Re: [閒聊] 荼蘼 A B方案的後面
這就是我擔心的呀,入戲太深就會變成這篇文這樣
事實上live文就經常有這種暴走的言論
看了真想翻白眼
拜託要討論劇情,有本事就針對導演跟編劇。
如果劇本寫的爛,有bug不合理,
身為觀眾可以把導演編劇叫來罵一頓
這些都是正向的討論
針對角色的私德?這樣真的好嗎?
角色們所做的事,不就是因為他們的性格
面對命運的安排,做出符合他們性格的行為
就算角色的性格你不喜歡,但那就是命中注定的事
又能怎樣呢?如果不是編劇安排這樣的性格的角色
劇本也不會往這樣的方向走,他們也是身不由已的呀
如果犏劇寫一個壞人,壞到人人都想罵
不就代表編劇成功?
我印象最深刻的一段就是,
b方案的有彥五年後為了小孩罵如薇
結果
a方案的有彥照樣也是在罵已成為妻子的高小姐
所以網友紛紛表示,不管怎樣有彥都不是好丈夫
問題跟本是在有彥身上,一個勁的罵有彥
結果:
a方案的有彥拒絕了舊愛,拒絕了要成為小三的如薇
因為高小姐的犧牲,對有彥來說更值得
b方案的有彥花7000挽回如薇的心
讓如薇疲憊的心得到治療
劇尾有彥的台詞:
其實我們剛才還吵架,但那些爭執
不過就是夫妻間的日常,也算是一種甜蜜
比對起第五集還有人罵有彥憑什麼精神出軌
第六集有彥這句台詞,正好重重的給觀眾打臉
没有人是聖人,可以完全沒有缺陷
被人用放大鏡找,都找不到缺點
但只憑一段罵老婆的劇情
就自已定論角色一切,只不過是見樹不見林而以
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 49.214.64.187
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/TaiwanDrama/M.1478884257.A.3D2.html
※ 編輯: mikiup0321 (49.214.64.187), 11/12/2016 01:12:27
→
11/12 01:19, , 1F
11/12 01:19, 1F
→
11/12 01:19, , 2F
11/12 01:19, 2F
推
11/12 01:25, , 3F
11/12 01:25, 3F
推
11/12 01:35, , 4F
11/12 01:35, 4F
→
11/12 01:35, , 5F
11/12 01:35, 5F
推
11/12 01:38, , 6F
11/12 01:38, 6F
推
11/12 01:39, , 7F
11/12 01:39, 7F
→
11/12 02:28, , 8F
11/12 02:28, 8F
推
11/12 02:29, , 9F
11/12 02:29, 9F
→
11/12 02:29, , 10F
11/12 02:29, 10F
→
11/12 02:29, , 11F
11/12 02:29, 11F
→
11/12 02:30, , 12F
11/12 02:30, 12F
→
11/12 02:30, , 13F
11/12 02:30, 13F
→
11/12 02:31, , 14F
11/12 02:31, 14F
→
11/12 02:32, , 15F
11/12 02:32, 15F
→
11/12 02:32, , 16F
11/12 02:32, 16F
→
11/12 02:33, , 17F
11/12 02:33, 17F
→
11/12 02:34, , 18F
11/12 02:34, 18F
推
11/12 05:20, , 19F
11/12 05:20, 19F
推
11/12 08:29, , 20F
11/12 08:29, 20F
→
11/12 08:29, , 21F
11/12 08:29, 21F
→
11/12 08:29, , 22F
11/12 08:29, 22F
推
11/12 09:03, , 23F
11/12 09:03, 23F
推
11/12 09:06, , 24F
11/12 09:06, 24F
→
11/12 09:07, , 25F
11/12 09:07, 25F
推
11/12 10:04, , 26F
11/12 10:04, 26F
→
11/12 10:05, , 27F
11/12 10:05, 27F
→
11/12 10:06, , 28F
11/12 10:06, 28F
→
11/12 10:07, , 29F
11/12 10:07, 29F
→
11/12 10:08, , 30F
11/12 10:08, 30F
推
11/12 10:09, , 31F
11/12 10:09, 31F
推
11/12 10:35, , 32F
11/12 10:35, 32F
→
11/12 10:36, , 33F
11/12 10:36, 33F
→
11/12 10:38, , 34F
11/12 10:38, 34F
→
11/12 10:42, , 35F
11/12 10:42, 35F
→
11/12 10:43, , 36F
11/12 10:43, 36F
推
11/12 10:47, , 37F
11/12 10:47, 37F
→
11/12 10:48, , 38F
11/12 10:48, 38F
→
11/12 10:49, , 39F
11/12 10:49, 39F
推
11/12 13:04, , 40F
11/12 13:04, 40F
推
11/12 14:09, , 41F
11/12 14:09, 41F
推
11/12 14:24, , 42F
11/12 14:24, 42F
→
11/12 14:24, , 43F
11/12 14:24, 43F
→
11/12 14:24, , 44F
11/12 14:24, 44F
→
11/12 14:24, , 45F
11/12 14:24, 45F
→
11/12 14:27, , 46F
11/12 14:27, 46F
→
11/12 14:51, , 47F
11/12 14:51, 47F
→
11/12 15:04, , 48F
11/12 15:04, 48F
→
11/12 15:22, , 49F
11/12 15:22, 49F
→
11/12 15:22, , 50F
11/12 15:22, 50F
→
11/12 15:22, , 51F
11/12 15:22, 51F
→
11/12 15:22, , 52F
11/12 15:22, 52F
→
11/12 15:23, , 53F
11/12 15:23, 53F
→
11/12 15:24, , 54F
11/12 15:24, 54F
→
11/12 15:24, , 55F
11/12 15:24, 55F
噓
11/12 15:29, , 56F
11/12 15:29, 56F
→
11/12 15:29, , 57F
11/12 15:29, 57F
→
11/12 15:30, , 58F
11/12 15:30, 58F
→
11/12 15:31, , 59F
11/12 15:31, 59F
→
11/12 15:35, , 60F
11/12 15:35, 60F
→
11/12 15:36, , 61F
11/12 15:36, 61F
→
11/12 15:36, , 62F
11/12 15:36, 62F
→
11/12 15:37, , 63F
11/12 15:37, 63F
→
11/12 15:37, , 64F
11/12 15:37, 64F
→
11/12 15:38, , 65F
11/12 15:38, 65F
→
11/12 15:38, , 66F
11/12 15:38, 66F
→
11/12 15:38, , 67F
11/12 15:38, 67F
→
11/12 15:39, , 68F
11/12 15:39, 68F
→
11/12 15:39, , 69F
11/12 15:39, 69F
→
11/12 15:39, , 70F
11/12 15:39, 70F
→
11/12 15:40, , 71F
11/12 15:40, 71F
→
11/12 15:40, , 72F
11/12 15:40, 72F
→
11/12 15:42, , 73F
11/12 15:42, 73F
→
11/12 15:42, , 74F
11/12 15:42, 74F
→
11/12 15:43, , 75F
11/12 15:43, 75F
→
11/12 15:47, , 76F
11/12 15:47, 76F
→
11/12 15:48, , 77F
11/12 15:48, 77F
→
11/12 15:48, , 78F
11/12 15:48, 78F
→
11/12 15:49, , 79F
11/12 15:49, 79F
噓
11/13 18:29, , 80F
11/13 18:29, 80F
推
11/14 12:39, , 81F
11/14 12:39, 81F
→
11/14 12:39, , 82F
11/14 12:39, 82F
→
11/14 12:39, , 83F
11/14 12:39, 83F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):
閒聊
15
83