[討論] 八大與三立 包裝與差異
◆ From: 111.251.105.43
推
05/27 00:42,
05/27 00:42
→
05/27 00:50,
05/27 00:50
→
05/27 00:51,
05/27 00:51
→
05/27 00:51,
05/27 00:51
推
05/27 01:16,
05/27 01:16
→
05/27 01:16,
05/27 01:16
→
05/27 01:16,
05/27 01:16
推
05/27 01:30,
05/27 01:30
推
05/27 01:40,
05/27 01:40
→
05/27 01:54,
05/27 01:54
→
05/27 01:54,
05/27 01:54
推
05/27 03:16,
05/27 03:16
推
05/27 03:24,
05/27 03:24
推
05/27 04:37,
05/27 04:37
→
05/27 08:21,
05/27 08:21
→
05/27 14:49,
05/27 14:49
推
05/27 16:09,
05/27 16:09
推
05/27 16:48,
05/27 16:48
推
05/27 22:58,
05/27 22:58
我針對我大致上了解的說一下好了,老實說這兩姐妹真的還不錯,可米也簽了不少女藝人
但就像大家說的,沒事就讓他們客串或者只有演女三
說是主演的,也大多是大頭演員很多(例如終極系列、萌學園)
但其實最主要還是卡在電視台部分
畢竟電視台還是需要有票房保證的
可米又是跟八大合作,決策權還是在八大身上
近年八大一直被三立幾乎是壓著打
主要還是因為八大走不出偶像劇
花大錢的部份應該都是花在演員身上,認為他們是收視保證。
但....從幾部戲上面來看,就發現策略不太對
例如近期的華麗的挑戰找了當紅韓國明星、絕對達令的汪大東
美樂加油的賀軍翔、王心凌
(無踩戲跟踩演員的意思)
很明顯這個走向已經不是台灣主流
而要說八大近期最受矚目的應該就是我可能不會愛妳
除了本身原創劇,最主要還有是它有主題性可以讓大家討論
而三立也都是用這樣的方式去做
【話題】,例如犀利人妻、小資女孩等等地
他先用話題去包裝,內容其實還是男女情愛居多
八大卻有絕大都是漫畫翻拍,我覺得他本意是認為漫畫有固定族群
但相對的也會有一種已經知道劇情的順向。缺乏討論空間。
當然八大本身也有原創且反應熱烈的終極系列
但畢竟這種類型的戲劇依然算特定族群會看的
如果八大可以多學學三立的鋪天蓋地的包裝,再配合時事。
也會有很多發展空間。
--
☆失控是生活的態度☆
http://www.wretch.cc/blog/keiiy49
☆現在的貓寶☆
http://www.wretch.cc/album/kdcating
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 101.13.202.3
推
05/29 23:18, , 1F
05/29 23:18, 1F
推
05/29 23:20, , 2F
05/29 23:20, 2F
推
05/29 23:20, , 3F
05/29 23:20, 3F
→
05/29 23:42, , 4F
05/29 23:42, 4F
→
05/29 23:56, , 5F
05/29 23:56, 5F
→
05/29 23:57, , 6F
05/29 23:57, 6F
推
05/29 23:57, , 7F
05/29 23:57, 7F
→
05/29 23:57, , 8F
05/29 23:57, 8F
推
05/30 00:07, , 9F
05/30 00:07, 9F
→
05/30 00:08, , 10F
05/30 00:08, 10F
推
05/30 00:38, , 11F
05/30 00:38, 11F
推
05/30 01:45, , 12F
05/30 01:45, 12F
推
05/30 02:04, , 13F
05/30 02:04, 13F
推
05/30 02:40, , 14F
05/30 02:40, 14F
→
05/30 02:40, , 15F
05/30 02:40, 15F
推
05/30 09:01, , 16F
05/30 09:01, 16F
推
05/30 09:17, , 17F
05/30 09:17, 17F
推
05/30 09:21, , 18F
05/30 09:21, 18F
推
05/30 09:23, , 19F
05/30 09:23, 19F
還有 39 則推文
→
05/30 13:05, , 59F
05/30 13:05, 59F
→
05/30 13:06, , 60F
05/30 13:06, 60F
→
05/30 13:06, , 61F
05/30 13:06, 61F
→
05/30 13:07, , 62F
05/30 13:07, 62F
推
05/30 13:20, , 63F
05/30 13:20, 63F
推
05/30 13:37, , 64F
05/30 13:37, 64F
推
05/30 13:38, , 65F
05/30 13:38, 65F
推
05/30 13:40, , 66F
05/30 13:40, 66F
推
05/30 14:06, , 67F
05/30 14:06, 67F
→
05/30 14:09, , 68F
05/30 14:09, 68F
→
05/30 14:57, , 69F
05/30 14:57, 69F
→
05/30 14:57, , 70F
05/30 14:57, 70F
推
05/30 15:09, , 71F
05/30 15:09, 71F
→
05/30 15:10, , 72F
05/30 15:10, 72F
→
05/30 15:11, , 73F
05/30 15:11, 73F
→
05/30 15:11, , 74F
05/30 15:11, 74F
→
05/30 15:12, , 75F
05/30 15:12, 75F
→
05/30 15:13, , 76F
05/30 15:13, 76F
→
05/30 16:06, , 77F
05/30 16:06, 77F
推
05/30 22:51, , 78F
05/30 22:51, 78F
→
05/30 22:51, , 79F
05/30 22:51, 79F
→
05/30 22:52, , 80F
05/30 22:52, 80F
推
05/31 00:04, , 81F
05/31 00:04, 81F
→
05/31 00:05, , 82F
05/31 00:05, 82F
→
05/31 00:05, , 83F
05/31 00:05, 83F
→
05/31 00:06, , 84F
05/31 00:06, 84F
→
05/31 00:07, , 85F
05/31 00:07, 85F
→
05/31 00:07, , 86F
05/31 00:07, 86F
推
05/31 00:09, , 87F
05/31 00:09, 87F
→
05/31 00:09, , 88F
05/31 00:09, 88F
推
05/31 00:14, , 89F
05/31 00:14, 89F
→
05/31 00:14, , 90F
05/31 00:14, 90F
推
05/31 00:25, , 91F
05/31 00:25, 91F
→
05/31 00:25, , 92F
05/31 00:25, 92F
→
05/31 00:26, , 93F
05/31 00:26, 93F
→
05/31 00:26, , 94F
05/31 00:26, 94F
推
05/31 15:18, , 95F
05/31 15:18, 95F
→
05/31 15:35, , 96F
05/31 15:35, 96F
推
05/31 18:41, , 97F
05/31 18:41, 97F
推
06/01 10:51, , 98F
06/01 10:51, 98F