[討論] 外勞來台灣到底好事還壞事??
如題
我最近在想這個問題
其實台灣能吸引6~70萬外勞 是否表示台灣產業還算蠻健全的呢?
因為這代表台灣至少有夠多的職缺才能夠填滿這6~70萬外來人口
而且 一個外國人來台灣之後
一定會衍生出食衣住行方面的需求
這等於是變相幫台灣人創造新的消費行為和新的相關職缺
中壢火車站附近就非常多啊
有一種專們接送外勞去玩的新工作型態就被創造出來了!
附近也有很多開給外勞娛樂消費用的商店 等等
撇開一些民粹上的想法
其實只要能引進一個外來人口 對於台灣本身來說是否一定是Z>B呢?
概念就像 南部人北上求職
總的來說 對北部人一定是賺的
因為南部人需要租屋 和消費 都會幫忙北部刺激經濟和消費
這個問題大家能否討論一下? 我自己是覺得還有趣的
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.115.30.19
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Tech_Job/M.1488354246.A.F12.html
※ 編輯: peter308 (140.115.30.19), 03/01/2017 15:45:41
※ 編輯: peter308 (140.115.30.19), 03/01/2017 15:46:55
→
03/01 15:49, , 1F
03/01 15:49, 1F
※ 編輯: peter308 (140.115.30.19), 03/01/2017 15:51:14
推
03/01 15:58, , 2F
03/01 15:58, 2F
→
03/01 15:58, , 3F
03/01 15:58, 3F
→
03/01 15:58, , 4F
03/01 15:58, 4F
推
03/01 16:09, , 5F
03/01 16:09, 5F
→
03/01 16:10, , 6F
03/01 16:10, 6F
→
03/01 16:11, , 7F
03/01 16:11, 7F
→
03/01 16:15, , 8F
03/01 16:15, 8F
→
03/01 16:15, , 9F
03/01 16:15, 9F
推
03/01 16:37, , 10F
03/01 16:37, 10F
推
03/01 16:42, , 11F
03/01 16:42, 11F
→
03/01 16:43, , 12F
03/01 16:43, 12F
→
03/01 17:04, , 13F
03/01 17:04, 13F
推
03/01 17:12, , 14F
03/01 17:12, 14F
→
03/01 17:12, , 15F
03/01 17:12, 15F
推
03/01 17:18, , 16F
03/01 17:18, 16F
→
03/01 17:20, , 17F
03/01 17:20, 17F
推
03/01 17:26, , 18F
03/01 17:26, 18F
推
03/01 17:47, , 19F
03/01 17:47, 19F
→
03/01 18:08, , 20F
03/01 18:08, 20F
→
03/01 18:11, , 21F
03/01 18:11, 21F
→
03/01 18:12, , 22F
03/01 18:12, 22F
推
03/01 18:25, , 23F
03/01 18:25, 23F
推
03/01 18:53, , 24F
03/01 18:53, 24F
推
03/01 19:45, , 25F
03/01 19:45, 25F
→
03/01 19:45, , 26F
03/01 19:45, 26F
推
03/01 20:44, , 27F
03/01 20:44, 27F
推
03/01 20:56, , 28F
03/01 20:56, 28F
→
03/01 20:56, , 29F
03/01 20:56, 29F
→
03/01 20:56, , 30F
03/01 20:56, 30F
推
03/01 21:41, , 31F
03/01 21:41, 31F
→
03/01 21:41, , 32F
03/01 21:41, 32F
噓
03/01 21:43, , 33F
03/01 21:43, 33F
推
03/01 21:46, , 34F
03/01 21:46, 34F
→
03/01 21:46, , 35F
03/01 21:46, 35F
→
03/01 21:46, , 36F
03/01 21:46, 36F
→
03/01 21:46, , 37F
03/01 21:46, 37F
→
03/01 21:46, , 38F
03/01 21:46, 38F
還有 28 則推文
→
03/02 06:59, , 67F
03/02 06:59, 67F
→
03/02 07:00, , 68F
03/02 07:00, 68F
→
03/02 07:02, , 69F
03/02 07:02, 69F
→
03/02 07:03, , 70F
03/02 07:03, 70F
→
03/02 07:04, , 71F
03/02 07:04, 71F
→
03/02 07:06, , 72F
03/02 07:06, 72F
→
03/02 07:07, , 73F
03/02 07:07, 73F
→
03/02 07:20, , 74F
03/02 07:20, 74F
→
03/02 07:21, , 75F
03/02 07:21, 75F
→
03/02 07:22, , 76F
03/02 07:22, 76F
→
03/02 07:24, , 77F
03/02 07:24, 77F
推
03/02 07:25, , 78F
03/02 07:25, 78F
推
03/02 08:19, , 79F
03/02 08:19, 79F
推
03/02 09:11, , 80F
03/02 09:11, 80F
→
03/02 09:11, , 81F
03/02 09:11, 81F
推
03/02 09:14, , 82F
03/02 09:14, 82F
→
03/02 09:14, , 83F
03/02 09:14, 83F
→
03/02 09:45, , 84F
03/02 09:45, 84F
推
03/02 12:25, , 85F
03/02 12:25, 85F
推
03/02 12:48, , 86F
03/02 12:48, 86F
推
03/02 12:48, , 87F
03/02 12:48, 87F
推
03/02 12:52, , 88F
03/02 12:52, 88F
推
03/02 12:52, , 89F
03/02 12:52, 89F
推
03/02 12:53, , 90F
03/02 12:53, 90F
推
03/02 12:53, , 91F
03/02 12:53, 91F
推
03/02 12:54, , 92F
03/02 12:54, 92F
推
03/02 14:01, , 93F
03/02 14:01, 93F
→
03/02 14:01, , 94F
03/02 14:01, 94F
→
03/02 14:02, , 95F
03/02 14:02, 95F
→
03/02 14:02, , 96F
03/02 14:02, 96F
→
03/02 20:19, , 97F
03/02 20:19, 97F
→
03/02 20:19, , 98F
03/02 20:19, 98F
→
03/02 20:19, , 99F
03/02 20:19, 99F
推
03/02 20:29, , 100F
03/02 20:29, 100F
→
03/02 20:29, , 101F
03/02 20:29, 101F
→
03/03 15:25, , 102F
03/03 15:25, 102F
→
03/03 15:26, , 103F
03/03 15:26, 103F
→
03/03 15:27, , 104F
03/03 15:27, 104F
→
03/03 15:29, , 105F
03/03 15:29, 105F
→
03/03 15:31, , 106F
03/03 15:31, 106F
討論串 (同標題文章)