Re: [討論] 先行詞-主格/受格傻傻分不清 @@
看到此篇文章,不知道是不是這樣的道理,也請各位大大幫忙指點
還原題目
C1 : I bought a book. C2: A book is required for the project.
被動式是指 "主詞" 是動作的承受者而不是動作的發出者。
所以 C2 的 結構為: A book is required for the project.
~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
S. V.
C1 : I bought a book. C2: A book is required for the project.
~~~~~~ ~~~~~~
先行詞 S.
先行詞為物,判斷關代為which, which取代第二句的A book
所以句子成為
C1 : I bought a book. C2: which is required for the project.
~~~~~~~ ~~~~~
S.
關代是以第二句的位置來判斷是主詞還是受詞
所以which在此為主格關代
合併兩句,最後句子呈現為
I bought a book which is required for the project.
以上,是小妹的想法
然後...有一個白癡疑問
A book is required "for the project".
為啥不是 "by the project" >"<
工程需要一本書, 哈哈好像是有點怪後
如有錯誤,請各位指點 感恩
不專業下台一鞠躬 謝謝!
※ 引述《dadala (dadala)》之銘言:
: I brought a book which is required for the project.
: 為什麼which在這裡是"主格關係詞"?
: I brought a book. 書不是被我買了嗎? 不是受詞喔??
: A book is required for the project. 書 is required, 不是受詞喔?
: 或者, required在這裡是形容詞, 不是被動式?
: 文法停留在國中階段, @ @
: 感謝各位耐心解答.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.81.87.161
→
08/20 07:55, , 1F
08/20 07:55, 1F
→
08/20 07:56, , 2F
08/20 07:56, 2F
→
08/20 07:56, , 3F
08/20 07:56, 3F
→
08/20 09:09, , 4F
08/20 09:09, 4F
→
08/20 09:12, , 5F
08/20 09:12, 5F
→
08/20 09:12, , 6F
08/20 09:12, 6F
→
08/20 10:17, , 7F
08/20 10:17, 7F
→
08/20 10:18, , 8F
08/20 10:18, 8F
→
08/20 10:19, , 9F
08/20 10:19, 9F
→
08/20 10:19, , 10F
08/20 10:19, 10F
→
08/20 10:50, , 11F
08/20 10:50, 11F
推
08/20 20:44, , 12F
08/20 20:44, 12F
→
08/20 20:44, , 13F
08/20 20:44, 13F
→
08/20 20:45, , 14F
08/20 20:45, 14F
→
08/06 14:57, , 15F
08/06 14:57, 15F
→
09/07 01:48, , 16F
09/07 01:48, 16F
→
12/02 20:27, , 17F
12/02 20:27, 17F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 3 篇):