[問題] 賴為了因應下午通勤族,強迫開車,有違法嗎 已刪文
雖然加開車班對於他的錯誤決策,是好的
不過不是說下午停班停課(自打嘴巴?
但我的點在於,有無逾越安全規範,而造成違法?
台鐵高層不是說風太大,超過25米/秒,就必須停駛
然後跟賴清德市長橋一橋之後
又變成可以行駛
(因為被下午要回家的通勤族罵翻)
列車安全規範,為什麼可以無視
這之間有沒有違法?
有沒有草菅人命?
以上內容一定要打台南嗎?
好制式喔~!
我以為大家都知道在台南的事物
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.174.132.1
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Tainan/M.1473829739.A.AC7.html
噓
09/14 13:09, , 1F
09/14 13:09, 1F
台南版事務,不能這邊討論嗎
噓
09/14 13:10, , 2F
09/14 13:10, 2F
→
09/14 13:10, , 3F
09/14 13:10, 3F
不能賭命啊~!
可是台鐵和市長協商之後...不是要配合政府加開_ _列車
※ 編輯: rossleu (1.174.132.1), 09/14/2016 13:11:16
推
09/14 13:11, , 4F
09/14 13:11, 4F
噓
09/14 13:11, , 5F
09/14 13:11, 5F
經南市協調台鐵局,今(14)天下2點時前,台鐵將選擇幾班嘉義=高雄區間車提供服務
惟實際開車情況及班次資訊,仍請民眾以台鐵局網站的公告為準.
※ 編輯: rossleu (1.174.132.1), 09/14/2016 13:13:20
推
09/14 13:13, , 6F
09/14 13:13, 6F
→
09/14 13:13, , 7F
09/14 13:13, 7F
一開始就說下午不開了,協商了之後...
很明顯是被迫開車的
→
09/14 13:13, , 8F
09/14 13:13, 8F
→
09/14 13:13, , 9F
09/14 13:13, 9F
推
09/14 13:14, , 10F
09/14 13:14, 10F
→
09/14 13:14, , 11F
09/14 13:14, 11F
版主,我有問題
為什麼是 2 次提醒?
第一次發問
1-4-2 廢問
發文內容不到30字內(不含標點符號)、不禮貌、精華區有大量資訊者,
視為廢問,直接刪文,連續發廢問者水桶。(其他標題文章比照辦理)
我不覺得這是廢問請問辦別標準在?
→
09/14 13:15, , 12F
09/14 13:15, 12F
※ 編輯: rossleu (1.174.132.1), 09/14/2016 13:17:08
→
09/14 13:17, , 13F
09/14 13:17, 13F
改標第一次?第二次?
不太懂
※ 編輯: rossleu (1.174.132.1), 09/14/2016 13:18:01
→
09/14 13:18, , 14F
09/14 13:18, 14F
我覺得這個問題很嚴肅
賴市長不應該逾越台鐵的安全規範!
若是人員無傷亡
車子構造必定也會超過原廠負荷而有所耗損
※ 編輯: rossleu (1.174.132.1), 09/14/2016 13:18:51
→
09/14 13:18, , 15F
09/14 13:18, 15F
不好意思我不知道你改標
然後內文有增加內容吧?
我一直在增加字幕
推
09/14 13:18, , 16F
09/14 13:18, 16F
→
09/14 13:18, , 17F
09/14 13:18, 17F
※ 編輯: rossleu (1.174.132.1), 09/14/2016 13:19:36
→
09/14 13:19, , 18F
09/14 13:19, 18F
→
09/14 13:19, , 19F
09/14 13:19, 19F
我覺得嚴重相關!!!
請問您覺得無關的點在哪裡
→
09/14 13:19, , 20F
09/14 13:19, 20F
※ 編輯: rossleu (1.174.132.1), 09/14/2016 13:20:31
推
09/14 13:20, , 21F
09/14 13:20, 21F
→
09/14 13:20, , 22F
09/14 13:20, 22F
推
09/14 13:21, , 23F
09/14 13:21, 23F
→
09/14 13:21, , 24F
09/14 13:21, 24F
→
09/14 13:21, , 25F
09/14 13:21, 25F
→
09/14 13:21, , 26F
09/14 13:21, 26F
我不知道要改什麼標題
我覺得版主判別基準好怪喔
※ 編輯: rossleu (1.174.132.1), 09/14/2016 13:22:27
還有 136 則推文
還有 16 段內文
→
09/14 13:58, , 163F
09/14 13:58, 163F
→
09/14 13:58, , 164F
09/14 13:58, 164F
噓
09/14 13:59, , 165F
09/14 13:59, 165F
→
09/14 13:59, , 166F
09/14 13:59, 166F
推
09/14 14:01, , 167F
09/14 14:01, 167F
→
09/14 14:01, , 168F
09/14 14:01, 168F
推
09/14 14:01, , 169F
09/14 14:01, 169F
→
09/14 14:01, , 170F
09/14 14:01, 170F
→
09/14 14:02, , 171F
09/14 14:02, 171F
推
09/14 14:02, , 172F
09/14 14:02, 172F
噓
09/14 14:03, , 173F
09/14 14:03, 173F
推
09/14 14:09, , 174F
09/14 14:09, 174F
→
09/14 14:09, , 175F
09/14 14:09, 175F
→
09/14 14:09, , 176F
09/14 14:09, 176F
→
09/14 14:09, , 177F
09/14 14:09, 177F
→
09/14 14:11, , 178F
09/14 14:11, 178F
→
09/14 14:11, , 179F
09/14 14:11, 179F
推
09/14 14:17, , 180F
09/14 14:17, 180F
→
09/14 14:21, , 181F
09/14 14:21, 181F
→
09/14 14:24, , 182F
09/14 14:24, 182F
→
09/14 14:24, , 183F
09/14 14:24, 183F
推
09/14 14:25, , 184F
09/14 14:25, 184F
推
09/14 14:36, , 185F
09/14 14:36, 185F
推
09/14 14:40, , 186F
09/14 14:40, 186F
→
09/14 14:40, , 187F
09/14 14:40, 187F
推
09/14 14:45, , 188F
09/14 14:45, 188F
推
09/14 14:48, , 189F
09/14 14:48, 189F
→
09/14 14:48, , 190F
09/14 14:48, 190F
推
09/14 14:48, , 191F
09/14 14:48, 191F
推
09/14 14:58, , 192F
09/14 14:58, 192F
推
09/14 15:08, , 193F
09/14 15:08, 193F
→
09/14 15:08, , 194F
09/14 15:08, 194F
推
09/14 15:12, , 195F
09/14 15:12, 195F
推
09/14 15:28, , 196F
09/14 15:28, 196F
噓
09/14 15:30, , 197F
09/14 15:30, 197F
推
09/14 15:31, , 198F
09/14 15:31, 198F
推
09/14 15:33, , 199F
09/14 15:33, 199F
推
09/14 15:36, , 200F
09/14 15:36, 200F
噓
09/14 15:43, , 201F
09/14 15:43, 201F
推
09/14 15:52, , 202F
09/14 15:52, 202F