Re: [題目] should,would,must搞不懂

看板TOEIC作者 (iphone)時間9年前 (2015/06/06 18:28), 編輯推噓9(903)
留言12則, 10人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
※ 引述《furuyahyde ( )》之銘言: : 問題有點多 因為書上給的解答有回答根沒回答一樣 : 題目一:During my schooldays,I______ go to the library after class. : (1).would : (2).should : (3).ought to : (4).have to : 疑問:答案是(1)would 但是為什麼不能選(4)have to? [解析]: 其實這題考你的只是時態問題,During my school days就表示「過去式」, (4) have to只可以表示「現在」、「未來」。 而should(= ought to)只有在「子句」當中可以表示「過去」,不然都用had to。 ex. My father told me [that students should follow the haircut regulation]. : 題目二:I tried to dissuade him from his plane,but he_____ not hear my advice. : (1).will : (2).would : (3).shall : (4).should : 答案還是would 我選should 照語意選should 他應該沒有聽我的建議. : 這樣不能選should嗎? [解析]: should其實的確可以表示「可能性」,不過只用在肯定句。 ex. The bus should arrive in a few minutes. 如果用在否定的「可能性」,就用may或might,不舉例了。 所以should not會翻譯做「不應該」,先不論文法,這裡的文意是不會合的。 : 題目三:I have known many who could not when they ______, for they had not : done it when they could. : (1).did : (2).would : (3).might : (4).could : 這題不懂 但是他後面詳解竟然只寫了 照語意選would 但是連翻譯都沒翻譯= = [解析]: 沒翻譯是挺扯的: 「我知道很多人願意去做卻沒能力做,因為他們有能力的時候不去做。」 will除了表示「未來式」還有「願意(= beV willing to)」的意思。 這裡的would就當「願意」的過去式,噢當然,would還有個意思叫做「會」, 表示「傾向」,用在現在或是未來: ex. Mothers would protect their children if they are in danger. : 題目四:I've lost one of my gloves. I __________ it somewhere. : (1).have been dropped : (2).should have dropped : (3).must have dropped : (4).could be dropped : 答案(3) 但為何不能選(2) 翻成"我應該掉在某個地方". 這樣不能選should嗎? [解析]: 這題有兩個觀念要講一下: 1. should have + Vpp:過去早該(表示過去應該這麼做卻沒這麼做) ex. I should have listened to him, but I didn't. (我早該聽他話的,但我沒聽。) 2. must/may/might + have Vpp:表示對過去的肯定推測 ex. It must be raining outside. (表示「現在」) ex. It must have rained last night, for the ground now is wet. (表示「過去」) 你這題表示的就是「過去一定」。 : 題目五:She was too nervous to reply,but fortunately she _____ anything. : (1).didn't need to say : (2).needn't to say : (3).needed not say : (4).needn't have said : 答案(1) 但是need本身不是也可以當助動詞使用嗎??? 所以4不能選嗎? [解析]: need使用情況: 1. 在肯定句中,need當一般動詞,後面如果接動詞要有to Vr。 ex. I need to do it now. 2. 在否定或是疑問句中,need可當一般動詞,也可當助動詞need當助動詞時,不加s也不加ed。 ex. He didn't need to answer your question. [一般動詞] = He needn't answer your question.[助動詞] ex. Did he need to answer my question? [一般動詞] = Need he answer my question? [助動詞] 3. didn't need to Vr:過去不需要,事實上也沒這麼做 needn't have Vpp:過去不需要,但是事實上卻這麼做了(過去相反假設) ex. We didn't need to hurry, since we had plenty of time. ex. We needn't have hurried, but we woke up too late. 希望有所助益。 : 麻煩高手解答 越詳細越好 : 順便指正我觀念錯在哪? 我會以微薄的p幣致謝 : 因為這種題目出現了N遍還是錯 看了文法書好像會 : 但寫題目又是另外一回事了 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.194.112.222 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/TOEIC/M.1433586496.A.5D4.html

06/06 18:29, , 1F
然後,原PO如果覺得有所助益,不用給我P幣。
06/06 18:29, 1F

06/06 18:30, , 2F
可以的話,讓自己對世界有幫助就好了。
06/06 18:30, 2F

06/06 19:51, , 3F
原po對於should的翻譯 是我從來沒想過的..好特殊
06/06 19:51, 3F

06/06 20:02, , 4F
啊?怎樣特殊?
06/06 20:02, 4F

06/06 20:52, , 5F
06/06 20:52, 5F

06/06 22:50, , 6F
寫的好詳細
06/06 22:50, 6F

06/06 23:26, , 7F
06/06 23:26, 7F

06/07 03:38, , 8F
推!
06/07 03:38, 8F

06/07 20:16, , 9F
06/07 20:16, 9F

06/07 20:23, , 10F
只能推了
06/07 20:23, 10F

06/09 17:57, , 11F
精采
06/09 17:57, 11F

06/10 03:08, , 12F
我也推!原po對這些助動的理解超深der
06/10 03:08, 12F
文章代碼(AID): #1LSij0NK (TOEIC)
文章代碼(AID): #1LSij0NK (TOEIC)