Re: [題目] should,would,must搞不懂
※ 引述《furuyahyde ( )》之銘言:
: 問題有點多 因為書上給的解答有回答根沒回答一樣
: 題目一:During my schooldays,I______ go to the library after class.
: (1).would
: (2).should
: (3).ought to
: (4).have to
: 疑問:答案是(1)would 但是為什麼不能選(4)have to?
[解析]:
其實這題考你的只是時態問題,During my school days就表示「過去式」,
(4) have to只可以表示「現在」、「未來」。
而should(= ought to)只有在「子句」當中可以表示「過去」,不然都用had to。
ex. My father told me [that students should follow the haircut regulation].
: 題目二:I tried to dissuade him from his plane,but he_____ not hear my advice.
: (1).will
: (2).would
: (3).shall
: (4).should
: 答案還是would 我選should 照語意選should 他應該沒有聽我的建議.
: 這樣不能選should嗎?
[解析]:
should其實的確可以表示「可能性」,不過只用在肯定句。
ex. The bus should arrive in a few minutes.
如果用在否定的「可能性」,就用may或might,不舉例了。
所以should not會翻譯做「不應該」,先不論文法,這裡的文意是不會合的。
: 題目三:I have known many who could not when they ______, for they had not
: done it when they could.
: (1).did
: (2).would
: (3).might
: (4).could
: 這題不懂 但是他後面詳解竟然只寫了 照語意選would 但是連翻譯都沒翻譯= =
[解析]:
沒翻譯是挺扯的:
「我知道很多人願意去做卻沒能力做,因為他們有能力的時候不去做。」
will除了表示「未來式」還有「願意(= beV willing to)」的意思。
這裡的would就當「願意」的過去式,噢當然,would還有個意思叫做「會」,
表示「傾向」,用在現在或是未來:
ex. Mothers would protect their children if they are in danger.
: 題目四:I've lost one of my gloves. I __________ it somewhere.
: (1).have been dropped
: (2).should have dropped
: (3).must have dropped
: (4).could be dropped
: 答案(3) 但為何不能選(2) 翻成"我應該掉在某個地方". 這樣不能選should嗎?
[解析]:
這題有兩個觀念要講一下:
1. should have + Vpp:過去早該(表示過去應該這麼做卻沒這麼做)
ex. I should have listened to him, but I didn't.
(我早該聽他話的,但我沒聽。)
2. must/may/might + have Vpp:表示對過去的肯定推測
ex. It must be raining outside. (表示「現在」)
ex. It must have rained last night, for the ground now is wet.
(表示「過去」)
你這題表示的就是「過去一定」。
: 題目五:She was too nervous to reply,but fortunately she _____ anything.
: (1).didn't need to say
: (2).needn't to say
: (3).needed not say
: (4).needn't have said
: 答案(1) 但是need本身不是也可以當助動詞使用嗎??? 所以4不能選嗎?
[解析]:
need使用情況:
1. 在肯定句中,need當一般動詞,後面如果接動詞要有to Vr。
ex. I need to do it now.
2. 在否定或是疑問句中,need可當一般動詞,也可當助動詞。
need當助動詞時,不加s也不加ed。
ex. He didn't need to answer your question. [一般動詞]
= He needn't answer your question.[助動詞]
ex. Did he need to answer my question? [一般動詞]
= Need he answer my question? [助動詞]
3. didn't need to Vr:過去不需要,事實上也沒這麼做
needn't have Vpp:過去不需要,但是事實上卻這麼做了(過去相反假設)
ex. We didn't need to hurry, since we had plenty of time.
ex. We needn't have hurried, but we woke up too late.
希望有所助益。
: 麻煩高手解答 越詳細越好
: 順便指正我觀念錯在哪? 我會以微薄的p幣致謝
: 因為這種題目出現了N遍還是錯 看了文法書好像會
: 但寫題目又是另外一回事了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.194.112.222
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/TOEIC/M.1433586496.A.5D4.html
→
06/06 18:29, , 1F
06/06 18:29, 1F
→
06/06 18:30, , 2F
06/06 18:30, 2F
推
06/06 19:51, , 3F
06/06 19:51, 3F
→
06/06 20:02, , 4F
06/06 20:02, 4F
推
06/06 20:52, , 5F
06/06 20:52, 5F
推
06/06 22:50, , 6F
06/06 22:50, 6F
推
06/06 23:26, , 7F
06/06 23:26, 7F
推
06/07 03:38, , 8F
06/07 03:38, 8F
推
06/07 20:16, , 9F
06/07 20:16, 9F
推
06/07 20:23, , 10F
06/07 20:23, 10F
推
06/09 17:57, , 11F
06/09 17:57, 11F
推
06/10 03:08, , 12F
06/10 03:08, 12F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):