Re: [其他] 為什麼大家都說"萬點存股"很不好?
我以台中銀為例子好了,我這幾天才買49張(9.63元),台中銀目前看來應該是穩建
的成長,原本我也在考慮是不是該在高點買存股?連我問我弟你有持續在買定存嗎?
他說:『我正在等它跌下來』好像過萬點就是會跌變成台股的宿命了…
台中銀最高股價大約11塊左右,最低最慘跳到4塊,所以以台中銀來看這波他也沒漲到
多少,而現在要跌到4塊(我肯定大買)也很難吧…
就算真的跌到4塊那更是進補的好時機啊,真懷念3955那次…跌勢猛,漲勢也是讓人家
小心肝碰碰跳啊~~~~
反正是定存股,又不是賺價差,跌到4塊我還是照領我的股利股息啊~~~除非妳要賣才需要
看價差,金融股的特性就是總有一天會回到原來的買價,到時再脫手就好了…
而且我會選台中銀就是因為它夠便宜一個月薪水就可以買得到了,比較有成就感啦^^
但是可了誨言,在高點存股的風險肯定比低點還大,不過沒辦法啊,我們又不能回到過
去,只能等待未來,但是萬一台股真的漲到1萬2千點,那沒上車的不的搥心肝了~~~~
股票嘛…沒有一定的…今天的點數,就是今天的機會~~
祝大家不管何時,存股順利…
※ 引述《b86866631 (森森森)》之銘言:
: 隨便以一檔1730花仙子為例
: 花仙子的股價從2006年開始就一直往上爬
: 除了2008年小跌了一點點以外,其餘趨勢一直都是向上
: 速度雖然很慢,但是感覺很穩
: 而每年現金殖利率都有3~5%左右
: 填息速度也滿快的
: 仔細找一定還有更好的標的
: 說萬點存股不好的人是找不到好標的嗎?
: https://i.imgur.com/cYnUY83.jpg
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 106.105.74.41
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Stock/M.1505644948.A.F08.html
推
09/17 18:44, , 1F
09/17 18:44, 1F
→
09/17 18:46, , 2F
09/17 18:46, 2F
推
09/17 18:46, , 3F
09/17 18:46, 3F
推
09/17 18:52, , 4F
09/17 18:52, 4F
→
09/17 18:56, , 5F
09/17 18:56, 5F
→
09/17 18:56, , 6F
09/17 18:56, 6F
推
09/17 18:58, , 7F
09/17 18:58, 7F
→
09/17 18:58, , 8F
09/17 18:58, 8F
→
09/17 18:59, , 9F
09/17 18:59, 9F
推
09/17 19:00, , 10F
09/17 19:00, 10F
推
09/17 19:04, , 11F
09/17 19:04, 11F
推
09/17 19:04, , 12F
09/17 19:04, 12F
推
09/17 19:05, , 13F
09/17 19:05, 13F
推
09/17 19:06, , 14F
09/17 19:06, 14F
推
09/17 19:11, , 15F
09/17 19:11, 15F
推
09/17 19:24, , 16F
09/17 19:24, 16F
推
09/17 19:34, , 17F
09/17 19:34, 17F
噓
09/17 19:38, , 18F
09/17 19:38, 18F
噓
09/17 19:54, , 19F
09/17 19:54, 19F
→
09/17 19:55, , 20F
09/17 19:55, 20F
→
09/17 20:04, , 21F
09/17 20:04, 21F
→
09/17 20:07, , 22F
09/17 20:07, 22F
推
09/17 20:08, , 23F
09/17 20:08, 23F
推
09/17 20:16, , 24F
09/17 20:16, 24F
→
09/17 20:16, , 25F
09/17 20:16, 25F
噓
09/17 20:17, , 26F
09/17 20:17, 26F
→
09/17 20:17, , 27F
09/17 20:17, 27F
推
09/17 20:25, , 28F
09/17 20:25, 28F
推
09/17 20:37, , 29F
09/17 20:37, 29F
→
09/17 20:40, , 30F
09/17 20:40, 30F
→
09/17 20:43, , 31F
09/17 20:43, 31F
推
09/17 20:43, , 32F
09/17 20:43, 32F
推
09/17 20:49, , 33F
09/17 20:49, 33F
→
09/17 20:50, , 34F
09/17 20:50, 34F
→
09/17 20:52, , 35F
09/17 20:52, 35F
→
09/17 20:53, , 36F
09/17 20:53, 36F
噓
09/17 21:14, , 37F
09/17 21:14, 37F
→
09/17 21:15, , 38F
09/17 21:15, 38F
推
09/17 21:17, , 39F
09/17 21:17, 39F
推
09/17 21:17, , 40F
09/17 21:17, 40F
推
09/17 21:26, , 41F
09/17 21:26, 41F
→
09/17 22:05, , 42F
09/17 22:05, 42F
推
09/17 22:15, , 43F
09/17 22:15, 43F
推
09/17 22:17, , 44F
09/17 22:17, 44F
推
09/17 22:35, , 45F
09/17 22:35, 45F
→
09/17 22:39, , 46F
09/17 22:39, 46F
→
09/17 22:41, , 47F
09/17 22:41, 47F
推
09/17 22:42, , 48F
09/17 22:42, 48F
推
09/17 23:25, , 49F
09/17 23:25, 49F
→
09/17 23:25, , 50F
09/17 23:25, 50F
推
09/17 23:38, , 51F
09/17 23:38, 51F
推
09/18 00:07, , 52F
09/18 00:07, 52F
→
09/18 00:07, , 53F
09/18 00:07, 53F
→
09/18 00:08, , 54F
09/18 00:08, 54F
→
09/18 00:08, , 55F
09/18 00:08, 55F
推
09/18 00:29, , 56F
09/18 00:29, 56F
→
09/18 01:29, , 57F
09/18 01:29, 57F
推
09/18 03:58, , 58F
09/18 03:58, 58F
→
09/18 08:29, , 59F
09/18 08:29, 59F
推
09/18 10:16, , 60F
09/18 10:16, 60F
→
09/18 13:40, , 61F
09/18 13:40, 61F
→
09/18 13:41, , 62F
09/18 13:41, 62F
→
09/18 13:41, , 63F
09/18 13:41, 63F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):