Re: [標的] 百略4103(代femlro po)
原文全刪
百略低點25元漲到前高97元後,回跌至65元左右(是40元漲到97的1/2處),在低
檔65-70元不介紹它,而在高檔接近90才介紹,不是人人都會搶短線跑得快跑得妙。
您操作股票七年以上,理應知在高檔的風險,本就不該隨便公開介紹,因為一定
會害到他人不是住套房就是慘賠出場。
我是以技術為主籌碼為輔觀盤,現在看此檔線型雖是事後諸葛,但從25元漲到97
元,是幾倍了,不是檔檔如大立光一飛到外太空(之前之勢,現也長空格局中),您雖好心
公開分享看法及推薦,但卻害到人賠錢是事實,您如真能得到教訓,望爾後小心公開分享
,必竟眾多散戶是盲目的。
從大盤過了8千5,我都跟周邊朋友不要買股票了,等下次長線多頭來臨再入市,
魚頭魚尾給別人享用去吧(魚身理論);所以愛搶反彈的鄉民們,手腳不夠快的,保留現金
為上,待見低點,全市場都嚇怕時,屆時您就可安心入市放口袋等獲利。
p.s.不好意思,又多言了,還請各位及原po者見諒,我續淺水看表演。
--
Sent from my Android
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 39.13.195.234
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Stock/M.1443718220.A.936.html
推
10/02 00:53, , 1F
10/02 00:53, 1F
推
10/02 00:53, , 2F
10/02 00:53, 2F
→
10/02 00:54, , 3F
10/02 00:54, 3F
噓
10/02 00:54, , 4F
10/02 00:54, 4F
推
10/02 00:57, , 5F
10/02 00:57, 5F
推
10/02 00:57, , 6F
10/02 00:57, 6F
→
10/02 00:57, , 7F
10/02 00:57, 7F
您說的沒錯,但何必天天觀盤擔心呢。
→
10/02 00:57, , 8F
10/02 00:57, 8F
→
10/02 00:57, , 9F
10/02 00:57, 9F
※ 編輯: eaglechu (39.13.195.234), 10/02/2015 00:59:58
→
10/02 00:58, , 10F
10/02 00:58, 10F
80元介紹的,請問從25元漲到80是幾倍了,是低檔還是高檔呢。
※ 編輯: eaglechu (39.13.195.234), 10/02/2015 01:02:52
噓
10/02 01:00, , 11F
10/02 01:00, 11F
噓
10/02 01:04, , 12F
10/02 01:04, 12F
→
10/02 01:06, , 13F
10/02 01:06, 13F
→
10/02 01:07, , 14F
10/02 01:07, 14F
文中有說,散戶是盲目的依散戶心理,當看到此檔推薦文只會先注意並不會立即買,都是
漲上去才追,等追到之後也套到,試問有多少人會立即跟單呢?又有多少人會善設停損呢
?如散戶都做得到,請問那些操盤手要吃啥呢?
※ 編輯: eaglechu (39.13.195.234), 10/02/2015 01:16:57
→
10/02 01:14, , 15F
10/02 01:14, 15F
噓
10/02 01:16, , 16F
10/02 01:16, 16F
看來擁護者不少,對不起了,在這向您們致上二十萬分歉意,真不該太多言,抱歉了。
※ 編輯: eaglechu (39.13.195.234), 10/02/2015 01:20:50
噓
10/02 01:18, , 17F
10/02 01:18, 17F
→
10/02 01:20, , 18F
10/02 01:20, 18F
→
10/02 01:20, , 19F
10/02 01:20, 19F
→
10/02 01:20, , 20F
10/02 01:20, 20F
→
10/02 01:21, , 21F
10/02 01:21, 21F
推
10/02 01:23, , 22F
10/02 01:23, 22F
→
10/02 01:25, , 23F
10/02 01:25, 23F
→
10/02 01:35, , 24F
10/02 01:35, 24F
→
10/02 01:36, , 25F
10/02 01:36, 25F
→
10/02 01:37, , 26F
10/02 01:37, 26F
→
10/02 01:37, , 27F
10/02 01:37, 27F
→
10/02 01:38, , 28F
10/02 01:38, 28F
推
10/02 02:03, , 29F
10/02 02:03, 29F
推
10/02 06:09, , 30F
10/02 06:09, 30F
→
10/02 06:09, , 31F
10/02 06:09, 31F
→
10/02 06:11, , 32F
10/02 06:11, 32F
噓
10/02 06:19, , 33F
10/02 06:19, 33F
→
10/02 06:20, , 34F
10/02 06:20, 34F
→
10/02 06:31, , 35F
10/02 06:31, 35F
噓
10/02 07:48, , 36F
10/02 07:48, 36F
→
10/02 09:15, , 37F
10/02 09:15, 37F
推
10/02 10:14, , 38F
10/02 10:14, 38F
→
10/02 10:57, , 39F
10/02 10:57, 39F
噓
10/02 12:19, , 40F
10/02 12:19, 40F
噓
10/02 12:49, , 41F
10/02 12:49, 41F
推
10/02 14:53, , 42F
10/02 14:53, 42F
推
10/02 14:54, , 43F
10/02 14:54, 43F
推
10/02 14:57, , 44F
10/02 14:57, 44F
推
10/02 16:34, , 45F
10/02 16:34, 45F
→
10/02 16:34, , 46F
10/02 16:34, 46F
→
10/02 16:35, , 47F
10/02 16:35, 47F
→
10/02 16:46, , 48F
10/02 16:46, 48F
→
10/02 16:46, , 49F
10/02 16:46, 49F
→
10/02 16:47, , 50F
10/02 16:47, 50F
→
10/02 16:48, , 51F
10/02 16:48, 51F
→
10/02 16:49, , 52F
10/02 16:49, 52F
噓
10/02 23:04, , 53F
10/02 23:04, 53F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 4 篇):