Fw: [新聞] 絕地求生開發者抨擊要塞英雄為複製品
《絕地求生》開發者抨擊《要塞英雄》,稱之為"複製品"。
https://home.gamer.com.tw/creationDetail.php?sn=3731183
在9月初時,遊戲開發商 Epic Games發表了旗下遊戲《要塞英雄》將加入Battle
Royale(大逃殺)模式,結果這項舉動似乎導致其他大逃殺類型遊戲的開發商不滿。
在今早的一個新聞稿中,《絕地求生》開發商藍洞工作室對Epic Games做出了攻擊,宣
稱《要塞英雄》的Battle Royale(大逃殺)模式根本是複製品。
"我們與Epic Games有著持續交流的關係,因為他們是我們遊戲的引擎(Unreal Engine
4)製作者" 藍洞工作室副總裁Chang Han Kim說道,"在聽取持續增加的玩家意見和仔細檢
驗遊戲內容後,"我們認為《絕地求生》複製了《絕地求生》的遊戲經驗"。
接著他又提到 "我們注意到Epic Games 在宣傳《要塞英雄》有提到《絕地求生》,但
卻又沒有跟我們討論,我們認為是很不恰當的。"
Epic Games創意總監Donald Mustard在PlayStation Blog有提到他們很喜愛《絕地求生》
等大逃殺類型的遊戲,而想要做出自己的版本。
Chang Han Kim最後還提到,他和藍洞工作室考慮採取進一步的行動。
====
大逃殺玩法要類似到什麼程度才算抄襲呀!
--
It is difficult to communicate a life with words.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.170.166.114
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1506212579.A.1A9.html
※ 編輯: wizardfizban (1.170.166.114), 09/24/2017 08:23:19
推
09/24 08:27, , 1F
09/24 08:27, 1F
推
09/24 08:27, , 2F
09/24 08:27, 2F
推
09/24 08:28, , 3F
09/24 08:28, 3F
→
09/24 08:29, , 4F
09/24 08:29, 4F
推
09/24 08:38, , 5F
09/24 08:38, 5F
→
09/24 08:38, , 6F
09/24 08:38, 6F
推
09/24 08:39, , 7F
09/24 08:39, 7F
推
09/24 08:39, , 8F
09/24 08:39, 8F
→
09/24 08:50, , 9F
09/24 08:50, 9F
推
09/24 08:51, , 10F
09/24 08:51, 10F
推
09/24 08:54, , 11F
09/24 08:54, 11F
推
09/24 09:21, , 12F
09/24 09:21, 12F
推
09/24 09:22, , 13F
09/24 09:22, 13F
→
09/24 09:31, , 14F
09/24 09:31, 14F
→
09/24 09:32, , 15F
09/24 09:32, 15F
→
09/24 09:37, , 16F
09/24 09:37, 16F
推
09/24 09:56, , 17F
09/24 09:56, 17F
→
09/24 09:58, , 18F
09/24 09:58, 18F
推
09/24 10:14, , 19F
09/24 10:14, 19F
→
09/24 10:14, , 20F
09/24 10:14, 20F
噓
09/24 10:14, , 21F
09/24 10:14, 21F
→
09/24 10:15, , 22F
09/24 10:15, 22F
推
09/24 10:16, , 23F
09/24 10:16, 23F
→
09/24 10:16, , 24F
09/24 10:16, 24F
推
09/24 10:26, , 25F
09/24 10:26, 25F
→
09/24 10:26, , 26F
09/24 10:26, 26F
推
09/24 10:30, , 27F
09/24 10:30, 27F
噓
09/24 10:47, , 28F
09/24 10:47, 28F
推
09/24 10:58, , 29F
09/24 10:58, 29F
推
09/24 11:21, , 30F
09/24 11:21, 30F
推
09/24 11:24, , 31F
09/24 11:24, 31F
推
09/24 11:27, , 32F
09/24 11:27, 32F
推
09/24 11:31, , 33F
09/24 11:31, 33F
→
09/24 11:35, , 34F
09/24 11:35, 34F
推
09/24 12:00, , 35F
09/24 12:00, 35F
→
09/24 12:01, , 36F
09/24 12:01, 36F
→
09/24 12:15, , 37F
09/24 12:15, 37F
推
09/24 12:17, , 38F
09/24 12:17, 38F
→
09/24 12:17, , 39F
09/24 12:17, 39F
噓
09/24 12:21, , 40F
09/24 12:21, 40F
推
09/24 12:23, , 41F
09/24 12:23, 41F
推
09/24 13:15, , 42F
09/24 13:15, 42F
噓
09/24 14:02, , 43F
09/24 14:02, 43F
→
09/24 15:03, , 44F
09/24 15:03, 44F
噓
09/24 15:15, , 45F
09/24 15:15, 45F
→
09/24 16:08, , 46F
09/24 16:08, 46F
推
09/24 17:53, , 47F
09/24 17:53, 47F
推
09/24 17:54, , 48F
09/24 17:54, 48F
推
09/24 18:40, , 49F
09/24 18:40, 49F
噓
09/24 19:47, , 50F
09/24 19:47, 50F
噓
09/24 23:08, , 51F
09/24 23:08, 51F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):