 35F
推
06/10 06:42, , 36F
06/10 06:42, 36F
推
06/10 06:48, , 37F
06/10 06:48, 37F
推
06/10 08:14, , 38F
06/10 08:14, 38F
推
06/10 08:39, , 39F
06/10 08:39, 39F
還有 229 則推文
→
06/10 21:18, , 269F
06/10 21:18, 269F
推
06/10 21:36, , 270F
06/10 21:36, 270F
推
06/10 22:03, , 271F
06/10 22:03, 271F
→
06/10 22:04, , 272F
06/10 22:04, 272F
→
06/10 22:05, , 273F
06/10 22:05, 273F
→
06/10 22:06, , 274F
06/10 22:06, 274F
推
06/10 22:14, , 275F
06/10 22:14, 275F
推
06/10 22:43, , 276F
06/10 22:43, 276F
推
06/10 22:50, , 277F
06/10 22:50, 277F
推
06/10 22:55, , 278F
06/10 22:55, 278F
推
06/10 23:21, , 279F
06/10 23:21, 279F
推
06/11 00:18, , 280F
06/11 00:18, 280F
推
06/11 01:50, , 281F
06/11 01:50, 281F
→
06/11 01:51, , 282F
06/11 01:51, 282F
推
06/11 02:04, , 283F
06/11 02:04, 283F
推
06/11 02:25, , 284F
06/11 02:25, 284F
推
06/11 02:29, , 285F
06/11 02:29, 285F
→
06/11 08:01, , 286F
06/11 08:01, 286F
推
06/11 08:40, , 287F
06/11 08:40, 287F
推
06/11 08:45, , 288F
06/11 08:45, 288F
→
06/11 08:46, , 289F
06/11 08:46, 289F
推
06/11 11:16, , 290F
06/11 11:16, 290F
→
06/11 11:17, , 291F
06/11 11:17, 291F
推
06/11 11:35, , 292F
06/11 11:35, 292F
推
06/11 15:00, , 293F
06/11 15:00, 293F
推
06/11 15:58, , 294F
06/11 15:58, 294F
→
06/11 15:59, , 295F
06/11 15:59, 295F
推
06/11 16:45, , 296F
06/11 16:45, 296F
→
06/11 16:45, , 297F
06/11 16:45, 297F
→
06/11 16:46, , 298F
06/11 16:46, 298F
→
06/11 16:47, , 299F
06/11 16:47, 299F
推
06/11 16:50, , 300F
06/11 16:50, 300F
推
06/11 16:55, , 301F
06/11 16:55, 301F
推
06/11 16:56, , 302F
06/11 16:56, 302F
推
06/12 00:56, , 303F
06/12 00:56, 303F
→
06/12 00:57, , 304F
06/12 00:57, 304F
→
06/12 00:59, , 305F
06/12 00:59, 305F
→
06/12 00:59, , 306F
06/12 00:59, 306F
→
06/12 01:00, , 307F
06/12 01:00, 307F
推
06/15 13:47, , 308F
06/15 13:47, 308F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 4 篇):