[請益] 黃金閱讀 RUNNING WATER ON MARS

看板TOEFL_iBT作者 (wedwsed)時間13年前 (2010/09/13 12:34), 編輯推噓1(215)
留言8則, 3人參與, 最新討論串1/5 (看更多)
But detractors maintain that the terraces could also have been created by geological activity, perhaps related to the geologic forces that depressed the Northern Hemisphere far below the level of the south, in which case they have nothing whatever to do with Martian water. 9. Which of the sentences below best expresses the essential information in the highlighted sentence in the passage? Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or leave out essential information. ○But detractors argue that geological activity may be responsible for the water associated with the terraces. ○But detractors argue that the terraces may have been formed by geological activity rather than by the presence of water. ○But detractors argue that the terraces may be related to geological forces in the Northern Hemisphere of Mars, rather than to Martian water in the south. ○But detractors argue that geological forces depressed the Northern Hemisphere so far below the level of the south that the terraces could not have been formed by water. 想請問 答案為何是2不是4? 其實我分辨不出來2跟4的差別 在我看來是覺得4說得比較詳盡 所以選4..請幫忙指導一下 感激 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.217.61.116

09/13 12:55, , 1F
4缺少geological activity跟the terraces的關係, 2正確
09/13 12:55, 1F

09/14 01:05, , 2F
個人覺得4)的terraces could not have been formed by water
09/14 01:05, 2F

09/14 01:07, , 3F
描述與過去事實相反 意思就是那句話是肯定過去由水形成 與
09/14 01:07, 3F

09/14 01:07, , 4F
文意不符
09/14 01:07, 4F

09/14 08:33, , 5F
跟事實相反?? 樓上說的我看不懂 哪裡相反了??
09/14 08:33, 5F

09/14 10:06, , 6F
樓上經期失調? 我只是提供我個人理解 could (not) have+p.p
09/14 10:06, 6F

09/14 10:07, , 7F
本來就能解釋成與過去事實相反,當然也是可以解釋成正面的推
09/14 10:07, 7F

09/14 10:08, , 8F
測,你回就好好回,沒事發什麼神經??
09/14 10:08, 8F
文章代碼(AID): #1CZQdMsA (TOEFL_iBT)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1CZQdMsA (TOEFL_iBT)