[請益] 全世界一起貨幣爆發尬得贏美國嗎?
現在的狀況好像是老美狂印鈔票搜刮完全世界資源
也把全世界的經濟搞慘了以後
開始經濟復甦 所以要升息收資金了
這樣的情況在2008年金融海嘯與現在正好相反
那時候是美國垮了 美元狂貶 亞幣歐元狂漲
全世界正邁向恢復或成長穩定
結果美國為了拯救崩潰的國內經濟
連續6年的大量釋放貨幣 目前看來是最後的得利者
全世界比較老手的央行 例如中國 歐洲 日本
似乎察覺不大對勁了 所以可以陸續看到 QE接棒或降息降準!!
就連穩定物價為主的彭總 竟然也變相的增加貨幣流動
但想請教的是
美國升息收回資金的力道比較強
還是全球一起狂印貨幣的力道比較強
是不是現在才是貨幣戰爭的第一幕揭開呢??
我的想法是 美國勢必是要升息了
但是被搶奪後的其他國家勢必要反制資金被抽走的恐怖後遺症 就是通縮大衰退
目前看起來是 美國獨強 世界其他都弱
所以做法上應該是 美國會收資金 但其他國家會瘋狂地補上離開的資金
在這樣的互相飆速對尬的情況下(我認為時速已經到達GTA的程度了)
究竟是美國會贏 還是世界聯軍會贏
大家意見如何??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.69.71.67
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Stock/M.1442149940.A.79C.html
推
09/13 21:16, , 1F
09/13 21:16, 1F
推
09/13 21:17, , 2F
09/13 21:17, 2F
推
09/13 21:17, , 3F
09/13 21:17, 3F
→
09/13 21:17, , 4F
09/13 21:17, 4F
推
09/13 21:18, , 5F
09/13 21:18, 5F
→
09/13 21:21, , 6F
09/13 21:21, 6F
噓
09/13 21:27, , 7F
09/13 21:27, 7F
推
09/13 21:28, , 8F
09/13 21:28, 8F
推
09/13 21:30, , 9F
09/13 21:30, 9F
→
09/13 21:32, , 10F
09/13 21:32, 10F
推
09/13 21:32, , 11F
09/13 21:32, 11F
推
09/13 21:33, , 12F
09/13 21:33, 12F
→
09/13 21:34, , 13F
09/13 21:34, 13F
→
09/13 21:34, , 14F
09/13 21:34, 14F
推
09/13 21:35, , 15F
09/13 21:35, 15F
推
09/13 21:38, , 16F
09/13 21:38, 16F
推
09/13 21:38, , 17F
09/13 21:38, 17F
→
09/13 21:39, , 18F
09/13 21:39, 18F
→
09/13 21:39, , 19F
09/13 21:39, 19F
→
09/13 21:40, , 20F
09/13 21:40, 20F
→
09/13 21:40, , 21F
09/13 21:40, 21F
→
09/13 21:40, , 22F
09/13 21:40, 22F
→
09/13 21:41, , 23F
09/13 21:41, 23F
→
09/13 21:41, , 24F
09/13 21:41, 24F
→
09/13 21:42, , 25F
09/13 21:42, 25F
→
09/13 21:50, , 26F
09/13 21:50, 26F
→
09/13 21:50, , 27F
09/13 21:50, 27F
噓
09/13 21:55, , 28F
09/13 21:55, 28F
推
09/13 21:57, , 29F
09/13 21:57, 29F
→
09/13 21:59, , 30F
09/13 21:59, 30F
噓
09/13 21:59, , 31F
09/13 21:59, 31F
→
09/13 21:59, , 32F
09/13 21:59, 32F
→
09/13 22:07, , 33F
09/13 22:07, 33F
推
09/13 22:08, , 34F
09/13 22:08, 34F
→
09/13 22:12, , 35F
09/13 22:12, 35F
推
09/13 22:12, , 36F
09/13 22:12, 36F
推
09/13 22:34, , 37F
09/13 22:34, 37F
推
09/13 22:45, , 38F
09/13 22:45, 38F
→
09/13 22:55, , 39F
09/13 22:55, 39F
→
09/13 23:05, , 40F
09/13 23:05, 40F
推
09/14 00:25, , 41F
09/14 00:25, 41F
推
09/14 00:46, , 42F
09/14 00:46, 42F
→
09/14 00:46, , 43F
09/14 00:46, 43F
→
09/14 00:46, , 44F
09/14 00:46, 44F
→
09/14 00:47, , 45F
09/14 00:47, 45F
推
09/14 01:44, , 46F
09/14 01:44, 46F
推
09/14 06:04, , 47F
09/14 06:04, 47F
→
09/14 06:05, , 48F
09/14 06:05, 48F
推
09/14 08:15, , 49F
09/14 08:15, 49F
→
09/14 08:17, , 50F
09/14 08:17, 50F
推
09/14 09:10, , 51F
09/14 09:10, 51F
→
09/14 09:10, , 52F
09/14 09:10, 52F
推
09/14 09:20, , 53F
09/14 09:20, 53F
→
09/14 09:21, , 54F
09/14 09:21, 54F
→
09/14 09:21, , 55F
09/14 09:21, 55F
→
09/14 09:38, , 56F
09/14 09:38, 56F
推
09/14 13:03, , 57F
09/14 13:03, 57F
推
09/14 13:32, , 58F
09/14 13:32, 58F
推
09/14 14:15, , 59F
09/14 14:15, 59F
推
09/14 14:21, , 60F
09/14 14:21, 60F
推
09/14 14:55, , 61F
09/14 14:55, 61F
→
09/14 14:56, , 62F
09/14 14:56, 62F
推
09/14 14:58, , 63F
09/14 14:58, 63F
推
09/14 17:48, , 64F
09/14 17:48, 64F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):