Re: [討論] 30歲的工程師要有怎樣的水準有年薪200+?
※ 引述《houbuz (室內設計)》之銘言:
: 這幾年在五年就30了!!
: 發覺年紀越大
: 越覺得社會的現實?越來越能夠認清社會?!
: 請問一下電資類的工程師
: 30歲以前 能夠具備怎樣的能力 才有機會年薪200+
: 不要是用命換來的那種工作!!
: 有人知道嗎?可以分享一下
每次看到這種文章鴨
都會有點感觸
今天問30歲年薪200+
明天大概問35歲500+
之後大概問40歲1000+
是說
其實真的有心去問 大概也會問到個甚麼
甚麼公司甚麼職位甚麼階級可以拿多少錢之類der
只是阿
市場在變
技術在變
公司也在變
今天給你學會惹甚麼有點屌的東西
然後很威跑去mtk GG之類龍頭大廠的
偏偏帶雖過沒幾年龍頭大廠走下坡
阿自己會的那個頗秋的技術也變得不值錢惹
怎摸辦捏?
說真的喇
科技業看久惹喔
還真的沒看過甚麼技術可以秋三小秋個五年八年的
給你30歲200+
35歲喔 公司走下坡剩150+喇
然後跳外商100+不用加班 安慰自己cp值高
40歲的時候鴨 外商撤據點惹裁員GG
回家問自己一路走來剩蛇摸?
剩+5腫瘤喇幹
小朋友阿
這才是科技業的現狀
還想傻傻的進來擠
哪天死路邊就別上來靠杯
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 50.148.161.199
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Tech_Job/M.1427952563.A.3E8.html
推
04/02 13:31, , 1F
04/02 13:31, 1F
推
04/02 13:34, , 2F
04/02 13:34, 2F
推
04/02 13:35, , 3F
04/02 13:35, 3F
推
04/02 13:35, , 4F
04/02 13:35, 4F
推
04/02 13:36, , 5F
04/02 13:36, 5F
推
04/02 13:40, , 6F
04/02 13:40, 6F
推
04/02 13:40, , 7F
04/02 13:40, 7F
推
04/02 13:41, , 8F
04/02 13:41, 8F
推
04/02 13:41, , 9F
04/02 13:41, 9F
推
04/02 13:42, , 10F
04/02 13:42, 10F
推
04/02 13:45, , 11F
04/02 13:45, 11F
→
04/02 13:50, , 12F
04/02 13:50, 12F
推
04/02 13:56, , 13F
04/02 13:56, 13F
推
04/02 13:57, , 14F
04/02 13:57, 14F
→
04/02 14:02, , 15F
04/02 14:02, 15F
推
04/02 14:02, , 16F
04/02 14:02, 16F
推
04/02 14:20, , 17F
04/02 14:20, 17F
推
04/02 14:21, , 18F
04/02 14:21, 18F
推
04/02 14:30, , 19F
04/02 14:30, 19F
推
04/02 14:44, , 20F
04/02 14:44, 20F
→
04/02 14:51, , 21F
04/02 14:51, 21F
推
04/02 14:52, , 22F
04/02 14:52, 22F
推
04/02 14:58, , 23F
04/02 14:58, 23F
推
04/02 15:02, , 24F
04/02 15:02, 24F
推
04/02 15:08, , 25F
04/02 15:08, 25F
推
04/02 15:25, , 26F
04/02 15:25, 26F
推
04/02 15:27, , 27F
04/02 15:27, 27F
推
04/02 15:32, , 28F
04/02 15:32, 28F
→
04/02 15:33, , 29F
04/02 15:33, 29F
推
04/02 15:36, , 30F
04/02 15:36, 30F
推
04/02 15:37, , 31F
04/02 15:37, 31F
推
04/02 15:48, , 32F
04/02 15:48, 32F
推
04/02 15:50, , 33F
04/02 15:50, 33F
推
04/02 15:54, , 34F
04/02 15:54, 34F
推
04/02 15:57, , 35F
04/02 15:57, 35F
→
04/02 15:58, , 36F
04/02 15:58, 36F
→
04/02 16:03, , 37F
04/02 16:03, 37F
推
04/02 16:40, , 38F
04/02 16:40, 38F
推
04/02 16:44, , 39F
04/02 16:44, 39F
推
04/02 16:57, , 40F
04/02 16:57, 40F
推
04/02 16:58, , 41F
04/02 16:58, 41F
推
04/02 17:10, , 42F
04/02 17:10, 42F
推
04/02 17:17, , 43F
04/02 17:17, 43F
推
04/02 17:23, , 44F
04/02 17:23, 44F
→
04/02 17:25, , 45F
04/02 17:25, 45F
→
04/02 17:25, , 46F
04/02 17:25, 46F
→
04/02 17:25, , 47F
04/02 17:25, 47F
→
04/02 17:28, , 48F
04/02 17:28, 48F
推
04/02 17:30, , 49F
04/02 17:30, 49F
推
04/02 17:35, , 50F
04/02 17:35, 50F
推
04/02 17:47, , 51F
04/02 17:47, 51F
推
04/02 17:58, , 52F
04/02 17:58, 52F
推
04/02 18:15, , 53F
04/02 18:15, 53F
推
04/02 18:32, , 54F
04/02 18:32, 54F
推
04/02 18:49, , 55F
04/02 18:49, 55F
推
04/02 19:07, , 56F
04/02 19:07, 56F
推
04/02 19:09, , 57F
04/02 19:09, 57F
→
04/02 19:18, , 58F
04/02 19:18, 58F
推
04/02 20:51, , 59F
04/02 20:51, 59F
推
04/02 21:03, , 60F
04/02 21:03, 60F
推
04/02 21:09, , 61F
04/02 21:09, 61F
推
04/02 21:58, , 62F
04/02 21:58, 62F
推
04/02 22:22, , 63F
04/02 22:22, 63F
推
04/02 22:45, , 64F
04/02 22:45, 64F
推
04/02 23:19, , 65F
04/02 23:19, 65F
推
04/03 00:13, , 66F
04/03 00:13, 66F
推
04/03 00:15, , 67F
04/03 00:15, 67F
推
04/03 00:31, , 68F
04/03 00:31, 68F
推
04/03 00:32, , 69F
04/03 00:32, 69F
推
04/03 08:29, , 70F
04/03 08:29, 70F
推
04/03 08:58, , 71F
04/03 08:58, 71F
推
04/03 09:19, , 72F
04/03 09:19, 72F
推
04/03 23:16, , 73F
04/03 23:16, 73F
推
04/04 19:58, , 74F
04/04 19:58, 74F
→
04/04 19:58, , 75F
04/04 19:58, 75F
推
04/07 23:34, , 76F
04/07 23:34, 76F
→
04/13 21:25, , 77F
04/13 21:25, 77F
推
04/08 22:37, , 78F
04/08 22:37, 78F
→
04/08 22:37, , 79F
04/08 22:37, 79F
→
04/08 22:37, , 80F
04/08 22:37, 80F
推
10/09 16:34, , 81F
10/09 16:34, 81F
→
10/09 16:35, , 82F
10/09 16:35, 82F
→
10/09 16:36, , 83F
10/09 16:36, 83F
→
10/09 16:37, , 84F
10/09 16:37, 84F
→
10/09 16:38, , 85F
10/09 16:38, 85F
→
10/09 16:38, , 86F
10/09 16:38, 86F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 4 篇):