[問題] ZVT為何百生獸出場率這麼低
小弟只是美服3V3黃金T 偶爾會打1V1也喜歡看比賽
但是對於ZVT 百生獸出場率這麼低 而Z民又一再批評T詭雷IMBA有一些疑問
這兩個單位有點相像
一樣是二階兵種 (但人類詭雷會比較早出)
花費上 百生真的有點貴 (200 100)
詭雷只要(75 25)
不過百生攻擊頻率比較高
詭雷就是要40秒才能硬一次 範圍1.75 (目前測試圖降到1.5)
我看大部分的直播或是賽事都是用異化蟲 一隻一隻拉過來 慢慢消耗詭雷
(如果Z想偷懶一點就是炸到臉上了)
然後再配眼蟲跟主力部隊來掃雷 這樣勞民傷財又浪費手速
為啥不用一樣免洗的百生獸蝗蟲來撞呢?
應該也不用多隻 大概2~3隻就能幫忙清雷 很省手速
像我玩人類 (抱歉 我目前只會用人類)
我會再蟲族到我家門口這一段路上 都會埋雷
1. 為了拖延進擊的蟲族時間
2. 讓蟲族心有顧慮不敢直接A(像是會戰打輸 蟲族會比較不敢直接衝)
3. 偵察
以上這些情況 其實百生就能讓人類的詭雷能力大減
我只是不懂 為啥實戰中百生出場率這麼低....
我打對戰都遇過百生破雷陣 或是地道蟲來破解雷陣
其實都滿有效的
難道是因為高手都不用百生嘛?@@
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 1.169.169.32
推
10/05 22:31, , 1F
10/05 22:31, 1F
→
10/05 22:32, , 2F
10/05 22:32, 2F
→
10/05 22:33, , 3F
10/05 22:33, 3F
推
10/05 22:33, , 4F
10/05 22:33, 4F
→
10/05 22:34, , 5F
10/05 22:34, 5F
推
10/05 22:35, , 6F
10/05 22:35, 6F
→
10/05 22:35, , 7F
10/05 22:35, 7F
推
10/05 22:37, , 8F
10/05 22:37, 8F
推
10/05 22:39, , 9F
10/05 22:39, 9F
→
10/05 22:39, , 10F
10/05 22:39, 10F
→
10/05 22:39, , 11F
10/05 22:39, 11F
→
10/05 22:40, , 12F
10/05 22:40, 12F
→
10/05 22:40, , 13F
10/05 22:40, 13F
噓
10/05 22:40, , 14F
10/05 22:40, 14F
→
10/05 22:40, , 15F
10/05 22:40, 15F
→
10/05 22:40, , 16F
10/05 22:40, 16F
→
10/05 22:40, , 17F
10/05 22:40, 17F
→
10/05 22:40, , 18F
10/05 22:40, 18F
→
10/05 22:40, , 19F
10/05 22:40, 19F
推
10/05 22:40, , 20F
10/05 22:40, 20F
→
10/05 22:41, , 21F
10/05 22:41, 21F
推
10/05 22:41, , 22F
10/05 22:41, 22F
→
10/05 22:41, , 23F
10/05 22:41, 23F
→
10/05 22:41, , 24F
10/05 22:41, 24F
噓
10/05 22:41, , 25F
10/05 22:41, 25F
→
10/05 22:41, , 26F
10/05 22:41, 26F
→
10/05 22:41, , 27F
10/05 22:41, 27F
→
10/05 22:42, , 28F
10/05 22:42, 28F
推
10/05 22:42, , 29F
10/05 22:42, 29F
推
10/05 22:42, , 30F
10/05 22:42, 30F
→
10/05 22:42, , 31F
10/05 22:42, 31F
→
10/05 22:44, , 32F
10/05 22:44, 32F
→
10/05 22:44, , 33F
10/05 22:44, 33F
→
10/05 22:45, , 34F
10/05 22:45, 34F
→
10/05 22:45, , 35F
10/05 22:45, 35F
→
10/05 22:46, , 36F
10/05 22:46, 36F
→
10/05 22:46, , 37F
10/05 22:46, 37F
推
10/05 22:48, , 38F
10/05 22:48, 38F
→
10/05 22:48, , 39F
10/05 22:48, 39F
還有 65 則推文
→
10/05 23:14, , 105F
10/05 23:14, 105F
推
10/05 23:14, , 106F
10/05 23:14, 106F
→
10/05 23:14, , 107F
10/05 23:14, 107F
→
10/05 23:16, , 108F
10/05 23:16, 108F
推
10/05 23:16, , 109F
10/05 23:16, 109F
推
10/05 23:16, , 110F
10/05 23:16, 110F
→
10/05 23:17, , 111F
10/05 23:17, 111F
→
10/05 23:17, , 112F
10/05 23:17, 112F
推
10/05 23:17, , 113F
10/05 23:17, 113F
推
10/05 23:18, , 114F
10/05 23:18, 114F
→
10/05 23:18, , 115F
10/05 23:18, 115F
→
10/05 23:20, , 116F
10/05 23:20, 116F
推
10/05 23:20, , 117F
10/05 23:20, 117F
推
10/05 23:22, , 118F
10/05 23:22, 118F
推
10/05 23:23, , 119F
10/05 23:23, 119F
→
10/05 23:23, , 120F
10/05 23:23, 120F
→
10/05 23:24, , 121F
10/05 23:24, 121F
→
10/05 23:25, , 122F
10/05 23:25, 122F
推
10/05 23:26, , 123F
10/05 23:26, 123F
→
10/05 23:26, , 124F
10/05 23:26, 124F
→
10/05 23:27, , 125F
10/05 23:27, 125F
→
10/05 23:28, , 126F
10/05 23:28, 126F
→
10/05 23:28, , 127F
10/05 23:28, 127F
→
10/05 23:29, , 128F
10/05 23:29, 128F
推
10/05 23:30, , 129F
10/05 23:30, 129F
推
10/05 23:49, , 130F
10/05 23:49, 130F
推
10/05 23:54, , 131F
10/05 23:54, 131F
推
10/06 00:11, , 132F
10/06 00:11, 132F
推
10/06 00:21, , 133F
10/06 00:21, 133F
→
10/06 00:22, , 134F
10/06 00:22, 134F
推
10/06 00:23, , 135F
10/06 00:23, 135F
推
10/06 00:27, , 136F
10/06 00:27, 136F
→
10/06 00:27, , 137F
10/06 00:27, 137F
推
10/06 01:23, , 138F
10/06 01:23, 138F
→
10/06 01:24, , 139F
10/06 01:24, 139F
→
10/06 01:24, , 140F
10/06 01:24, 140F
→
10/06 08:13, , 141F
10/06 08:13, 141F
→
10/06 08:14, , 142F
10/06 08:14, 142F
推
10/06 18:00, , 143F
10/06 18:00, 143F
→
10/06 21:25, , 144F
10/06 21:25, 144F