Re: [請益] 這顆MLC的SSD算OK嗎?
※ 引述《LoveWin7 (金鶯隊是精英隊~)》之銘言:
: 廠牌:Sandisk
: 型號:SDLF1DAR-960G-1HA
: 速度:Sequential Read/Write (MB/s)** Up to 530/460 MB/s1
: Random Read/Write (IOPS) Up to 76K/14K IOPS2
: 大小:2.5吋
: 等級:MLC
: 容量:960GB
: 手邊有一顆全新工廠貨的MLC SSD,目前有在用一台四年前的筆電ASUS U41S
: 雖然是i5處理器,但是500GB HDD有時候跑的有點慢
: 如果說改裝成這顆SSD,速度會因此變快很多嗎?
: 因為這個SSD在國內很少見(國外一顆至少要賣600美金),才想問問這顆SSD的性能
: 算不算好?
CloudSpeed Eco Gen. II SATA SSD
這顆就讀取型的資料中心級SSD(像Intel DC S3500那樣),隨機寫入就稍微慢一點
但企業級產品沒人在看AS SSD這種快餐跑分的,比快餐跑分沒太大der意義
而是更在意的是高壓讀寫下的QoS和延遲
(一些消費級SSD在穩定態下的隨機4K QD32寫入表現很慘)
還有可靠度和數據完整性等(所以會有斷電保護,XOR和一堆數據校驗機制)
密集或混合寫入型有些會搭載eMLC,甚至大幅提升OP
以提升寫入的耐久度
=====================================================
至於這顆算不算好?
依照家用環境來說使用體驗和一般的SSD沒太大的差異
頂多就沒有保固會癢癢der就是惹
--
姐姐 姐姐 我們好像變成簽名檔了
雷姆,雷姆 好像真的是這麼一回事呢
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.27.164.137
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Storage_Zone/M.1473693167.A.82B.html
推
09/12 23:32, , 1F
09/12 23:32, 1F
→
09/12 23:43, , 2F
09/12 23:43, 2F
推
09/12 23:45, , 3F
09/12 23:45, 3F
→
09/12 23:46, , 4F
09/12 23:46, 4F
你可以寫信問SanDisk官方,看能不能RMA
因為我個人是通常會將散裝品當無保,這種產品要算保固通常都跟著OEM的整機走
(整台主機裝好照主機整體去算)
推
09/12 23:50, , 5F
09/12 23:50, 5F
保固問題你得自己寫信問SanDisk的客服確認,這我無法保證
RMA在消費級產品中簡單來講就是不透過代理商或通路商等方式
用戶直接和原廠聯繫,讓原廠收送(或是你出運費或自己寄)用戶的產品
然後原廠收到後再寄返修品(或新品)給用戶
推
09/12 23:54, , 6F
09/12 23:54, 6F
※ 編輯: Cubelia (114.27.164.137), 09/12/2016 23:59:36
推
09/12 23:56, , 7F
09/12 23:56, 7F
→
09/12 23:57, , 8F
09/12 23:57, 8F
→
09/12 23:59, , 9F
09/12 23:59, 9F
→
09/13 00:00, , 10F
09/13 00:00, 10F
推
09/13 00:03, , 11F
09/13 00:03, 11F
→
09/13 00:04, , 12F
09/13 00:04, 12F
→
09/13 00:04, , 13F
09/13 00:04, 13F
→
09/13 00:05, , 14F
09/13 00:05, 14F
→
09/13 00:06, , 15F
09/13 00:06, 15F
推
09/13 00:09, , 16F
09/13 00:09, 16F
→
09/13 00:10, , 17F
09/13 00:10, 17F
→
09/13 00:11, , 18F
09/13 00:11, 18F
→
09/13 00:11, , 19F
09/13 00:11, 19F
→
09/13 00:12, , 20F
09/13 00:12, 20F
推
09/13 00:13, , 21F
09/13 00:13, 21F
→
09/13 00:14, , 22F
09/13 00:14, 22F
→
09/13 00:14, , 23F
09/13 00:14, 23F
→
09/13 00:14, , 24F
09/13 00:14, 24F
→
09/13 00:15, , 25F
09/13 00:15, 25F
→
09/13 00:15, , 26F
09/13 00:15, 26F
推
09/13 00:16, , 27F
09/13 00:16, 27F
→
09/13 00:17, , 28F
09/13 00:17, 28F
→
09/13 00:17, , 29F
09/13 00:17, 29F
→
09/13 00:17, , 30F
09/13 00:17, 30F
→
09/13 00:18, , 31F
09/13 00:18, 31F
→
09/13 00:18, , 32F
09/13 00:18, 32F
Chrome很吃記憶體不是一天兩天的事惹
你實體記憶體嚴重不足開始大量動用虛擬記憶體,這樣還可以理解
也許有一咪咪改善,但還是不及直接加記憶體 反正四年前的筆電一定是DDR3
分頁開太多狂吃記憶體,要不就是分頁開少一點 不然就是多加記憶體
→
09/13 00:19, , 33F
09/13 00:19, 33F
※ 編輯: Cubelia (114.27.164.137), 09/13/2016 00:21:46
→
09/13 00:20, , 34F
09/13 00:20, 34F
→
09/13 00:21, , 35F
09/13 00:21, 35F
→
09/13 00:21, , 36F
09/13 00:21, 36F
→
09/13 00:22, , 37F
09/13 00:22, 37F
→
09/13 00:23, , 38F
09/13 00:23, 38F
→
09/13 00:23, , 39F
09/13 00:23, 39F
→
09/13 00:25, , 40F
09/13 00:25, 40F
推
09/13 00:27, , 41F
09/13 00:27, 41F
推
09/13 00:28, , 42F
09/13 00:28, 42F
→
09/13 00:29, , 43F
09/13 00:29, 43F
推
09/13 00:30, , 44F
09/13 00:30, 44F
→
09/13 00:30, , 45F
09/13 00:30, 45F
→
09/13 00:31, , 46F
09/13 00:31, 46F
→
09/13 00:32, , 47F
09/13 00:32, 47F
→
09/13 00:33, , 48F
09/13 00:33, 48F
→
09/13 00:34, , 49F
09/13 00:34, 49F
推
09/13 00:34, , 50F
09/13 00:34, 50F
→
09/13 00:35, , 51F
09/13 00:35, 51F
→
09/13 00:35, , 52F
09/13 00:35, 52F
→
09/13 00:35, , 53F
09/13 00:35, 53F
→
09/13 00:36, , 54F
09/13 00:36, 54F
→
09/13 00:37, , 55F
09/13 00:37, 55F
→
09/13 00:38, , 56F
09/13 00:38, 56F
→
09/13 00:39, , 57F
09/13 00:39, 57F
→
09/13 00:39, , 58F
09/13 00:39, 58F
→
09/13 00:40, , 59F
09/13 00:40, 59F
→
09/13 00:41, , 60F
09/13 00:41, 60F
推
09/13 02:41, , 61F
09/13 02:41, 61F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):