[新聞] 政策逆轉 立院藍黨團決議廢證所稅
1.原文連結(必須檢附):
http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/politics/20151113/731849/
2.原文內容:
政策逆轉 立院藍黨團決議廢證所稅
2015年11月13日10:37 國民黨立委羅明才今天在立院受訪證實,國民黨立院黨團上午決議
廢除證所稅。國民黨政策會執行長賴士葆會後受訪表示,大方向廢掉證所稅,稍後朝野協
商在本文內加一句話「證交稅內含證所稅」,至於千分之0.5或千分之2.5放在說明欄。他
事先有跟院長談過類似概念,基本上可以接受,這樣協商很快會有結果,他認為證所稅廢
除與否是各自解讀,認為廢掉就廢掉,不認為廢掉就不是廢掉。
據了解,與會藍委29人,超過一半以上人在表決時支持廢除證所稅。金管會主委曾銘宗受
訪強調,希望立法院盡快取得共識,完成三讀,讓爭議盡快消除。針對與會的財政部長張
盛和的看法?藍委羅明才說,部長也同意,通過了,就往前看。
民進黨立院黨團總召柯建銘上午進行朝野協商前表示,證所稅現在的版本是為了證所稅而
證所稅,且在國民黨內,馬一個態度、朱一個態度、洪一個態度,黨團也一個態度,期盼
待國民黨內部先整合好再來談,民進黨也希望能夠處理就趕快處理。日前洪秀柱的證所稅
版本,本來是為了選舉而提出的,現在洪秀柱已經不選了,且連國民黨主席朱立倫都在反
對;又,民進黨團從以前到現在就始終反對馬英九的錯誤版本,況且證所稅爭議已造成股
市蒸發三兆元,這是非常嚴重的問題。
柯建銘指出,證所稅爭議中關於千分之0.5要核實課稅的部分,反而會造成稅損,且現在
就連後台作業都無法處理核實課稅,因為太複雜、稽徵成本根本太高,最重要是,來不
及實施。柯呼籲,現在最重要是國民黨內部,請國民黨先整合好再談
(陳培煌、林靖堂/台北報導)
3.心得/評論(必需填寫):
衝阿 ptt股板大軍
不知道還會不會衝高
還是往...
--
推 godtomanne:alt+f4沒有用? 9/10 00:18
→ alt:去你媽的 9/10 00:24
噓 F4:你才沒用 9/10 00:25
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.241.44.180
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Stock/M.1447382885.A.892.html
→
11/13 10:50, , 1F
11/13 10:50, 1F
推
11/13 10:50, , 2F
11/13 10:50, 2F
→
11/13 10:51, , 3F
11/13 10:51, 3F
推
11/13 10:52, , 4F
11/13 10:52, 4F
→
11/13 10:53, , 5F
11/13 10:53, 5F
→
11/13 10:53, , 6F
11/13 10:53, 6F
→
11/13 10:53, , 7F
11/13 10:53, 7F
推
11/13 10:54, , 8F
11/13 10:54, 8F
推
11/13 10:54, , 9F
11/13 10:54, 9F
噓
11/13 10:55, , 10F
11/13 10:55, 10F
噓
11/13 10:56, , 11F
11/13 10:56, 11F
推
11/13 10:56, , 12F
11/13 10:56, 12F
推
11/13 10:57, , 13F
11/13 10:57, 13F
噓
11/13 10:58, , 14F
11/13 10:58, 14F
推
11/13 10:59, , 15F
11/13 10:59, 15F
→
11/13 10:59, , 16F
11/13 10:59, 16F
→
11/13 10:59, , 17F
11/13 10:59, 17F
→
11/13 10:59, , 18F
11/13 10:59, 18F
→
11/13 11:01, , 19F
11/13 11:01, 19F
噓
11/13 11:02, , 20F
11/13 11:02, 20F
推
11/13 11:03, , 21F
11/13 11:03, 21F
→
11/13 11:03, , 22F
11/13 11:03, 22F
推
11/13 11:03, , 23F
11/13 11:03, 23F
推
11/13 11:04, , 24F
11/13 11:04, 24F
推
11/13 11:07, , 25F
11/13 11:07, 25F
推
11/13 11:08, , 26F
11/13 11:08, 26F
→
11/13 11:08, , 27F
11/13 11:08, 27F
→
11/13 11:09, , 28F
11/13 11:09, 28F
→
11/13 11:16, , 29F
11/13 11:16, 29F
推
11/13 11:19, , 30F
11/13 11:19, 30F
推
11/13 11:24, , 31F
11/13 11:24, 31F
→
11/13 11:24, , 32F
11/13 11:24, 32F
→
11/13 11:25, , 33F
11/13 11:25, 33F
→
11/13 11:26, , 34F
11/13 11:26, 34F
→
11/13 11:27, , 35F
11/13 11:27, 35F
推
11/13 11:30, , 36F
11/13 11:30, 36F
→
11/13 11:34, , 37F
11/13 11:34, 37F
→
11/13 11:36, , 38F
11/13 11:36, 38F
推
11/13 11:38, , 39F
11/13 11:38, 39F
推
11/13 11:49, , 40F
11/13 11:49, 40F
推
11/13 11:49, , 41F
11/13 11:49, 41F
推
11/13 11:50, , 42F
11/13 11:50, 42F
→
11/13 11:50, , 43F
11/13 11:50, 43F
噓
11/13 11:51, , 44F
11/13 11:51, 44F
噓
11/13 12:12, , 45F
11/13 12:12, 45F
→
11/13 12:15, , 46F
11/13 12:15, 46F
噓
11/13 12:19, , 47F
11/13 12:19, 47F
噓
11/13 12:23, , 48F
11/13 12:23, 48F
噓
11/13 12:30, , 49F
11/13 12:30, 49F
推
11/13 12:52, , 50F
11/13 12:52, 50F
噓
11/13 13:26, , 51F
11/13 13:26, 51F
噓
11/13 13:42, , 52F
11/13 13:42, 52F
→
11/13 13:42, , 53F
11/13 13:42, 53F
噓
11/13 13:44, , 54F
11/13 13:44, 54F
推
11/13 13:49, , 55F
11/13 13:49, 55F
噓
11/13 13:53, , 56F
11/13 13:53, 56F
噓
11/14 00:50, , 57F
11/14 00:50, 57F
推
11/14 08:36, , 58F
11/14 08:36, 58F
推
11/15 07:43, , 59F
11/15 07:43, 59F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):