Re: [問題] 放假標準有區分「半天、全天、晚上」嗎?已回收
我來告訴你好了
版上很多這次一直提數據未達標,鬼遮眼似的護神
拜託~~~是強颱好嗎,還依稀記得小時候電視除了放假一天
政府還會狂打廣告要人民做好防颱準備
不知什麼時候變成啥鬼數據(重點是台灣氣象局預測都超爛,數據更不用提了)
還出現什麼不放假神預測這類鬼話~~~
颱風假除了保障市民的身命財產安全
另一個用意也是為了讓人們提早做好準備
如果照賴神那種鬼說法,那試問等等晚上9點風力降下去了未達標
我可以馬上叫你上班嗎~~~你要嗎~~你肯嗎~~~~你知道勞工的痛苦嗎
你以為大家都像官員和慣老闆住豪宅坐豪車,只在乎經濟效益,不知民間疾苦嗎
最後可以小小聲喊一下嗎~~~我絕對不會在投民進黨
現在看賴市長,有時候根本都感覺我好像在看另一個馬英九!超~~~~爛~~~~~
時代力量可以來台南參選市長嗎~~~~~我會投你們
※ 引述《musicanuda (musicanuda)》之銘言:
: 沒有要罵賴清德
: 只是就這次的判斷來請教
: 上午確實沒達放假標準
: 但下午顯然超標
: 想請問的是,法令規定有區分「半天、全天、晚上」嗎?
: 若有,執政者也只能依法行事
: 賴清德的解釋有其道理
: 若沒有,該放半天或者全天,就是政治責任
: 而賴清德的解釋就變成民忿了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.255.242.186
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Tainan/M.1473844012.A.5B3.html
推
09/14 17:07, , 1F
09/14 17:07, 1F
推
09/14 17:08, , 2F
09/14 17:08, 2F
推
09/14 17:08, , 3F
09/14 17:08, 3F
推
09/14 17:08, , 4F
09/14 17:08, 4F
推
09/14 17:08, , 5F
09/14 17:08, 5F
→
09/14 17:08, , 6F
09/14 17:08, 6F
→
09/14 17:08, , 7F
09/14 17:08, 7F
→
09/14 17:09, , 8F
09/14 17:09, 8F
推
09/14 17:09, , 9F
09/14 17:09, 9F
→
09/14 17:09, , 10F
09/14 17:09, 10F
→
09/14 17:09, , 11F
09/14 17:09, 11F
推
09/14 17:09, , 12F
09/14 17:09, 12F
→
09/14 17:09, , 13F
09/14 17:09, 13F
→
09/14 17:09, , 14F
09/14 17:09, 14F
推
09/14 17:10, , 15F
09/14 17:10, 15F
推
09/14 17:10, , 16F
09/14 17:10, 16F
→
09/14 17:10, , 17F
09/14 17:10, 17F
→
09/14 17:10, , 18F
09/14 17:10, 18F
推
09/14 17:11, , 19F
09/14 17:11, 19F
→
09/14 17:11, , 20F
09/14 17:11, 20F
噓
09/14 17:11, , 21F
09/14 17:11, 21F
→
09/14 17:11, , 22F
09/14 17:11, 22F
推
09/14 17:12, , 23F
09/14 17:12, 23F
→
09/14 17:12, , 24F
09/14 17:12, 24F
→
09/14 17:12, , 25F
09/14 17:12, 25F
推
09/14 17:12, , 26F
09/14 17:12, 26F
推
09/14 17:12, , 27F
09/14 17:12, 27F
噓
09/14 17:13, , 28F
09/14 17:13, 28F
→
09/14 17:13, , 29F
09/14 17:13, 29F
→
09/14 17:13, , 30F
09/14 17:13, 30F
推
09/14 17:13, , 31F
09/14 17:13, 31F
→
09/14 17:13, , 32F
09/14 17:13, 32F
→
09/14 17:14, , 33F
09/14 17:14, 33F
推
09/14 17:15, , 34F
09/14 17:15, 34F
推
09/14 17:15, , 35F
09/14 17:15, 35F
推
09/14 17:16, , 36F
09/14 17:16, 36F
→
09/14 17:18, , 37F
09/14 17:18, 37F
推
09/14 17:19, , 38F
09/14 17:19, 38F
推
09/14 17:20, , 39F
09/14 17:20, 39F
推
09/14 17:20, , 40F
09/14 17:20, 40F
推
09/14 17:20, , 41F
09/14 17:20, 41F
推
09/14 17:23, , 42F
09/14 17:23, 42F
→
09/14 17:23, , 43F
09/14 17:23, 43F
→
09/14 17:23, , 44F
09/14 17:23, 44F
→
09/14 17:25, , 45F
09/14 17:25, 45F
推
09/14 17:26, , 46F
09/14 17:26, 46F
→
09/14 17:26, , 47F
09/14 17:26, 47F
→
09/14 17:27, , 48F
09/14 17:27, 48F
→
09/14 17:27, , 49F
09/14 17:27, 49F
→
09/14 17:28, , 50F
09/14 17:28, 50F
→
09/14 17:28, , 51F
09/14 17:28, 51F
推
09/14 17:29, , 52F
09/14 17:29, 52F
→
09/14 17:31, , 53F
09/14 17:31, 53F
推
09/14 17:45, , 54F
09/14 17:45, 54F
→
09/14 17:54, , 55F
09/14 17:54, 55F
推
09/14 17:55, , 56F
09/14 17:55, 56F
→
09/14 17:56, , 57F
09/14 17:56, 57F
→
09/14 17:59, , 58F
09/14 17:59, 58F
→
09/14 18:01, , 59F
09/14 18:01, 59F
→
09/14 18:06, , 60F
09/14 18:06, 60F
噓
09/14 18:45, , 61F
09/14 18:45, 61F
推
09/14 19:47, , 62F
09/14 19:47, 62F
推
09/14 20:50, , 63F
09/14 20:50, 63F
噓
09/14 20:56, , 64F
09/14 20:56, 64F
→
09/14 22:20, , 65F
09/14 22:20, 65F
推
09/14 23:37, , 66F
09/14 23:37, 66F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):