[請益] 玩股票是否很像在玩某種博弈遊戲?
如題
我覺得投資股票獲利這件事情越看越像在玩某種博弈遊戲
每個想進場的股民 就像進到賭場的賭客必須先換籌碼
而這個籌碼在股市就是所謂的股票證卷
有了籌碼 玩家就能應用自己的策略去賭錢
投資高手就是那種會算牌或是能看出賭局的破綻的人
也有那種不跟別人賭 就投資長期
類似玩吃餃子老虎小賭怡情那樣
而我從各位文章的見解其實有發現
一些高手真的能找出一些賺錢獲利的策略
但每個人有每個人不同的策略 其實很難說誰的策略比較高明
但股市的複雜程度的確是比一般賭場的撲克牌或是賭大小之類的複雜得非常多
因為股市進場玩家太多 整個賭局的尺度太大
就算用超級電腦也很難看出一些普適的規律性~~~
就因為複雜程度太高 短期內大概也不可能像Alphago那樣
寫出可以在在股海必贏的投資策略的程式
我覺得股市的內涵真的比什麼物理 數學 經濟難太多了
各位也有同感嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.115.30.19
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Stock/M.1476335656.A.1D7.html
※ 編輯: lovepork (140.115.30.19), 10/13/2016 13:16:44
推
10/13 13:14, , 1F
10/13 13:14, 1F
推
10/13 13:16, , 2F
10/13 13:16, 2F
推
10/13 13:17, , 3F
10/13 13:17, 3F
→
10/13 13:17, , 4F
10/13 13:17, 4F
噓
10/13 13:19, , 5F
10/13 13:19, 5F
→
10/13 13:22, , 6F
10/13 13:22, 6F
→
10/13 13:22, , 7F
10/13 13:22, 7F
推
10/13 13:22, , 8F
10/13 13:22, 8F
推
10/13 13:23, , 9F
10/13 13:23, 9F
噓
10/13 13:24, , 10F
10/13 13:24, 10F
→
10/13 13:27, , 11F
10/13 13:27, 11F
推
10/13 13:27, , 12F
10/13 13:27, 12F
推
10/13 13:27, , 13F
10/13 13:27, 13F
推
10/13 13:27, , 14F
10/13 13:27, 14F
推
10/13 13:28, , 15F
10/13 13:28, 15F
推
10/13 13:28, , 16F
10/13 13:28, 16F
推
10/13 13:28, , 17F
10/13 13:28, 17F
推
10/13 13:28, , 18F
10/13 13:28, 18F
→
10/13 13:29, , 19F
10/13 13:29, 19F
噓
10/13 13:29, , 20F
10/13 13:29, 20F
→
10/13 13:30, , 21F
10/13 13:30, 21F
→
10/13 13:30, , 22F
10/13 13:30, 22F
推
10/13 13:32, , 23F
10/13 13:32, 23F
推
10/13 13:33, , 24F
10/13 13:33, 24F
→
10/13 13:36, , 25F
10/13 13:36, 25F
推
10/13 13:42, , 26F
10/13 13:42, 26F
→
10/13 13:42, , 27F
10/13 13:42, 27F
→
10/13 13:42, , 28F
10/13 13:42, 28F
推
10/13 13:43, , 29F
10/13 13:43, 29F
推
10/13 13:44, , 30F
10/13 13:44, 30F
→
10/13 13:46, , 31F
10/13 13:46, 31F
→
10/13 13:47, , 32F
10/13 13:47, 32F
噓
10/13 13:49, , 33F
10/13 13:49, 33F
推
10/13 13:51, , 34F
10/13 13:51, 34F
推
10/13 13:53, , 35F
10/13 13:53, 35F
推
10/13 13:54, , 36F
10/13 13:54, 36F
→
10/13 13:56, , 37F
10/13 13:56, 37F
→
10/13 13:59, , 38F
10/13 13:59, 38F
推
10/13 13:59, , 39F
10/13 13:59, 39F
→
10/13 14:17, , 40F
10/13 14:17, 40F
推
10/13 14:26, , 41F
10/13 14:26, 41F
推
10/13 14:30, , 42F
10/13 14:30, 42F
→
10/13 14:33, , 43F
10/13 14:33, 43F
推
10/13 14:35, , 44F
10/13 14:35, 44F
→
10/13 14:43, , 45F
10/13 14:43, 45F
推
10/13 14:49, , 46F
10/13 14:49, 46F
→
10/13 14:51, , 47F
10/13 14:51, 47F
噓
10/13 14:52, , 48F
10/13 14:52, 48F
推
10/13 14:55, , 49F
10/13 14:55, 49F
→
10/13 15:02, , 50F
10/13 15:02, 50F
推
10/13 15:08, , 51F
10/13 15:08, 51F
推
10/13 15:10, , 52F
10/13 15:10, 52F
→
10/13 15:15, , 53F
10/13 15:15, 53F
推
10/13 15:19, , 54F
10/13 15:19, 54F
推
10/13 15:22, , 55F
10/13 15:22, 55F
噓
10/13 15:22, , 56F
10/13 15:22, 56F
推
10/13 15:47, , 57F
10/13 15:47, 57F
→
10/13 15:47, , 58F
10/13 15:47, 58F
→
10/13 15:53, , 59F
10/13 15:53, 59F
推
10/13 17:23, , 60F
10/13 17:23, 60F
推
10/13 17:26, , 61F
10/13 17:26, 61F
推
10/13 17:36, , 62F
10/13 17:36, 62F
→
10/13 17:39, , 63F
10/13 17:39, 63F
推
10/13 17:47, , 64F
10/13 17:47, 64F
→
10/13 17:48, , 65F
10/13 17:48, 65F
推
10/13 17:56, , 66F
10/13 17:56, 66F
推
10/13 19:14, , 67F
10/13 19:14, 67F
推
10/13 19:16, , 68F
10/13 19:16, 68F
推
10/13 19:39, , 69F
10/13 19:39, 69F
→
10/13 19:39, , 70F
10/13 19:39, 70F
推
10/13 21:18, , 71F
10/13 21:18, 71F
推
10/13 21:23, , 72F
10/13 21:23, 72F
推
10/13 21:44, , 73F
10/13 21:44, 73F
→
10/13 21:44, , 74F
10/13 21:44, 74F
噓
10/13 22:06, , 75F
10/13 22:06, 75F
噓
10/14 09:28, , 76F
10/14 09:28, 76F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):