Re: [題目] 請各位幫忙分析這題-金色證書
※ 引述《lesha (挑戰~~~)》之銘言：
: ---------為加速板友們提供解答，請仿照以下範例提供足夠題目資訊-----------------
: 標題請依 [題目] Longman 3/e Pxx(頁數) or [題目] OG Pxx(頁數) 的格式
: 書名：金色證書
: 版本：
: 頁數：p.135 139題
: 題目：
: 139. ______ wishing to apply for the opening in the IT Department should
: speak to MS. Pender to obtain the necessary forms.
: (A) Those
: (B) Who
: (C) These
: (D) They
: 疑問：為甚麼是A, 而不是D, 我覺的主詞是人的話 A,C,D
完整句：
Those people [who wish to apply for the opening in the IT Department] should
speak to MS. Pender to obtain the necessary forms.
句中 who 到 should 是關係子句 形容 those people 的狀況
1. Those = Those people, people 省略
2. Who 省略，所以句中變成一個主詞對兩個動詞，強碰，故非主要句的動詞 wish 改成
動名詞。
(A) Those = Those people 老外愛用 Those 代表 "人" 是慣用語
(B) Who 是關係代名詞 前面一定要有個名詞當主詞 文法錯誤
ex. People who, Mary who, The dog which, etc.
(C) These 不直接加動名詞 通常後面會接名詞(主詞) 再加who,which 再接動詞
These pens which are blue are mine.
These dogs which know Aunti Annie are my cousin's.
Whose are these? 這些東西是誰的？ These = These things
These girls who wear green shirts are from Taipei's first girl school.
= Those who wear green shirts are from Taipei's first .......
= Those wearing green shirts are from ....
these 跟 who.which 都還會放一個名詞 去說明"這個"是什麼
只能說 還是慣用法
(D) 關係子句(who, which)不會用 I, you, he, she, they, we 等字當主詞
因為上面代名詞 已經有限定是某某人的意思(通常都同個人講第二次以上了)
不需要再用關係子句再另加說明～
Ex. John is my classmate. He went swimming with Mary last week.
John = He (講這兩句大家都知道"約翰"就是"他")
John [he went swimming with Mary last week] is my classmate.
此時兩個主詞強碰 John是主要名詞 he是代名詞
所以 John 留下 he 用 who 代替
John [who went swimming with Mary last week] is my classmate.
關係代名詞 基本上就有代替原本"代名詞"的意味
關代前面的名詞都會是姓名(John, Mary等) Those pens、the student 等等
但同名字通常不只一個人(例如美國叫約翰的就一堆) 筆跟學生也有很多不同類型
所以必須用關代去代替原本的代名詞 去闡述哪個特定的對象
The student [who wears a black jeans] is Dr. Ho's child.
= The student is Dr. Ho's child. He wears a black jeans.
代名詞類只有一種狀況後面會有 who 就是當 HE 代表 God 時(尤其是聖經裡)
Ex. He who built up the world will watch over us.
建造這世界的上帝，會眷顧我們。
不小心打了很多，希望你看得懂！
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 58.115.188.10
※ 編輯: petitbeau 來自: 58.115.188.10 (10/31 02:44)
推
10/31 11:02, , 1F
10/31 11:02, 1F
推
11/01 18:52, , 2F
11/01 18:52, 2F
推
11/02 18:03, , 3F
11/02 18:03, 3F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文：
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇)：