Fw: [請益] 私立科大畢 這樣有資格要求起薪32K嗎
※ [本文轉錄自 Soft_Job 看板 #1GNWMr5j ]
作者: asdrtyjkl925 (阿斯拉) 看板: Soft_Job
標題: [請益] 私立大學畢業,我這種身手有資格要求起薪
時間: Sun Sep 23 02:38:43 2012
大家好,小弟目前服志願役,服完四年準備要退伍了
前陣子在104爬了一下各大職缺所需要的能力
還真是嚇到了!
很多都是說要會java、c、c#、c++、sql、php、asp...等
簡直就像是要十項全能,讓小弟我當下挫折感很大
不過有學長提點,也在板上爬了文
似乎是如果自己有些基礎,進公司後還可以再學!
但問題也來了!
不知到我目前具備的夠不夠算得上"基礎"?
我在學校學過C,但只學到IF、迴圈,上到遞迴和指標開始沒很認真聽課
後面的就都聽不懂了^^"
SQL、JAVA、C++都只大略接觸過一點,都沒有比C更深入
(SQL現在應該差不多全忘了XD)
然後在軍中會幫單位寫一些EXCEL VBA,方便文書作業
我的實力,大概就到這邊…
再來就是起薪的部份
如果履歷上寫清楚想要的薪水,是否會比"依公司規定"來得好?
爬文時有爬到說如果數字開太低會給人"很弱"或"沒自信"的印象
倒是可以開稍高一點來給對方砍
我是中壢某私立科大畢業(最近剛改名的那間)
104上的資訊是:軟體工程師 私大學士 新鮮人起薪區間在28K~33K
那麼我就取中間值再高一點 32K
爬文後發現這個數字似乎也不會太過份
但,以我上面提到的實力,夠格談32K嗎^^" 會不會直接被刷掉啊?
PS.求職地點在桃園
希望大大們能指導一下,謝謝~~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 123.0.225.17
→
09/23 02:40, , 1F
09/23 02:40, 1F
推
09/23 02:44, , 2F
09/23 02:44, 2F
→
09/23 02:44, , 3F
09/23 02:44, 3F
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
※ 轉錄者: asdrtyjkl925 (123.0.225.17), 時間: 09/23/2012 02:45:09
噓
09/23 02:54, , 4F
09/23 02:54, 4F
→
09/23 03:15, , 5F
09/23 03:15, 5F
→
09/23 03:23, , 6F
09/23 03:23, 6F
噓
09/23 06:55, , 7F
09/23 06:55, 7F
→
09/23 07:31, , 8F
09/23 07:31, 8F
噓
09/23 08:24, , 9F
09/23 08:24, 9F
推
09/23 08:34, , 10F
09/23 08:34, 10F
→
09/23 08:34, , 11F
09/23 08:34, 11F
噓
09/23 09:02, , 12F
09/23 09:02, 12F
→
09/23 09:03, , 13F
09/23 09:03, 13F
→
09/23 09:04, , 14F
09/23 09:04, 14F
→
09/23 09:20, , 15F
09/23 09:20, 15F
→
09/23 09:21, , 16F
09/23 09:21, 16F
→
09/23 09:53, , 17F
09/23 09:53, 17F
→
09/23 09:53, , 18F
09/23 09:53, 18F
推
09/23 09:58, , 19F
09/23 09:58, 19F
→
09/23 10:17, , 20F
09/23 10:17, 20F
推
09/23 10:28, , 21F
09/23 10:28, 21F
→
09/23 10:28, , 22F
09/23 10:28, 22F
推
09/23 10:48, , 23F
09/23 10:48, 23F
→
09/23 10:49, , 24F
09/23 10:49, 24F
推
09/23 11:19, , 25F
09/23 11:19, 25F
→
09/23 11:20, , 26F
09/23 11:20, 26F
→
09/23 11:23, , 27F
09/23 11:23, 27F
推
09/23 11:39, , 28F
09/23 11:39, 28F
→
09/23 12:10, , 29F
09/23 12:10, 29F
→
09/23 12:10, , 30F
09/23 12:10, 30F
→
09/23 12:13, , 31F
09/23 12:13, 31F
→
09/23 12:21, , 32F
09/23 12:21, 32F
噓
09/23 12:26, , 33F
09/23 12:26, 33F
→
09/23 12:32, , 34F
09/23 12:32, 34F
→
09/23 12:33, , 35F
09/23 12:33, 35F
推
09/23 12:47, , 36F
09/23 12:47, 36F
→
09/23 12:47, , 37F
09/23 12:47, 37F
→
09/23 12:53, , 38F
09/23 12:53, 38F
推
09/23 12:57, , 39F
09/23 12:57, 39F
推
09/23 12:57, , 40F
09/23 12:57, 40F
→
09/23 12:58, , 41F
09/23 12:58, 41F
噓
09/23 13:11, , 42F
09/23 13:11, 42F
推
09/23 13:20, , 43F
09/23 13:20, 43F
→
09/23 13:28, , 44F
09/23 13:28, 44F
噓
09/23 14:14, , 45F
09/23 14:14, 45F
→
09/23 14:15, , 46F
09/23 14:15, 46F
推
09/23 14:22, , 47F
09/23 14:22, 47F
推
09/23 14:34, , 48F
09/23 14:34, 48F
→
09/23 16:58, , 49F
09/23 16:58, 49F
推
09/23 17:13, , 50F
09/23 17:13, 50F
推
09/23 17:19, , 51F
09/23 17:19, 51F
→
09/23 17:19, , 52F
09/23 17:19, 52F
→
09/23 17:20, , 53F
09/23 17:20, 53F
→
09/23 18:42, , 54F
09/23 18:42, 54F
→
09/23 18:42, , 55F
09/23 18:42, 55F
→
09/23 21:27, , 56F
09/23 21:27, 56F
推
09/23 21:53, , 57F
09/23 21:53, 57F
→
09/23 21:54, , 58F
09/23 21:54, 58F
推
09/23 22:08, , 59F
09/23 22:08, 59F
→
09/23 22:08, , 60F
09/23 22:08, 60F
推
09/23 22:10, , 61F
09/23 22:10, 61F
→
09/23 22:11, , 62F
09/23 22:11, 62F
推
09/23 22:12, , 63F
09/23 22:12, 63F
→
09/23 22:13, , 64F
09/23 22:13, 64F
噓
09/23 22:29, , 65F
09/23 22:29, 65F
噓
09/23 23:54, , 66F
09/23 23:54, 66F
噓
09/24 00:21, , 67F
09/24 00:21, 67F
推
09/24 01:16, , 68F
09/24 01:16, 68F
→
09/24 01:18, , 69F
09/24 01:18, 69F
→
09/24 01:19, , 70F
09/24 01:19, 70F
→
09/24 01:19, , 71F
09/24 01:19, 71F
推
09/24 10:55, , 72F
09/24 10:55, 72F
→
09/24 10:56, , 73F
09/24 10:56, 73F
→
09/24 10:57, , 74F
09/24 10:57, 74F
推
09/24 13:03, , 75F
09/24 13:03, 75F
→
09/24 18:33, , 76F
09/24 18:33, 76F
→
09/24 20:17, , 77F
09/24 20:17, 77F
推
09/24 22:05, , 78F
09/24 22:05, 78F
噓
09/25 00:03, , 79F
09/25 00:03, 79F
推
09/25 09:06, , 80F
09/25 09:06, 80F
推
09/25 21:54, , 81F
09/25 21:54, 81F
噓
09/26 16:38, , 82F
09/26 16:38, 82F
推
10/08 18:56, , 83F
10/08 18:56, 83F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):