Re: [新聞] 展訊放話 5年內打敗聯發科
※ 引述《tetsuro (狂悲狂喜)》之銘言:
: 展訊放話 5年內打敗聯發科
: 2015-09-14
: 〔記者卓怡君/台北報導〕過去聯發科(2454)的頭號勁敵是美國高通,但現在讓聯發科
: 如坐針氈的卻是中國展訊,有錢就是任性的展訊比高通更難對付,展訊除了有中國國家隊
: 紫光集團強力扶植,還有英特爾技術加持,今年迅速竄起,紫光集團董事長趙偉國放話,
: 5年投資300億人民幣,展訊一定要超越聯發科。
: 展訊手中握有高達300億人民幣奧援,鎖定聯發科展開殊死戰,除了挖角聯發科大將袁帝
: 文之外,更扮演價格破壞者,祭出破壞行情的割喉削價,展訊3G同等級晶片硬是比聯發科
: 便宜3到4成,不惜以個位數的毛利率搶攻聯發科市佔率,目前展訊已拿走2到3成市佔率,
: 聯發科上半年的獲利因價格競爭幾乎腰斬,展訊放話就算是賠錢,也要把聯發科趕出新興
: 市場。
這段話說明三件事:
1. 展訊對自己缺乏信心
依照大陸人的文化,應當要放話打敗大哥高通,豈有把目標放在老二的位置?
況且國家隊已經花這麼多錢燒這麼多年
2. 紫光集團對展訊缺乏信心
身為集團董事長,理當喊出市佔率成長三倍,獲利成長五倍這種豪語,
結果竟然說出要"賠錢"對抗聯發科這種丟人現眼的話!?
試問如果你是投資人,願意繼續投資這種董事長只想著賠錢的公司?
如果你是大陸的頂尖人才,願把自己青春投入這種董事長只想著賠錢的公司?
3.五年300億人民幣很多嗎?
300億人民幣是甚麼概念? 就不過1500億,大約就是一年300億台幣
聯發科剛剛併購立錡也只花了不到300億,
聯發科去年的合併營收是2000億,純益463億,
光是員工分紅就提撥了92億
五年300億玩得起什麼?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.137.96.32
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Stock/M.1442303497.A.443.html
→
09/15 16:00, , 1F
09/15 16:00, 1F
推
09/15 16:02, , 2F
09/15 16:02, 2F
推
09/15 16:04, , 3F
09/15 16:04, 3F
→
09/15 16:04, , 4F
09/15 16:04, 4F
推
09/15 16:04, , 5F
09/15 16:04, 5F
→
09/15 16:04, , 6F
09/15 16:04, 6F
噓
09/15 16:05, , 7F
09/15 16:05, 7F
→
09/15 16:05, , 8F
09/15 16:05, 8F
→
09/15 16:05, , 9F
09/15 16:05, 9F
→
09/15 16:06, , 10F
09/15 16:06, 10F
→
09/15 16:06, , 11F
09/15 16:06, 11F
噓
09/15 16:06, , 12F
09/15 16:06, 12F
→
09/15 16:06, , 13F
09/15 16:06, 13F
→
09/15 16:06, , 14F
09/15 16:06, 14F
→
09/15 16:07, , 15F
09/15 16:07, 15F
→
09/15 16:07, , 16F
09/15 16:07, 16F
→
09/15 16:07, , 17F
09/15 16:07, 17F
噓
09/15 16:08, , 18F
09/15 16:08, 18F
→
09/15 16:08, , 19F
09/15 16:08, 19F
→
09/15 16:09, , 20F
09/15 16:09, 20F
→
09/15 16:09, , 21F
09/15 16:09, 21F
→
09/15 16:10, , 22F
09/15 16:10, 22F
→
09/15 16:11, , 23F
09/15 16:11, 23F
→
09/15 16:14, , 24F
09/15 16:14, 24F
→
09/15 16:14, , 25F
09/15 16:14, 25F
推
09/15 16:32, , 26F
09/15 16:32, 26F
→
09/15 16:33, , 27F
09/15 16:33, 27F
→
09/15 16:35, , 28F
09/15 16:35, 28F
推
09/15 16:40, , 29F
09/15 16:40, 29F
→
09/15 16:40, , 30F
09/15 16:40, 30F
推
09/15 16:42, , 31F
09/15 16:42, 31F
→
09/15 16:42, , 32F
09/15 16:42, 32F
推
09/15 16:43, , 33F
09/15 16:43, 33F
→
09/15 16:44, , 34F
09/15 16:44, 34F
推
09/15 16:47, , 35F
09/15 16:47, 35F
→
09/15 16:47, , 36F
09/15 16:47, 36F
推
09/15 16:50, , 37F
09/15 16:50, 37F
→
09/15 16:57, , 38F
09/15 16:57, 38F
→
09/15 17:02, , 39F
09/15 17:02, 39F
→
09/15 17:02, , 40F
09/15 17:02, 40F
→
09/15 17:02, , 41F
09/15 17:02, 41F
→
09/15 17:03, , 42F
09/15 17:03, 42F
推
09/15 17:03, , 43F
09/15 17:03, 43F
→
09/15 17:03, , 44F
09/15 17:03, 44F
推
09/15 17:11, , 45F
09/15 17:11, 45F
→
09/15 17:12, , 46F
09/15 17:12, 46F
→
09/15 17:13, , 47F
09/15 17:13, 47F
→
09/15 17:15, , 48F
09/15 17:15, 48F
→
09/15 17:17, , 49F
09/15 17:17, 49F
→
09/15 17:18, , 50F
09/15 17:18, 50F
→
09/15 17:18, , 51F
09/15 17:18, 51F
推
09/15 17:19, , 52F
09/15 17:19, 52F
→
09/15 17:20, , 53F
09/15 17:20, 53F
→
09/15 17:21, , 54F
09/15 17:21, 54F
→
09/15 17:21, , 55F
09/15 17:21, 55F
→
09/15 17:23, , 56F
09/15 17:23, 56F
→
09/15 17:23, , 57F
09/15 17:23, 57F
→
09/15 17:24, , 58F
09/15 17:24, 58F
→
09/15 17:24, , 59F
09/15 17:24, 59F
推
09/15 17:27, , 60F
09/15 17:27, 60F
→
09/15 17:28, , 61F
09/15 17:28, 61F
→
09/15 17:28, , 62F
09/15 17:28, 62F
推
09/15 17:32, , 63F
09/15 17:32, 63F
噓
09/15 17:33, , 64F
09/15 17:33, 64F
→
09/15 17:39, , 65F
09/15 17:39, 65F
→
09/15 17:39, , 66F
09/15 17:39, 66F
噓
09/15 17:46, , 67F
09/15 17:46, 67F
噓
09/15 17:47, , 68F
09/15 17:47, 68F
推
09/15 17:54, , 69F
09/15 17:54, 69F
→
09/15 17:54, , 70F
09/15 17:54, 70F
→
09/15 18:17, , 71F
09/15 18:17, 71F
推
09/15 18:38, , 72F
09/15 18:38, 72F
→
09/15 18:38, , 73F
09/15 18:38, 73F
推
09/15 19:42, , 74F
09/15 19:42, 74F
→
09/15 19:43, , 75F
09/15 19:43, 75F
→
09/15 20:01, , 76F
09/15 20:01, 76F
噓
09/15 21:02, , 77F
09/15 21:02, 77F
推
09/15 21:55, , 78F
09/15 21:55, 78F
推
09/16 08:42, , 79F
09/16 08:42, 79F
討論串 (同標題文章)